EN
TR
A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effects on pain, symptom severity, and functionality of different physiotherapy methods applied to patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and to evaluate the advantages of these over each other.
Methods: A total of 75 patients (69 females, 6 males) aged 25-60 years were separated into 3 groups. The patients in Group 1 were given a home exercise program (HP), including median nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Group 2 received the same HP plus manual therapy (MT), including soft tissue and joint mobilisation. Group 3 received the same HP plus extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). Pain severity was evaluated with a Visual Analog Scale. Symptom severity and levels of functionality were evaluated with the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire and the Cochin Hand Function Questionnaire. All the patients were evaluated before and after treatment.
Results: While there was a significant decrease in the resting and activity pain levels of each 3 groups after the treatment (p<0,05), no significant difference was found between MT and ESWT groups (p> 0.05). However, the pain values of these two groups were significantly decreased compared to the EP group (p <0.05). The pain values of both groups were significantly lower than those of the HP control group (p <0.05). A statistically significant increase was determined in the level of functionality in all the groups after treatment (p<0.05). The decrease in symptom severity and the increase in functionality were significantly greater in the MT and ESWT groups compared to the HP group (p<0.05). After the treatment, there were no superiorities with respect to the pain, symptom severity, and functionality values of the MT and ESWT groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: In our study, the MT and ESWT applications we used in patients with CTS patients provided significant improvement compared to HP exercises only. We speculate that some differences that are not seen in the early period can be seen in long-term follow-up. Further studies should be performed to assess the longterm results.
Keywords
References
- References1. Alfonso C, Jann S, Massa R, Torreggiani A. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Neurol Sci. 2010; 31:243–252.
- References2. MacDermid J C, Wessel J. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic Review. Journal of Hand Therapy 2004; 17: 309–319.
- References3. Uchiyama S., et al., Current concepts of carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology, treatment, and evaluation. Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2010; 15:1-13.
- References4. Kuran B. Ön kol, el-el bileği ağrılarında egzersiz reçeteleme: Derleme. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 2014;60 (Özel Sayı 2): S43-S49.
- References5. Basson A, Olivier B, Ellis R, Coppieters M, Stewart A, Mudzi W. The effectiveness of neural mobilization for neuromusculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta- analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 47: 593-615.
- References6. Kim SD. Efficacy of tendon and nerve gliding exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(8):2645-2648.
- References7. Abdolrazaghi HA, Khansari M, Mirshahi M, Ahmadi Pishkuhi M. Effectiveness of Tendon and Nerve Gliding Exercises in the Treatment of Patients With Mild Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Hand (N Y). 2021 Apr 15:15589447211006857.
- References8. Kaltenborn FM: Mannuel Mobilization of the Ekstremity Joints. 4th ed., Oslo:Olaf Norlis Borkhandel.1089.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Rehabilitation
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
April 20, 2023
Submission Date
December 8, 2021
Acceptance Date
November 23, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 34 Number: 1
APA
Torun, N., & Tuncer, A. (2023). A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 34(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1034102
AMA
1.Torun N, Tuncer A. A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2023;34(1):93-101. doi:10.21653/tjpr.1034102
Chicago
Torun, Neslihan, and Ayşenur Tuncer. 2023. “A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 34 (1): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1034102.
EndNote
Torun N, Tuncer A (April 1, 2023) A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 34 1 93–101.
IEEE
[1]N. Torun and A. Tuncer, “A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME”, Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 93–101, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.21653/tjpr.1034102.
ISNAD
Torun, Neslihan - Tuncer, Ayşenur. “A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME”. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 34/1 (April 1, 2023): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1034102.
JAMA
1.Torun N, Tuncer A. A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2023;34:93–101.
MLA
Torun, Neslihan, and Ayşenur Tuncer. “A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol. 34, no. 1, Apr. 2023, pp. 93-101, doi:10.21653/tjpr.1034102.
Vancouver
1.Neslihan Torun, Ayşenur Tuncer. A COMPARISON OF MANUAL THERAPY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi. 2023 Apr. 1;34(1):93-101. doi:10.21653/tjpr.1034102