Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN

Year 2020, , 21 - 28, 13.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.526062

Abstract

Purpose: This study was planned to compare the effectiveness of high voltage pulsed
galvanic (HVPG) stimulation, Russian current and isometric exercise on
quadriceps femoris (QF) isometric muscle strengthd in healthy young women.



Methods: Forty-six healthy young women were included in the study. Before and
after the training, the dominant side QF isometric muscle strength of participants
was assessed with the isokinetic dynamometer.
The
peak torque and average torques of the participants were recorded after the
test. The training was planned as HVPG current group (n=16), Russian current
group (n=15) and isometric strengthening group
(n=15). All treatments were performed under physiotherapist supervision for a
total of 15 sessions for 3 days a week for 5 weeks.



Results: No statistical
difference was found between the groups when the peak torque and average torque
delta values were compared (p> 0.05).



Conclusion: The
highest rate of change belongs to the HVPG group in terms of increasing the QF
isometric muscle strength, therefore, we recommend that it is preferred in
clinical practice. 

References

  • Baskan E, Cavlak U, Yildiz HH. Comparison of electrical stimulation and isometric training on isokinetic strength of knee extensors: A randomized clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27(1):11-15
  • Maffiuletti NA, Zory R, Miotti D, Pellegrino MA, Jubeau M, Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular adaptations to elec¬trostimulation resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil .2006; 85: 167 175.
  • Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J. Superimposed single impulse and pulse train electrical stimulation: a quantitative assessment during submaximal isometric knee extension in young, healthy men. Muscle Nerve .1999; 22: 1038–1046.
Year 2020, , 21 - 28, 13.04.2020
https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.526062

Abstract

References

  • Baskan E, Cavlak U, Yildiz HH. Comparison of electrical stimulation and isometric training on isokinetic strength of knee extensors: A randomized clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27(1):11-15
  • Maffiuletti NA, Zory R, Miotti D, Pellegrino MA, Jubeau M, Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular adaptations to elec¬trostimulation resistance training. Am J Phys Med Rehabil .2006; 85: 167 175.
  • Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J. Superimposed single impulse and pulse train electrical stimulation: a quantitative assessment during submaximal isometric knee extension in young, healthy men. Muscle Nerve .1999; 22: 1038–1046.
There are 3 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri
Authors

Bilge Başakcı Çalık 0000-0002-7267-7622

Elif Gür Kabul 0000-0003-3209-1499

Meryem Buke 0000-0002-5700-9407

Fatma Unver 0000-0002-3100-0818

Filiz Altug 0000-0002-4287-8562

Publication Date April 13, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Başakcı Çalık, B., Gür Kabul, E., Buke, M., Unver, F., et al. (2020). A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 31(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.526062
AMA Başakcı Çalık B, Gür Kabul E, Buke M, Unver F, Altug F. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. April 2020;31(1):21-28. doi:10.21653/tjpr.526062
Chicago Başakcı Çalık, Bilge, Elif Gür Kabul, Meryem Buke, Fatma Unver, and Filiz Altug. “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 31, no. 1 (April 2020): 21-28. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.526062.
EndNote Başakcı Çalık B, Gür Kabul E, Buke M, Unver F, Altug F (April 1, 2020) A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 31 1 21–28.
IEEE B. Başakcı Çalık, E. Gür Kabul, M. Buke, F. Unver, and F. Altug, “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN”, Turk J Physiother Rehabil, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2020, doi: 10.21653/tjpr.526062.
ISNAD Başakcı Çalık, Bilge et al. “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN”. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 31/1 (April 2020), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.526062.
JAMA Başakcı Çalık B, Gür Kabul E, Buke M, Unver F, Altug F. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2020;31:21–28.
MLA Başakcı Çalık, Bilge et al. “A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN”. Türk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, vol. 31, no. 1, 2020, pp. 21-28, doi:10.21653/tjpr.526062.
Vancouver Başakcı Çalık B, Gür Kabul E, Buke M, Unver F, Altug F. A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT QUADRICEPS FEMORIS ISOMETRIC STRENGTHENING METHODS IN HEALTHY YOUNG WOMEN. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2020;31(1):21-8.