Planning of Sectoral Water Allocation: A case study of Seyhan River Basin

Year 2017, , 48 - 61, 30.07.2017

Nuray Ayten , Saliha Değirmencioğlu Taner Kimence

https://doi.org/10.31807/tjwsm.299253

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study
water allocation plan for Seyhan Basin that is the second largest after the
Nile basin located in the eastern Mediterranean was prepared. The purpose of
the study is that a plan for water allocation among groups of water use, or
sector is developed by considering environmental and socio-economic conditions
as well as the potential of surface and groundwater resources. Current  (the year 2016) and future conditions (2017,
2022, 2027 and 2037) have been analyzed in terms of economic and environmental
aspects. Scenarios on water allocation were created to determine the most suitable water use pattern. The major
finding is that water potential is expected to drop to 6.6 billion m³
in mild  drought conditions and 6.3
billion m³ in severe  drought
conditions due to the impacts of climate change.
Consequently, agricultural water needs are met in the range of 90% level (the year
2037) to 94% level
(the year 2017), and environmental flow
needs are met in C
level of environmental management class in the context of applied method (GEFC).

Keywords

Water resources management, water potential, sectoral water demands, sectoral subbasin, water allocation

References

• DSI (2014). Master Plan Report for Seyhan River Basin. Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1998). Crop evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements (FAO Irrigation and Drainage paper 56.)
• Huber-Lee, A., D. Yates, D. Purkey, W. Yu, B. Runkle, (2003). Water, climate, food, and environment in the Sacramento Basin — contribution to ADAPT: Adaptation strategies to changing environment. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014). Climate Change 2014: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, (Cambridge University Press).
• McKee, T.B., N.J. Doesken & J. Kleist, (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scale. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, California, 1993. Boston, American Meteorological Society, pp. 179–184.)
• Psomas, A., Y. Panagopoulos, D. Konsta & M. Mimikou, (2016) Designing water efficiency measures in a catchment in Greece using WEAP and SWAT models (2nd EWAS International Conference).
• Raes, D., Mallants, D., & Song, Z., (1996). Rainbow: A software package for Analyzing hydrologic data. (Hydraulic engineering software VI. Southampton, Boston, Mass., Computational Mechanics publications, pp. 525-34.)
• Sánchez, R. & G. Schmidt., (2012). Environmental flows in the EU.
• Suryawanshi, R. A. & A. J. Shirke, (2014). Watershed Management of Subernarekha River Basin using WEAP, (International Journal of Recent Trends in Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 156-163.)
• SYGM (2016). Sectorale Water Allocation Plan for Seyhan River Basin. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü.
• SYGM, (2016). The Project of Impacts of Climate Change on Water Resources. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü.
• SPSS Statistics Base 17.0 User’s Guide (2007). USA, pp. 640.
• Tena B. A., Srinivasa Rao G. V. R., Abbulu Y., (2015). WEAP Modeling of Surface Water Resources Allocation in Didessa Subbasin, West Ethiopia, Sustainable Water Resources Management.
• Tennant, D.L., (1976). Instream flow regimens for flush, wildlife, recreation and related environment resources (Fisheries, Volume 1, 1976 - Issue 4).
• World Meteorological Organization (2012). Standardized Precipitation Index, User Guide.