Abstract
Hakemlik sistemi bilimsel yayıncılık açısından vazgeçilmez olarak görülse de sorunlu tarafları da bulunmaktadır. Bu yazı 21-25 Eylül’de kutlanan Hakem Değerlendirme Haftası nedeniyle kaleme alınmıştır. Çalışmada hakemlik sürecinin zayıf yönleri tartışılmış, önerilen modeller aktarılmıştır. .
References
- Akademik Teşvik Ödeneği Yönetmeliği. (2018, 27 Haziran). Resmi Gazete (Sayı: 30461). Erişim Adresi: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/06/20180627-6.pdf
- Author Insight Survey. (2014). Author Insights 2014. Erişim adresi: https://figshare.com/articles/MSS_Author_Insights_2014/1204999
- Crotty, D. (2010, 17 Ağustos). Revisiting: The problem(s) with credit for peer review. [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/17/revisiting-the-problems-with-credit-for-peer-review-2/
- Davis, P. (2009, 21 Eylül). Peer Review Survey 2009. [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/09/21/peer-review-survey-2009/
- Davis, P. (2013, 22 Şubat). Rewarding reviewers: Money, prestige, or some of both? Erişim adresi: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/02/22/rewarding-reviewers-money-prestige-or-some-of-both/
- Fox, J. ve Petchey, O. L. (2010). Pubcreds: fixing the peer review process by “privatizing” the reviewer commons. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 91(3), 325-333.
- Macdonald, F. (2016, 19 Ağustos). 8 scientific papers that were rejected before going on to win a Nobel Prize. Erişim adresi: https://www.sciencealert.com/these-8-papers-were-rejected-before-going-on-to-win-the-nobel-prize
- Mehmani, B. (2016). Is open peer review the way forward? [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers-update/story/innovation-in-publishing/is-open-peer-review-the-way-forward
- Michael, A. (2015, 4 Haziran). Ask the chefs: What did you learn at this year’s 2015 SSP Annual Meeting? [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/06/04/ask-the-chefs-what-did-you-learn-at-this-years-ssp-annual-meeting/
- MIT Press Journals. (2020, 10 Ağustos). Quantitative Science Studies Journal to Participate in Transparent Peer Review. [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: https://mitpress.mit.edu/blog/quantitative-science-studies-journal-participate-transparent-peer-review
- Publons. (2020). How it Works: For Reviewers. Erişim adresi: https://publons.com/benefits/reviewers/how
- Sense About Science. (2009). Peer Review Survey. Erişim adresi: https://senseaboutscience.org/activities/peer-review-survey-2009/
- Waltman, L. (2020, 2 Eylül). Quantitative Science Studies launches transparent peer review pilot. [Blog yazısı]. Erişim adresi: http://issi-society.org/blog/posts/2020/september/quantitative-science-studies-launches-transparent-peer-review-pilot/
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Library and Information Studies |
| Journal Section | Letter to Editor |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | September 7, 2020 |
| Acceptance Date | September 15, 2020 |
| Publication Date | September 3, 2020 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2020 Volume: 34 Issue: 3 |