Investigating the Influence ofAttitudes and Behaviours of Knowledge Professionals on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management System: A Study on Turkish Corporations

Volume: 28 Number: 4 October 1, 2014
EN TR

Investigating the Influence ofAttitudes and Behaviours of Knowledge Professionals on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management System: A Study on Turkish Corporations

Abstract

The purpose ofthis study is to investigate the relationship between attitudes, behaviours ofknowledge professionals, and the efficiency ofknowledge managementprocess on the effectiveness ofknowledge management system in Turkish private sector companies. The data were gathered from knowledge professionals N=304 currently employed in differentsectors, located in Turkey. Thefactor, correlation, duncan and regression tests were conducted to analyze the relationship between the variables. The empiricalfindings indicate that attitudes ofknowledge professionals and administrative behaviours of employees have a significant positive effect on effectiveness ofknowledge management system. There has been no significant relationshipfound between the efficiency ofprocess and the effectiveness ofthe system

Keywords

Knowledge management,knowledge professionals,Turkish private sector.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal ofApplied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
  2. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research ıssues. MIS Quarterly, 25, 107-136.
  3. Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.
  4. Beijerse, R. P. (1999). Questionsin knowledge management: defining and conceptualizing aphenomenon. Journal ofKnowledge Management, 3(2), 94-109.
  5. Bellinger, G., Castro, D. and Mills,A. (2004). Data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. Retrieved from Jan 16, 2012 http://www.mrhanson.org/Data%20information%20Knowledge%20Wisdom.pdf
  6. Bhatt, G.D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal ofKnowledge Management, 5(1), 68 - 75.
  7. Blackmore, J. (2002). Globalisation and the restructuring of higher education for new knowledge economies: new dangers or old habits troubling gender equity work in universities?. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 419-441.
  8. Brinkley, I. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy, research paper. London: The Work Foundation. Retrieved from Jun 11, 2014 http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/65_ definmg%20knowledge%20economy.pdf
  9. Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management ınfluence ınnovation and competitiveness?. Journal ofKnowledge Management. 4(2), 87-98.
  10. Chen, R. F., Burstein, F., (2006). A dynamic model of knowledge management for higher education development. In Proceedings ofthe 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, 10 July 2006 to 13 July 2006 (pp. 173-180). Sydney NSWAustralia: University ofTechnology.
APA
Bir, B., & Erdilek Karabay, M. (2014). Investigating the Influence ofAttitudes and Behaviours of Knowledge Professionals on the Effectiveness of Knowledge Management System: A Study on Turkish Corporations. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(4), 474-495. https://izlik.org/JA36CF94GJ