Kozmetik Ürünlerin Gebelik Durumuna Göre Kullanım Farklılıkları

Year 2023, , 262 - 270, 20.06.2023

Elif Ateş , Deniz Aksu Arıca , Turhan Aran , Leyla Baykal Selçuk , Turan Set

https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.1181887

Abstract

Yöntem:Aile hekimliği, dermatoloji, kadın doğum ve kadın hastalıkları polikliniklerinde, Mayıs 2017-Ocak 2018 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilen bu kesitsel çalışmada, gebelik durumuna bağlı olarak dokuz kozmetik işlem ve 38 farklı kozmetik ve kişisel bakım ürününün kullanım farklılıkları değerlendirildi.
Bulgular:Gebe olan grup ve gebe olmayan karşılaştırma grubunun her ikisi de 219 kadından oluşuyordu. Gebe grupta en sık kullanılan iki ürün diş macunu ve şampuandı (sırasıyla %99,1 ve %98,1). Saç jölesi, şampuan, sabun, diş macunu ve vajinal temizlik maddeleri dışında incelenen tüm ürünlerin kullanım sıklığı gebelerde, gebe olmayanlara göre daha düşüktü. Bulgularımız, hamile kadınların genel hijyen ürünleri dışında ürün kullanımının azaldığını gösterdi.
Tartışma ve Sonuç:Hangi ürünlerin daha sık kullanıldığını ve gebe kadınların hangi ürünleri kullanmayı sürdürmek istediğini bilmek, hekimlere gebe kadınlara tavsiyede bulunma ve ürün maruziyetini araştırma konusunda rehberlik edebilir.

Keywords

Kozmetik, Gebe Kadınlar, Kadın Hijyen Ürünleri, Epidemiyoloji, Maternal-Fetal İlişkiler

Differences in the Use of Cosmetic Products Depending on Pregnancy Status

Abstract

Method: This cross-sectional study which was performed between May 2017 and January 2018 at a family medicine, dermatology, and obstetrics and gynecology outpatient clinic, evaluated differences in the use of nine cosmetic procedures, and 38 different cosmetic and personal care products depending on pregnancy status.
Results: The pregnant group and the non-pregnant comparison group both consisted of 219 women. The two most frequently used products in the pregnant group were toothpaste and shampoo (99.1% and 98.1% respectively). The frequencies of use of all the examined products were lower in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women, except for hair gel, shampoo, soap, toothpaste, and vaginal cleansing agents. Compared to a pregnant group, being non-pregnant increases the risk of using ten or more cosmetic products 5.8 times fold. Our findings indicated that pregnant women’s use of products declined, except for general hygiene products.
Discussion and conclusion:Knowing which products are used most often and which products pregnant women intend to continue to use can guide physicians in terms of advising pregnant women and investigating product exposure.

Keywords

Cosmetics, Pregnant Women, Feminine Hygiene Products, Epidemiology, Maternal-Fetal Relations

References

• References 1. Marie C, Cabut S, Vendittelli F, Sauvant-Rochat MP. Changes in Cosmetics Use during Pregnancy and Risk Perception by Women. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2016;13(4).
• 2. Koch HM, Lorber M, Christensen KL, Pälmke C, Koslitz S, Brüning T. Identifying sources of phthalate exposure with human biomonitoring: results of a 48 h fasting study with urine collection and personal activity patterns. International journal of hygiene and environmental health. 2013;216(6):672-81.
• 3. Lang C, Fisher M, Neisa A, MacKinnon L, Kuchta S, MacPherson S, et al. Personal Care Product Use in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Implications for Exposure Assessment. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2016;13(1):105.
• 4. Arıca DA, Baykal Selçuk L, Aran T, Ateş E, Yaylı S, Bahadır S. The Use of Cosmetics and Personal Care Products During Pregnancy. Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi. 2017;11(1):22-7.
• 5. Braun JM, Just AC, Williams PL, Smith KW, Calafat AM, Hauser R. Personal care product use and urinary phthalate metabolite and paraben concentrations during pregnancy among women from a fertility clinic. J Expo Sci Env Epid. 2014;24(5):459-66.
• 6. Buckley JP, Palmieri RT, Matuszewski JM, Herring AH, Baird DD, Hartmann KE, et al. Consumer product exposures associated with urinary phthalate levels in pregnant women. J Expo Sci Env Epid. 2012;22(5):468-75.
• 7. Fisher M, MacPherson S, Braun JM, Hauser R, Walker M, Feeley M, et al. Paraben Concentrations in Maternal Urine and Breast Milk and Its Association with Personal Care Product Use. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(7):4009-17.
• 8. Parlett LE, Calafat AM, Swan SH. Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products. J Expo Sci Env Epid. 2013;23(2):197-206.
• 9. Fitzpatrick, T. B. (1988). The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Archives of dermatology, 124(6), 869-871).
• 10. Lee KC, Korgavkar K, Dufresne RG, Higgins HW. Safety of cosmetic dermatologic procedures during pregnancy. Dermatologic Surgery. 2013;39(11):1573-86.
• 11. Goldberg D, Maloney M. Dermatologic surgery and cosmetic procedures during pregnancy and the post‐partum period. Dermatologic therapy. 2013;26(4):321-30.
• 12. Trivedi M, Kroumpouzos G, Murase J. A review of the safety of cosmetic procedures during pregnancy and lactation. International journal of women's dermatology. 2017;3(1):6-10.
• 13. Murase JE, Heller MM, Butler DC. Safety of dermatologic medications in pregnancy and lactation: Part I. Pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2014;70(3):401. e1-. e14.
• 14. Ficheux A, Wesolek N, Chevillotte G, Roudot A. Consumption of cosmetic products by the French population. First part: frequency data. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2015;78:159-69.
• 15. Jiang H, Xiong X, Buekens P, Su Y, Qian X. Use of mouth rinse during pregnancy to improve birth and neonatal outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015;15(1):311.
• 16. Guerra-Tapia A, Gonzalez-Guerra E. Hair Cosmetics: Dyes. Actas dermo-sifiliograficas. 2014;105(9):833-9.
• 17. Couto AC, Ferreira JD, Rosa AC, Pombo-de-Oliveira MS, Koifman S, Leukemia BCSGoIA. Pregnancy, maternal exposure to hair dyes and hair straightening cosmetics, and early age leukemia. Chemico-biological interactions. 2013;205(1):46-52.
• 18. Haraux E, Braun K, Buisson P, Stéphan-Blanchard E, Devauchelle C, Ricard J, et al. Maternal Exposure to Domestic Hair Cosmetics and Occupational Endocrine Disruptors Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Hypospadias in the Offspring. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2016;14(1):27.
• 19. Manová E, von Goetz N, Keller C, Siegrist M, Hungerbühler K. Use patterns of leave-on personal care products among Swiss-German children, adolescents, and adults. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2013;10(7):2778-98.