Development and psychometric evaluation of future physicians' approach to health literacy scale (F-PATHS)
Abstract
Objective: Health literacy (HL) practices are a key element of effective communication between patients and healthcare professionals, enabling the delivery of better quality patient-centered care. The main purpose of this study is to develop a set of scales within the scope of an Erasmus + European Union Project in order to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of clinical period students of the national partners about HL. Subsequently, the validity and reliability analyses of the set of scales (Future Physicians’ Approach to HL Scale, F-PATHS) are presented.
Methods: A total of 39 statements, to be analyzed for validity and reliability, were delivered to the participants by the convenience sampling method as a component of an online data collection form with a total of 62 questions prepared through Google Forms. Then, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was applied to evaluate the construct validity. Principal component analysis and the “direct oblimin” rotation method were used in EFA. The reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the item-total score correlation.
Results: Considering the factor loadings and theoretical framework, items 3, 4 and 26 were removed from the scale set. The total variance explained percentage of the final scale set was 63.96% and the number of factors was 7. The KMO value was 0.913, and the Bartlett test was statistically significant (p<0.001). Considering the theoretical structure and Likert format of the scale set, it was determined that it measured different characteristics and could be evaluated independently as three separate scales. According to the KMO value and Bartlett’s test, the data were suitable for factor analysis for all three scales and the factor structure was regular. Cronbach's Alpha values of the scales are 0.862, 0.858, and 0.909, respectively.
Conclusion: F-PATHS appears to be valid in terms of EFA and reliable for determining the approaches of faculty of medicine clinical term students regarding the HL of the society.
Keywords
Health literacy, Medical students, Public health, Scales, Validity and reliability
Supporting Institution
The study was conducted within the framework of an Erasmus+ European Union Project of Strategic Partnership.
Ethical Statement
Participation in the research was carried out on a voluntary basis and informed consent was obtained from the participants. For the research, permission was received from Gazi University Ethics Commission (date: 23.3.2021; number: E-77082166- 604.01.02-59610) and faculty deans.
References
- 1. Ratzan SC, Parker RM. Introduction. In: Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, editors. National Library of Medicine Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health Literacy. NLM Pub. No. CBM 2000-1. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
- 2. Okan O, Bauer U, Levin-Zamir D, Pinheiro P, Sørensen K. International Handbook of Health Literacy: Research, practice and policy across the lifespan. Bristol: Policy Press, 2019.
- 3. WHO. Health literacy: The solid facts. In: Kickbusch I, Pelikan JM, Apfel F, Tsouros AD, editors. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe [online]. Available at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/128703/e96854.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2025.
- 4. Liu YB, Liu L, Li YF, Chen YL. Relationship between Health Literacy, Health-Related Behaviors and Health Status: A Survey of Elderly Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;12(8):9714-9725.
- 5. Weiss BD. Health literacy research: Isn’t there something better we could be doing? Health Commun 2015;30(12):1173-1175.
- 6. Adkins RN, Corus C. Health literacy for improved health outcomes: Effective capital in the marketplace. J Consum Aff 2009;43(2):199-222.
- 7. Ülker İ, Aydın MA, Yıldız M, Coşkun H. Relationship between microbiota awareness, nutrition literacy, and health literacy among adolescents. Turk J Med Sci 2024;54(5):938-948.
- 8. Sacks K, Kim B. Health Literacy in the United States: Enhancing Assessments and Reducing Disparities. In: Milken Institute [online]. Available at: https://milkeninstitute.org/content-hub/research-and-reports/reports/health-literacy-united-states-enhancing-assessments-and-reducing-disparities. Accessed March 22, 2025.
- 9. McCaskill A, Gasch-Gallen A, Montero-Marco J. Measuring general health literacy using the HLS19-Q12 in specialty consultations in Spain. BMC Public Health 2024;24(1):3247.
- 10. Soğanda SY, Öztop MB, Üner S, et al. Empowering health literacy: Turkiye’s Health Literacy Action Plan 2022-2026. Eur J Public Health 2024;34(Suppl 3):ckae144.2192.