SELF PRESENTATION IN FACE-TO-FACE AND SOCIAL NETWORKS: A FIELD RESEARCH ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Year 2023, , 792 - 802, 01.07.2023

Salih Tiryaki , Melis Karakuş , Emre Vadi Balcı

https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1275820

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study focuses on university students' self-presentation in face-to-face relationships and social media. Many factors affect self-presentation. Individual differences, gender, age and socio-demographic characteristics cause self-presentation to differ in face-to-face relations and social media. While the discussions in the literature focused on self-presentation in face-to-face relationships and recently self-presentation in social media, this study aimed to make sense of the differences in self-presentation according to the environments in terms of dimensions. For this purpose, a survey technique based on field research was used with university students living in Konya and a study was carried out with 417 students. As a result of the research, it was determined that self-presentation differed in social media and face-to-face relations according to gender and residence type, and there was no differentiation according to income and number of siblings.

Keywords

Self-Presentation, Social Media, Face-to-Face Relationships, University Students

YÜZ YÜZE VE SOSYAL AĞLARDAKİ İLİŞKİLERDE BENLİK SUNUMU: ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ALAN ARAŞTIRMASI

Abstract

Hangi Alandan Hakem Atanmalı: İletişim

ÖZ
Bu çalışma, üniversite öğrencilerinin yüz yüze ilişkiler ve sosyal medyadaki benlik sunumu üzerine odaklanmaktadır. Benlik sunumu üzerinde birçok faktör etkili olmaktadır. Bireysel farklılıklar, cinsiyet, yaş ve sosyo-demografik özellikler benlik sunumunun yüz yüze ilişkilerde ve sosyal medyada farklılaşmasına neden olmaktadır. Literatürdeki tartışmalar, yüz yüze ilişkilerdeki benlik sunumuna ve son dönemde sosyal medyadaki benlik sunumuna odaklanırken, bu çalışma benlik sunumundaki ortamlara göre farklılaşmaları boyutlarıyla anlamlandırmayı hedeflemiştir. Bu amaçla Konya’da yaşayan üniversite öğrencileri ile saha araştırmasına dayalı anket tekniği kullanılmış ve 417 öğrenci ile çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, cinsiyete ve ikamet şekline göre sosyal medya ve yüz yüze ilişkilerde benlik sunumunun farklılaştığı, gelir ve kardeş sayısına göre farklılaşma olmadığı belirlenmiştir.


SELF PRESENTATION IN FACE TO FACE RELATIONS AND SOCIAL MEDIA: A FIELD RESEARCH ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
ABSTRACT
This study focuses on university students' self-presentation in face-to-face relationships and social media. Many factors affect self-presentation. Individual differences, gender, age and socio-demographic characteristics cause self-presentation to differ in face-to-face relations and social media. While the discussions in the literature focused on self-presentation in face-to-face relationships and recently self-presentation in social media, this study aimed to make sense of the differences in self-presentation according to the environments in terms of dimensions. For this purpose, a survey technique based on field research was used with university students living in Konya and a study was carried out with 417 students. As a result of the research, it was determined that self-presentation differed in social media and face-to-face relations according to gender and residence type, and there was no differentiation according to income and number of siblings.

Keywords

Benlik Sunumu, Sosyal Medya, Yüz Yüze Ilişkiler, Üniversite Öğrencileri

References

• Aygül, H. H., Çelik, G. & Şensoy, A. F. (2018). Mahpus öğrencilerin benlik sunumları: Dramaturjik ilkeler, damga ve total kurum. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1 (45), 186-204.
• Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210–230.
• Boz, N. (2012). Yeni iletişim ortamlarında dijital kimlik ve benlik sunumu (Tez No. 317414) [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi. Ulusal Tez Merkezi].
• Caplan, S. E. (2005). A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication, 55, 721–736.
• Demir, Y. & Ayhan, B. (2020). Sosyal medyanın gündem belirleyicileri: Twitter’da gündem belirleme süreci üzerine bir sosyal ağ analizi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 51, 1-19.
• Dolezal, L. (2017). The phenomenology of self-presentation: describing the structures of intercorporeality with Erving Goffman. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (2), 237-254.
• Dominick, J. (1999). Who do you think you are? Personal home pages and self-presentation on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 646-658.
• Ellison, N., Heino, R. & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 415–441.
• Gibbs, J., Ellison, N. & Heino, R. (2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of Anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152–177.
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Press.
• Güler, Ş., Şahin, Y. & Balcı, E. V. (2022). Sosyal medyada çevrimiçi benlik sunumunun öznel iyi oluş üzerine etkisi: Instagram kullanıcıları üzerine bir araştırma. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 9 (1), 361-380.
• Güler, Ş. & Sezgin, M., (2020). Benlik Saygısı ve E-Katılım İlişkisi: Twitter Ekseninde Akademisyenlere Yönelik Bir Uygulama. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi., 49, 413- 438.
• Haferkamp, N. & Krämer, N. C. (2011) Social comparison 2.0: examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw., 14, 309–314.
• Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2021). Self-presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of Communication Research, 9, 80-98.
• Hülür, A. B. (2017). Erving Goffman: Günlük yaşamda benliğin sunumu, Abant Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi 2 (4),158-165.
• Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317-344.
• Lee, S.-J., Quigley, B. M., Nesler, M. S., Corbett, A. B. & Tedeschi, J. T. (1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26 (4), 701–722.
• Marshall, D. P. (2010). The promotion and presentation of the self: celebrity as marker of presentational media. Celebrity Studies 1 (1), 35–48.
• McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, A. S. & Gleason, M. E. J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues 58 (1), 9–31.
• Miller, B. (2020). A Picture is Worth 1000 Messages: Investigating Face and Body PhotosonMobile Dating Apps for Men Who Have Sex with Men. Journal of Homosexuality, 67 (13), 1798–1822. O'Donnell, K.J., Stuart, J. & Barber, B. L. (2021). The impact of social network site use on young adult development: extending the research beyond time use and considering the role of self-disclosure motivations”, Psychological Reports, doi: 10.1177/00332941211054766.
• Özkan, Ö. S., Durna, G. & Arzu, A. (2022). Psychometrıc evaluatıon of the turkısh versıon of the self-presentatıon tactıcs scale. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 24 (2), 779-800.
• Liu. P., Tov, W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J. & L. Qiu (2015). Do Facebook status updates reflect subjective well-being? Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw., 18 (7), 373-379.
• Pang, H. (2020). Examining associations between university students' mobile social media use, online self-presentation, social support and sense of belonging. Aslib Journal of Information Management.
• Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The presentation of self in virtual life: Characteristics of personal home pages. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79 (3), 643–660.
• Rui, J. & M.A. Stafanone (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study Computers in Human Behavior 29 (1), 110–18.
• Sezgin, M. & Güler, Ş. (2020). The Role of Digital Feedback on the Self-Esteem of Digital Natives., Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 35, 46-62.
• Schlenker, B. R. & Wowra, S. A. (2003). Carryover effects of feeling socially transparent or impenetrable on strategic self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (5), 871.
• Shim, M., Lee-Won, R. J. & Park, S. H. (2016). The self on the Net: the joint effect of self-construal and public self-consciousness on positive self-presentation in online social networking among South Korean college students Comput. Hum. Behav., 63, 530-539.
• Schlosser, A. (2019). Self-disclosure versus Self-presentation on Social Media. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 1-6.
• Šlerka, J. & Merunková, L. (2019). Goffman's theory as a framework for analysis of self-presentation on online social networks. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 2, 243-276.
• Smith, G. W. H. (2005). Enacted others: Specifying Goffman’s phenomenological omissions and sociological accomplishments. Human Studies, 28, 397–415.
• Smith, L. R. & Sanderson, J. (2015). I'm going to Instagram it! An analysis of athlete self-presentation on Instagram. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 342-358.
• Tedeschi, J. T. & Riess, M. (1981). Identities, The Phenomenal Self, and Laboratory Research. ed. James T. Tedeschi Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, Academic Press, s: 3-22.
• Tosun, Ü. & Akıncı, F. N. (2016). Sosyal ağ kullanan bireylerin benlik sunumu stratejilerinin incelenmesi. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi 8 (32), 27-60.
• Turner, M. & Ordonia, D. (2023). How COVID-19 Changed Self-Presentation on Instagram and its Relation to User Well-Being. Interacting with Computers, iwad013.
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 (1), 3–43.
• Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S. & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 24 (5), 1816–1836.
• Zheng, A., Duff, B. R., Vargas, P. & Yao, M. Z. (2020). Self-presentation on social media: When self-enhancement confronts self-verification. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20 (3), 289-302.
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hawes, T. & Pariz, J. (2021). A closer look at appearance and social media: Measuring activity, self-presentation, and social comparison and their associations with emotional adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media, 10 (1), 74-80.