TURKISH RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF POSTURAL AWARENESS SCALE IN OFFICE WORKERS

Year 2024, Volume: 35 Issue: 1, 114 - 122, 20.04.2024

Ömer Dursun , Cihan Önen

https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1312179

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform the Turkish cross-cultural adaptation of the Postural Awareness Scale and test its reliability and validity on office workers.
Methods: The study was conducted at Bitlis Eren University, and 180 office workers were included in the study. The average age of the participants was 39.05±8.44, and 74.4% were male. As a first step, forward and backward translations of the scale were performed. Then, the final version of the scale was developed and introduced to all the participants by face-to-face interviews. The internal consistency and construct validity of the scale was assessed with internal consistency analysis, explanatory and confirmatory analyses.
Results: The Turkish version of the Postural Awareness Scale, consisting of eleven items, had satisfactory reliability (total α score = .854, factor 1 score = .886, factor 2 score = .777). The reliability of the scale was confirmed by the test-retest analysis performed with a two-week interval as well (r = .831). In explanatory factor analysis, twelfth item was loaded on both factors. In confirmatory factor analysis, factor load of the 12th item was low (0.21). For these reasons, the 12th item was removed from the scale.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Postural Awareness Scale, consisting of eleven items, is a reliable and valid scale for the assessment of postural awareness in office workers.

Keywords

Awareness, Office workers, Posture

Project Number

Araştırma proje mahiyetinde değildir.

POSTÜRAL FARKINDALIK ÖLÇEĞİNİN OFİS ÇALIŞANLARINDA TÜRKÇE GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİLİĞİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Postüral Farkındalık Ölçeğinin Türkçe kültürel adaptasyonu ile ofis çalışanlarındaki güvenirlik ve geçerliliğini yapmaktı.
Yöntem: Çalışma Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi’nde yürütüldü ve çalışmaya 180 ofis çalışanı dahil edildi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen katılımcıların yaş ortalamaları 39,05±8,44’tü ve %74,4’ü erkekti. İlk adım olarak ölçeğin ileri geri çevirileri yapıldı. Ardından ölçeğin son hali geliştirildi ve katılımcılara yüz yüze görüşülerek uygulandı. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığı ve yapısal geçerliliği iç tutarlılık analizi, açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri ile değerlendirildi.
Sonuçlar: On bir maddeden oluşan Postüral Farkındalık Ölçeği Türkçe versiyonu güvenirliği yeterli düzeydeydi (toplam α değeri = .854, faktör 1 = .886, faktör 2 = .777). Ölçek güvenirliği iki hafta arayla yapılan test tekrar testi ile onaylandı (r = .831). Açıklayıcı faktör analizinde on ikinci madde her iki faktöre de yüklenmekteydi. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde on ikinci maddenin faktör yükü düşüktü (0.21). Bu sebeplerden dolayı on ikinci madde ölçekten çıkarıldı.
Tartışma: On bir maddeden oluşan Postüral Farkındalık Ölçeği Türkçe versiyonu ofis çalışanlarında postüral farkındalığın değerlendirmesinde güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçektir.

Keywords

Farkındalık, Ofis çalışanları, Postür

Supporting Institution

Herhangi bir kurumdan destek alınmamıştır.

Project Number

Araştırma proje mahiyetinde değildir.

Thanks

Araştırma süresinde yazar olmayıp da araştırmaya katkıda bulunan herhangi bir kişi olmadığından teşekkür kısmı boş bırakılmıştır.

References

• Kim D, Cho M, Park Y, Yang Y. Effect of an exercise program for posture correction on musculoskeletal pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(6):1791-4.
• Carini F, Mazzola M, Fici C, Palmeri S, Messina M, Damiani P, et al. Posture and posturology, anatomical and physiological profiles: overview and current state of art. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(1):11- 16.
• Castanharo R, Duarte M, McGill S. Corrective sitting strategies: An examination of muscle activity and spine loading. J Electromyogr and Kinesiol. 2014;24(1):114-9.
• Dagne D, Abebe SM, Getachew A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among bank workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020;25(1):33.
• Darivemula SB, Goswami K, Gupta SK, Salve H, Singh U, Goswami AK. Work-related neck pain among desk job workers of tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India: Burden and determinants. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(1):50-4.
• Celik S, Celik K, Dirimese E, Taşdemir N, Arik T, Büyükkara İ. Determination of pain in musculoskeletal system reported by office workers and the pain risk factors. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2018;31(1):91-111.
• Parry S, Straker L. The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):296.
• Smith L, Hamer M, Ucci M, Marmot A, Gardner B, Sawyer A, et al. Weekday and weekend patterns of objectively measured sitting, standing, and stepping in a sample of office-based workers: the active buildings study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:9.
• Clemes SA, Patel R, Mahon C, Griffiths PL. Sitting time and step counts in office workers. Occup Med. 2014;64(3):188-92.
• Noroozi MV, Hajibabaei M, Saki A, Memari Z. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among office workers. Jundishapu J Health Sci. 2015;7(1):e27157.
• Vongsirinavarat M, Wangbunk S, Sakulsriprasert P, Petviset H. Prevalence of scapular dyskinesis in office workers with neck and scapular pain. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2023;29(1):50-5.
• Ernst MJ, Sax N, Meichtry A, Aegerter AM, Luomajoki H, Lüdtke K, et al. Cervical musculoskeletal impairments and pressure pain sensitivity in office workers with headache. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023;26:102816
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work, 2015. [updated 2016; cited 2023 April 12]. Available from: https://www.bls.gov/news. release/osh2.nr0.htm
• Ahmed H, Shaphe M, Iqbal A, Khan AR, Anwer S. Effect of Trunk Stabilization Exercises using a Gym Ball with or without Electromyography-Biofeedback in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: An Experimental Study. Phys Med Rehabil Kurortmed. 2016;26:79-83.
• Cramer H, Mehling WE, Saha FJ, Dobos G, Lauche R. Postural awareness and its relation to pain: validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders. 2018;19(1):109.
• Onan D, Ülger Ö. The Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire in Chronic Neck Pain Patients: Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability Study. Spine. 2019;45(3):163-9.
• Erol E, Yıldız A, Yıldız R, Apaydın U, Gökmen D, Elbasan B. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire. Spine. 2018;44(9):549-54.
• Da Costa Silva L, Belrose C, Trousselard M, Rea B, Seery E, Verdonk C, et al. Self-Reported Body Awareness: Validation of the Postural Awareness Scale and the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (Version 2) in a Non-clinical Adult French-Speaking Sample. Front Psychol. 2022;13:946271.
• Colgan DD, Green K, Eddy A, Brems C, Sherman KJ, Cramer H,et al. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the English Version of the Postural Awareness Scale. Pain Med. 2021;22(11):2686-99.
• Topino E, Gori A, Cramer H. Mind and Body: Italian Validation of the Postural Awareness Scale. Front Psychol 2020;11:827.
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Wint DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
• Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
• Almeida LN, Behlau M, Ramos N dos S, Barbosa IK, Almeida AA. Factor analysis of the Brazilian version of the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) Questionnaire. J Voice. 2022;36(5):736. e17-736.e24.
• Dudek H, Landmesser J. Income satisfaction and relative deprivation. Stat Transit. 2012;13:321-34.
• Shields SA, Mallory ME, Simon A. The Body Awareness Questionnaire: Reliability and validity. J Pers Assess. 1989;53:802-15.
• Balasubramaniam R, Wing AM. The dynamics of standing balance. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6(12):531-6.
• Hytönen M, Pyykkö I, Aalto H, Starck J. Postural control and age. Acta Oto-laryngol. 1993;113(2):119-22.
• Mohammadipour F, Pourranjbar M, Naderi S, Rafie F. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Iranian office workers: prevalence and risk factors. J Med Life. 2018;11(4):328-33.
• Calik BB, Yagci N, Oztop M, Caglar D. Effects of risk factors related to computer use on musculoskeletal pain in office workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(1):269-74.
• Ardahan M, Simsek H. Analyzing musculoskeletal system discomforts and risk factors in computer-using office workers. Pak J Med Sci. 2016;32(6):1425-9.
• Safiri S, Kolahi A, Hoy D, Buchbinder R, Mansournia MA, Bettampadi D, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of neck pain in the general population, 1990-2017: systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ. 2020;368:m791.
• Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):299.