Aligned coaxial-electrospun artificial nerve conduits for repair of peripheral nerve injuries: A review

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 31 - 38, 25.06.2025

Mustafa Caner Karaaslan , Özlem Eğri

Abstract

In humans, the nervous system is divided into two: the central nervous system and the peripheral nervous system. Peripheral nerves form an extensive network that connects the brain and spinal cord to all other parts of the body. They are fragile and easily damaged. When these nerves are severed, it significantly affects the patients' quality of life, and even if the peripheral nerves regenerate themselves, regeneration does not occur in cases of major damage. There are treatment options available to support nerve regeneration, depending on the extent of the damage. One of these is the use of autografts, which is still the gold standard in tissue engineering applications. A disadvantage of autografts is that mobility in the region negatively affects the patient's life and there are various difficulties such as finding a donor. In cases where autografts are insufficient in nerve regeneration, peripheral nerve regeneration (PNR) is provided by supporting with biomaterials synthetically fabricated from natural or synthetic polymers. Although various tissue scaffold production techniques are available for the fabrication of biomaterials for nerve regeneration, producing materials that can mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) by electrospinning is frequently used today as a cheap and easy method. In this review, synthetic and natural polymers used in coaxial electrospinning technique to support nerve regeneration and the properties required for the peripheral nerve canal are discussed.

Keywords

Peripheral nerve conduit , Nerve regeneration , Coaxial electrospinning , Polymers , Biomaterials Tissue engineering

References

• Wang, S., et al. (2024). Research advancements on nerve guide conduits for nerve injury repair. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 35(6), 627–637.
• Amalakanti, S., Mulpuri, R. P., & Avula, V. C. R. (2024). Recent advances in biomaterial design for nerve guidance conduits: A narrative review. Advanced Technology in Neuroscience, 1(1), 32–42.
• Modrak, M., Sundem, L., & Elfar, J. (2017). Erythropoietin enhanced recovery after peripheral nerve injury. Neural Regeneration Research, 12(8), 1268–1269.
• Lee, S. K., & Wolfe, S. W. (2000). Peripheral nerve injury and repair. JAAOS—Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 8(4), 243–252.
• Li, R., et al. (2014). Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: A systematic review. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 68, 449–454.
• Gu, X., Ding, F., & Williams, D. F. (2014). Neural tissue engineering options for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, 35(24), 6143–6156.
• Lundborg, G. (2003). Richard P. Bunge memorial lecture. Nerve injury and repair--a challenge to the plastic brain. J Peripher Nerv Syst 8(4), 209-26.
• Ortigiella, M. E., Wood, M. B., & Cahill, D. R. (1987). Anatomy of the sural nerve complex. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 12(6), 1119–1123.
• Mackinnon, S. E., & Hudson, A. R. (1992). Clinical application of peripheral nerve transplantation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 90(4), 695–699.
• Evans, G. R. (2001). Peripheral nerve injury: A review and approach to tissue engineered constructs. The Anatomical Record, 263(4), 396–404.
• Meek, M. F., & Coert, J. H. (2008). US Food and Drug Administration/Conformit Europe-approved absorbable nerve conduits for clinical repair of peripheral and cranial nerves. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 60(1), 110–116.
• Hudson, T. W., Evans, G. R., & Schmidt, C. E. (2000). Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Orthopedic Clinics, 31(3), 485–497.
• Kehoe, S., Zhang, X., & Boyd, D. (2012). FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: A review of materials and efficacy. Injury, 43(5), 553–572.
• Schmidt, C. E., & Leach, J. B. (2003). Neural tissue engineering: Strategies for repair and regeneration. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 5(1), 293–347.
• Khaing, Z. Z., & Schmidt, C. E. (2012). Advances in natural biomaterials for nerve tissue repair. Neuroscience Letters, 519(2), 103–114.
• Hu, W.-J., et al. (2001). Molecular basis of biomaterial-mediated foreign body reactions. Blood, 98(4), 1231–1238.
• Rein, S., et al. (2024). Non degradation of chitosan and initial degradation of collagen nerve conduits used for protection of nerve coaptations. Microsurgery, 44(1), e31093.
• Lin, Y.-L., et al. (2008). Sciatic nerve repair by microgrooved nerve conduits made of chitosan-gold nanocomposites. Surgical Neurology, 70, S9–S18.
• Zhang, X., et al. (2024). Evolution of natural polymer nerve conduit technology in peripheral nerve repair: A narrative review. Advanced Technology in Neuroscience, 1(2), 229–243.
• Crook, B. S., Cullen, M. M., & Pidgeon, T. S. (2024). The role of tissue engineering and three-dimensional–filled conduits in bridging nerve gaps: A review of recent advancements. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online.
• Adams, I., et al. (1977). A comparative trial of polygycolic acid and silk as suture materials for accidental wounds. The Lancet, 310(8050), 1216–1217.
• Escobar, A., et al. (2023). Electroconductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) nanoparticle-loaded silk fibroin biocomposite conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 6(3), 118.
• Arslantunali, D., et al. (2014). Peripheral nerve conduits: Technology update. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, 405–424.
• Lu, M.-C., et al. (2009). Evaluation of a multi-layer microbraided polylactic acid fiber-reinforced conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 20, 1175–1180.
• Dai, W., et al. (2021). Material advancement in tissue-engineered nerve conduit. Nanotechnology Reviews, 10(1), 488–503.
• Evans, G. R., et al. (2000). Clinical long-term in vivo evaluation of poly(L-lactic acid) porous conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, 11(8), 869–878.
• Swainson, S. M., et al. (2019). Poly(glycerol adipate) (PGA), an enzymatically synthesized functionalizable polyester and versatile drug delivery carrier: A literature update. Polymers, 11(10), 1561.
• Tabesh, H., et al. (2009). The role of biodegradable engineered scaffolds seeded with Schwann cells for spinal cord regeneration. Neurochemistry International, 54(2), 73–83.
• Fujimaki, H., et al. (2019). Dedifferentiated fat cells in polyglycolic acid-collagen nerve conduits promote rat facial nerve regeneration. Regenerative Therapy, 11, 240–248.
• Weber, R. A., et al. (2000). A randomized prospective study of polyglycolic acid conduits for digital nerve reconstruction in humans. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 106(5), 1036–1045.
• Jeon, J., et al. (2020). Micro-grooved nerve guidance conduits combined with microfiber for rat sciatic nerve regeneration. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 90, 214–223.
• Gregory, H., & Phillips, J. B. (2021). Materials for peripheral nerve repair constructs: Natural proteins or synthetic polymers? Neurochemistry International, 143, 104953.
• Amini, S., et al. (2021). Natural and synthetic polymeric scaffolds used in peripheral nerve tissue engineering: Advantages and disadvantages. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 32(6), 2267–2289.
• Quan, Q., et al. (2019). Aligned fibers enhance nerve guide conduits when bridging peripheral nerve defects focused on early repair stage. Neural Regeneration Research, 14(5), 903–912.
• Castro, V. O., & Merlini, C. (2021). Aligned electrospun nerve conduits with electrical activity as a strategy for peripheral nerve regeneration. Artificial Organs, 45(8), 813–818.
• Shi, S., Ou, X., & Cheng, D. (2023). How advancing is peripheral nerve regeneration using nanofiber scaffolds? A comprehensive review of the literature. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 6763–6779.
• Apablaza, J. A., et al. (2021). Main morphological characteristics of tubular polymeric scaffolds to promote peripheral nerve regeneration—A scoping review. Polymers, 13(15), 2563.
• Rutkowski, G. E., & Heath, C. A. (2002). Development of a bioartificial nerve graft. I. Design based on a reaction–diffusion model. Biotechnology Progress, 18(2), 362–372.
• Kokai, L. E., et al. (2009). Diffusion of soluble factors through degradable polymer nerve guides: Controlling manufacturing parameters. Acta Biomaterialia, 5(7), 2540–2550.
• Vijayavenkataraman, S., et al. (2018). Electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printed nerve guide conduits (NGCs) for peripheral nerve injury repair. Polymers, 10(7), 753.
• Chang, C.-J., & Hsu, S.-H. (2006). The effect of high outflow permeability in asymmetric poly(dl-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials, 27(7), 1035–1042.
• Pawelec, K. M., et al. (2019). The mechanics of scaling-up multichannel scaffold technology for clinical nerve repair. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 91, 247–254.
• Hu, J., et al. (2016). Fabrication of nerve growth factor encapsulated aligned poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers and their assessment as a potential neural tissue engineering scaffold. Polymers, 8(2), 54.
• Cooper, A., Bhattarai, N., & Zhang, M. (2011). Fabrication and cellular compatibility of aligned chitosan–PCL fibers for nerve tissue regeneration. Carbohydrate Polymers, 85(1), 149–156.
• Neal, R. A., et al. (2012). Alignment and composition of laminin–polycaprolactone nanofiber blends enhance peripheral nerve regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 100(2), 406–423.