Research Article

VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN'S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES'S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL

Volume: 16 Number: 1 January 1, 2026
EN TR

VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN'S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES'S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL

Abstract

This research aims to examine the visuals in preschool children's books from a semiotic perspective. In this study, illustrated children's books are considered not only as aesthetic elements supporting the text, but also as signs carrying social, cultural, and pedagogical meanings. The research was conducted using descriptive analysis and semiotic analysis approaches, which are qualitative research designs. The study group consists of two illustrated preschool children's books that were on the best-selling list in the children's category of an e-book sales platform and were selected between January and December 2025. The Semiotic Analysis Form, developed by the researcher, was used during the data collection process; six pages were selected from each book, and the visuals on these pages were examined based on the following dimensions: Signifier (object, color, character, place), Signified (denotation/initial meaning), Connotation (cultural association, emotion), Myth/Ideology (naturalized social messages), Text-visual relationship, and Message/emotion conveyed to the child. The analysis revealed that images in children's books are not merely aesthetic elements; they also convey various ideological and pedagogical messages, including gender roles, environmental awareness, family structure, friendship, and cultural identity. This finding demonstrates that images are powerful tools that influence children's perception of the world and their emotional and value development. The research highlights the importance of visual literacy and semiotic analysis in the field of children's literature and highlights the need for educators, parents, and authors and illustrators to produce and evaluate visual content more consciously.

Keywords

Semiotics, Children’s Literature, Picture Books, Visual Listeracy

Ethical Statement

There is no violation of research and publication ethics in this study.

References

  1. Aram, D. & Biron, S. (2004). Joint storybook reading and joint writing interventions among low SES preschoolers: Differential contributions to early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(4), 588-610.
  2. Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology. Hill and Wang.
  3. Barthes, R. (1970). The empire of signs. Hill and Wang.
  4. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, music, text. (S. Heath, Ed.) The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (Vol. 37, p. 220). Hill and Wang. Doi:10.2307/429854 Image, music, text.
  5. Barthes, R. (1980). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
  6. Barthes, R. (2016). Göstergebilimsel serüven (M. Rifat & S. Rifat, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  7. Barthes, R. (2017). Çağdaş Söylenler (T. Yücel, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  8. Bassa, Z. (2013). Çocuk Kitaplarında Resimleme. Çocuk Edebiyatı. (Ed. Mübeccel Gönen). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
  9. Brown, R. (2017). Baba ile bir gün. Ankara: Binbir Çiçek Kitaplar Yayınevi.
  10. Carle, E. (2023). Aç Tırtıl. İstanbul: Mavibulut Yayıncılık.
APA
Arifoğlu, G. (2026). VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 16(1), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1797643
AMA
1.Arifoğlu G. VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL. TOJDAC. 2026;16(1):205-218. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1797643
Chicago
Arifoğlu, Gökçe. 2026. “VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 16 (1): 205-18. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1797643.
EndNote
Arifoğlu G (January 1, 2026) VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 16 1 205–218.
IEEE
[1]G. Arifoğlu, “VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL”, TOJDAC, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 205–218, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.7456/tojdac.1797643.
ISNAD
Arifoğlu, Gökçe. “VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication 16/1 (January 1, 2026): 205-218. https://doi.org/10.7456/tojdac.1797643.
JAMA
1.Arifoğlu G. VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL. TOJDAC. 2026;16:205–218.
MLA
Arifoğlu, Gökçe. “VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL”. The Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, vol. 16, no. 1, Jan. 2026, pp. 205-18, doi:10.7456/tojdac.1797643.
Vancouver
1.Gökçe Arifoğlu. VISUAL CODES AND MEANING PRODUCTION IN CHILDREN’S LITERATURE: A STUDY WITH BARTHES’S SEMIOTIC ANALYSIS MODEL. TOJDAC. 2026 Jan. 1;16(1):205-18. doi:10.7456/tojdac.1797643