InformationLiteracy: A Conceptual Analysis

Year 2010, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 723 - 747, 01.10.2010

S.serap Kurbanoğlu

Abstract

Theconceptofinformation literacyhas longbeen debated inthe literature. Becauseitmeans lots ofthingsto lotsof people, there hasbeenadisagreement overthe concept.Therearenumerous definitions of information literacy and theconcept is stillevolving. Thereisresultant ambiguity overthe concept.Theaim ofthisarticle isto clarify themain components of theconceptthroughtananalysis of itsvarious definitions, models,and standartsas well as otherliteracy concepts which areclosely linked to informationliteracy

Keywords

informationliteracy, informationliteracy definitions, informationliteracymodels, information literacy standards, conceptualanalysis

Bilgi Okuryazarlığı: Kavramsal Bir Analiz

Abstract

Bilgi okuryazarlığı kavramı literatürde uzun süre tartışılmıştır. Herkes için farklı bir anlam ifade ettiğinden kavram üzerinde fikir ayrılıkları söz konusudur. Bilgi okuryazarlığının çok sayıda tanımı yapılmıştır ve kavram hala evrilmektedir. Sonuç olarak kavramla ilgili bir belirsizlik söz konusudur. Bu makalenin amacı, çeşitli bilgi okuryazarlığı tanımlarnı, modelleri, standartları ve bilgi okuryazarlığı ile yakından ilgili diğer okuryazarlık kavramlarını analiz ederek kavramı oluşturan temel unsurları belirlemektir.

Keywords

bilgi okuryazarlığı, bilgi okuryazarlığı tanımları, bilgi okuryazarlığı standartları, bilgi okuryazarlığı modelleri, kavram analizi.

References

• Alexandriaproclamation oninformation literacy and lifelong learning: Beacons of the informationsociety.(2005). 28Ekim 2010 tarihinde http://www.ifla.org/en/publications/beacons-of-the-information-society-the- alexandria-proclamation-on-information-literacy-adresinden erişildi.
• AmericanAssociationofSchool Librarians veAssociationforEducational Communicationand Technology.(1998a). Information literacy standards for studentlearning.Chicago: American Library Association.
• American Association of School Librarians ve Association for Educational Communication and Technology (1998b). Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago: American Library Association.
• AmericanLibrary Association (1989). Presidential Committee onInformationLiteracy: final report. Chicago: ALA. 28Ekim2010 tarihinde http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential.cfm adresinden erişildi.
• Associationof College and Research Libraries. (2000). Informationliteracycompetency standardsforhighereducation.29Ekim 2010tarihinde http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm adresinden erişildi.
• Badke, W.(2010). Foundationsofinformation literacy: Learningfrom Paul Zurkowski. Online 34(1), 48-50.
• Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: Areviewofconcepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
• Bond,T. (2009). The Informationliteracymodels and inquirylearning models: Sauce diagram.29Ekim2010 tarihinde http://ictnz.com/sauce- resources/SAUCEDiagram.htmadresinden erişildi.
• Braden,R. A.ve Hortin, J. A. (1982). Identifying thetheoretical foundationsof visual literacy. Journal of Visual/VerbalLanguaging,2, 37-42.
• Bruce,C.(1994). Informationliteracyblueprint. 28Ekim2010 tarihinde https://courses.washington.edu/mlis560/su09/Module1/bruce_information_literacy_ blueprint.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Bruce,C.(1997). Sevenfaces of information literacy in highereducation. 28 Ekim 2010 tarihindehttp://sky.fit.qut.edu.au/~bruce/il/faces.jspadresinden erişildi.
• Bundy,A. (ed.). (2004). AustralianandNewZealand informationliteracyframework: Principles, standards and practice (2nd ed.). Adelaide:Australianand New Zealand Institute forInformationLiteracy. 29 Ekim2010 tarihinde http://www.library.unisa.edu.au/infoskills/infolit/infolit-2nd-edition.pdfadresinden erişildi.
• California Academicand Research Libraries Task Force (1997).Draft recommendations to WASC onaninformation literacy standard. 28Ekim 2010tarihinde http://www.carl-acrl.org/Archives/DocumentsArchive/Reports/rectoWASC.html adresinden erişildi.
• Chartered Institute ofLibrary and InformationProfessionals(2004). Information literacy: definition. 28Ekim 2010tarihinde http://www.cilip.org.uk/professionalguidance/informationliteracy/definition/ adresinden erişildi.
• Colorado Educational MediaAssociation.(1994).InformationLiteracy Guidelines, Denver:Colorado StateDepartment of Education. State Library and Adult Education Office. ED381163.
• Curzon,S. C.(ed.).(1995). Informationcompetenciesfinalreport:A reportsubmitted toCommissiononLearning Resources and Instructional TechnologyWorkGroup onInformationCompetenceCLRITTask 6.1. 29Ekim 2010tarihinde http://www.calstate.edu/AcadSen/Records/Reports/ic.shtmladresinden erişildi.
• Doyle,C. S.(1992). Outcome measures for information literacy within theNational EducationalGoalsof 1990. Finalreport to National ForumonInformation Literacy. Flagstaff, AZ: National ForumonInformation Literacy. (ED 351 033).
• Doyle,C. S.(1994). Informationliteracyinaninformationsociety: Aconceptforthe informationage.Syracuse, NY: ERIC ClearinghouseonInformation and Technology (ED372 763).
• Eisenberg,M. B.ve Berkowitz,R.E.(1992).Information problem-solving:The bigsix skillsapproach. School LibraryMedia Activities Monthly.8(5),27-29,37,42.
• Eisenberg,M.B.ve Berkowitz,R.E.(1999).Teaching informationandtechnology skills: TheBig6 in elementaryschools. Worthington,Ohio: The Book Report and Library Talk.
• Horton,F.W.(2008). Understandinginformation literacy: A primer. Paris:UNESCO.
• Iannuzzi, P.,Mangrum II,C. T. ve Strichart,S.S.(1999). Teachinginformationliteracy skills. Boston: Allyn andBacon.
• INFOhio.(2010). DIALOGEmodel for information literacy skills. The Information networkforOhioSchool.29 Ekim 2010 tarihinde http://www.infohio.org/ID/dialogue.htmladresindenerişildi.
• Irving,A. (1985). Study and informationskillsacross thecurriculum. London: HeinemannEducationalBooks.
• Jager,K.ve Nassimbeni,M.(2002)Institutionalizinginformationliteracy intertiary education: Lessons learnedfrom SouthAfricanprograms.Library Trends,51(2), 167-184.
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1987). Informationskillsforaninformationsociety: areview of research.Syracuse,NY: ERIC Clearinghouse onInformationResources (ED297 740).
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1995). The processof learningfrominformation.School Libraries Worldwide, 1(1), 1-12.
• Lau,J.(2006).Guidelines oninformation literacy for lifelong learning:finaldraft. IFLA.29 Ekim 2010 tarihindehttp://archive.ifla.org/VII/s42/pub/IL- Guidelines2006.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Lenox,M.F. ve Walker, M.L.(1993). Information literacy intrheeducational process. TheEducational Forum, 57(2), 312-324.
• Mckenzie, J. (1999). The research cycle 2000. From NowOn:TheEducational TechnologyJournal,9(4).http://questioning.org/rcycle.html
• Pinto,M.,Cordon, J. A. ve Diaz, R. G. (2010). Thirty yearsof information literacy (1977—2007):A terminological,conceptual and statisticalanalysisJournalof LibrarianshipandInformationScienceMarch 2010 42(1), 3-19.
• ThePraguedeclaration:towardsaninformationliterate society. (2003). 28 Ekim 2010 tarihinde http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/files/19636/11228863531PragueDeclaration.pdf/Prag ueDeclaration.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Rader,H. (1991a). Bibliographic instructionor information literacy. College and Research LibrariesNews, 51(1),18-20.
• Rader,H. B. (1991b). Information literacy: arevolutioninthelibrary. RQ, 31(1),25-28.
• Shapiro, J. J.,ve Hughes, S.K. (1996). Informationliteracy as aliberalart: enlightenmentproposals foranew curriculum. Educom Review 31(2) 28 Ekim 2010 tarihindehttp://www.educause.edu/pub/er/review/reviewArticles/31231.html adresinden erişildi.
• Snavely, L.ve Cooper, N. (1997). The information literacy debate. TheJournal of Academic Librarianship,23(1),9-13.
• Society of College,National andUniversityLibraries. (1999). Information skillsin highereducation: A SCONULpositionpaper.29 Ekim 2010 tarihinde http://www.sconul.ac.uk/groups/information_literacy/sp/papers/Seven_pillars2.pdf adresindenerişildi.
• Spitzer, K.L., Eisenberg,M.B. ve Lowe, C. A. (1998). Informationliteracy: essential skills for theinformationage.Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse.
• TürkDilKurumu.(2010). Büyük Türkçe sözlük.Ankara: TDK.
• University of Arizona Library (1996). Informationliteracy project:Project charge. 28 Ekim2010 tarihinde http://intranet.library.arizona.edu/archives/teams/infolit/CHARGE.HTMadresinden erişildi.
• Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). Theinformation service environment:relationships and priorities. (Report ED100391).WashingtonDC: National Commissionon Libraries andInformation Science.