BİR KATILIM ARACI OLARAK KENTSEL TASARIM: MEDELLİN MUCİZESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 19 - 36, 01.01.2018

Evrim Töre Öznur Çağlayan

https://doi.org/10.7456/10801100/003

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Karar alma süreçlerinde katılım olgusu gelişmiş ülkelerin yanı sıra
gelişmekte olan coğrafyalarda da tartışılmaktadır. Katılımın kimin için ve
nasıl sağlanabileceğine dair tartışmalarda, toplulukların güçlendirilmesinin
önemine dikkat çekilmektedir. Bu makalede ele alınan örnek ise bir Latin
Amerika ülkesi olan Kolombiya’da yer alan Medellin kentidir. 1940’ların
sonlarından itibaren süregelen şiddet dalgası, Medellin’de ekonomik sorunlarla
birleşerek adeta bir sorun sarmalı yaratmıştır. Bu sarmalın çözümü 1990’lardan
itibaren hayata geçirilen sosyal şehircilik politikaları ve buna bağlı kentsel
entegrasyon projeleri bağlamında gerçekleşmiştir. Söz konusu politikaların
nasıl hayata geçirilebileceği ise, üç bileşenli ve beş aşamalı bir kurguyu
ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu makalede, üst çerçeveyi tanımlayan kısa bir aktarımın
ardından, tespit edilen sorunlu alanlar arasında ilk sırada yer alan Kuzeydoğu
Komünü’nde uygulanan Kentsel Entegrasyon Projesi (KEP), tüm aşamalar ve
bileşenler bağlamında detaylı olarak açılmaktadır. Teşhis, planlama, tasarım,
uygulama ve aktivasyon fazlarının her birinde; fizik mekâna, katılıma ve
koordinasyona ilişkin doneler net bir şekilde okunabilmektedir. Söz konusu
okuma, tasarımın amaç değil, katılımı sağlamak, toplulukları güçlendirmek için
kullanılan bir araç olduğu değerli bir örnek sunmaktadır.    

Keywords

Medellin, kentsel tasarım, kentsel entegrasyon projesi, katılım

References

• Abbott, J. (1996). Sharing the City. CommunityParticipation in Urban Management, UK: Earthscan.
• Acosta Restrepo, P. (2016). Learning from the Bottom Up, F. Magalhaes (der.) Slum Upgrading and Housing in Latin America (s.61-99), Inter-American Development Bank
• Arango, B. (2015) Graffitour, una fiesta de color y vida en la comuna 13 de Medellín, CROMOS, https://cromos.elespectador.com/cultura/coloreando-la-vida-en-la-comuna-13-17798
• Arnstein, S.R. (1969). “A Ladder of Citizen Participation”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 4, 216–44.
• Atkinson, R. (2005). “Kentsel Dönüşüm, Ortaklıklar ve Yerel Katılım: İngiltere Deneyimi”,Uluslararası Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamaları Sempozyumu İstanbul 2004 Bildiriler Kitabı, 87–98.
• Andres Osorio Gaviria, D. (2015) The Northeastern Urban Integration Project [PUI] Medellín, Colombia, Urban Development Agency [EDU], http://www.academia.edu/26807633/The_Northeastern_Urban_Integration_Project_PUI_MEDELL%C3%8DN_COLOMBIA_-_Urban_Development_Agency_EDU_
• Betancur, J.J. (2007).“Approaches To The Regularization Of Informal Settlements: The Case Of Primed in Medellin, Colombia”,Global Urban Development, Volume 3 Issue 1 November 2007.
• Blanco, C. & Kobayashi, H. (2009). “Urban Transformation In Slum Districts Through Public Space Generation And Cable Transportation At Northeastern Area: Medellin, Colombia”, The Journal of International Social Research, Volume 2 / 8 Summer 2009, 75–90.
• Calderon, C.A.A. (2008). Learning from Slum Upgrading and Participation. A case study of participatory slum upgrading in the emergence of new governance in the city of Medellín–Colombia, KTH, Department of Urban Planning and Environment Division of Environmental Strategies Research – fms, Degree Project SoM EX 2008-18, Stockholm.
• Calderon, C. (2012). Social Urbanism - Integrated and participatory urban upgrading in Medellin, Colombia. In R. J. Lawrence, H. Turgut & P. Kellett (der.), Requalifying the Built Environment: Challenges and Responses (pp. 179-198). Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing.
• Carracedo García-Villalba, O. (2013) Regenerating neighborhoods through identity and community places Planning and developing strategies for resilient informal settlements, 7th Conference of the International Forum on Urbanism. IFOU. Tainan. Taiwan.
• Carracedo García-Villalba, O. (2014). Shaping informality. The role of street-based strategies in revitalizing informal and low-income areas, 7th International Urban Design Conference Designing Productive Cities – 2014, Conference Proceedings Peer Reviewed, Association for Sustainability in Business Inc., ISBN: 978-1-922232-20-5
• Carter, A. (2000). “Strategy and Partnership in Urban Regeneration”, Roberts, P ve Skyes, H. (der.),Urban Regeneration: A Handbook (s.37-58), London: Sage Publications, 37–58.
• Castello, G.,GurzaLavalle, A., Houtzager, P.P. (2007). “Civil Organizations and Political Representation in Brazil’s Participator Institutions”, A. Cornwall ve Vera S.C.C. (der.) Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas (s.114-130), Londra: ZedBooks.
• Choguill, M.B.G. (1996). A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries, Habitat Int, 20(3),431–444.
• Cornwall, A. & Coelho, V.S.P. (2007). “Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New DemocraticArenas”, A. Cornwall ve Vera S.C.C. (der.),Spaces for Change? The Politics of CitizenParticipation in New Democratic Arenas (s.1-32), Londra: ZedBooks
• Das, A.K. & Takahashi ,L.M. (2009). Evolving institutional arrangements, scaling up, and sustainability emerging issues in participatory slum upgrading in Ahmedabad, India, J.Plan.Educ.Res, 29 (2), 213–232.
• Davilla, J.D. & Daste,D. (2011). Poverty, participation and aerial cable-cars: A case study of Medellín, 12th NAERUS Annual Conference ‘The city at a human scale’, Faculty of Architecture, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid 20-22 October 2011, https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/ds2/stream/?#/documents/47914/page/1 EDU (2017). http://www.edu.gov.co/site/actualidad/1691-57-nuevas-familias-ingresaron-al-censo-de-vivienda-de-naranjal, (son erişim tarihi 09.12.2017)
• Fandino, S. (2010). “Community Participation and the Sustainability of the Settlement Upgrading Process”, E. Rojas (ed.) Building Cities Neighbourhood Upgradind and Urban Quality of Life. Washington: IDB.
• Geisinger, J. (2013) Connective Spaces and Social Capital in Medellín,The Architectural League NY, http://archleague.org/2013/03/connective-spaces-and-social-capital-in-medellin-by-jeff-geisinger/
• Hassan, G.F., El Hefnawi, A., El Refaie, M. (2011). “Efficiency of participation in planning”, Alexandria Engineering Journal (2011) 50, 203–212.
• Hastings, A. (1996). “Unravelling the process of 'partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy”, Urban Studies, 33, 253–268.
• Henderson, P. (2005). Including the Excluded: From Practice to Policy in European Community Development. Bristol: PolicyPress.
• Hou, J. (2011) “Citizen design Participation and Beyond”, Companion to Urban Design içinde, Banerjee T & Loukaitou-Sideris A (der.), London: Routledge.
• Ismail, A. (2011). “The Technical Training Resource Centre (TTRC): building community architects”, International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), Vol 23(1): 183–193. DOI: 10.1177/0956247810396057
• Ismail, WAW, Said, I (2015). Integrating the Community in Urban Design and Planning of Public Spaces: A review in Malaysiancities, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 168 (2015) 357 – 364.
• Lee, C.M., Lee, J.H., Yim, C.H. (2003). “A Revenue-sharing Model of Residential Redevelopment Projects: The Case of the Hapdong Redevelopment Scheme in Seoul, Korea”,Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 11, 2223–2237.
• Layson, J.P. & Nankai, X. (2015). “Public participation and satisfaction in urban regeneration projects in Tanzania: The case of Kariakoo, Dar es Salaam”, Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 3:1, 68-87, DOI: 10.1080/21650020.2015.1045623
• Maclean, K. (2014) The ‘Medellín Miracle’: The politics of crisis, elites and coalitions, research Paper 24, Developmental Leadership Program.
• Magalhaes, F. (2016). “Critical Policy Choices in Slum Upgrading”, F. Magalhaes (der.) Slum Upgrading and Housing in Latin America (s.1-11), Inter-American Development Bank.
• McCarthy, J. (2005), “Kentsel Dönüşümde Ortaklık Pratiği”, Özdemir, D. A., Özden P. P., Özdemir, D. A., Özden P. P. ve
• Turgut, S. R. (der.), Uluslararası Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamaları Sempozyumu İstanbul 2004 Bildiriler Kitabı, İstanbul: Küçükçekmece Belediyesi Yayınları Tayf Matbaası.
• McEwan, C. (2002) “Bringing government to the people: women, local governance and community participation in South Africa”, Geoforum 34 (2003) 469–481.
• Mohanty, R. (2007). “Gendered Subjects, the State and Participatory Spaces: The Politics of Domesticating Participation in Rural India”, A. Cornwall ve Vera S.C.C. (der.),Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas (s.76-94), Londra: ZedBooks.
• Perkins, D.D., Florin, P., Rich, R.C., Wandersman, A., Cbavis, D.M. (1990). “Participation and the Social and Physical Environment of Residential Blocks: Crime and Community Context”, American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 1.
• Rios, M. (2008). “Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design,” Journal of Urban Design, 13(2): 213–229.
• Rodgers, D. (2007). “Subverting the Spaces of Invitation? Local Politics and Participatory Budgeting in Post-Crisis Buenos Aires”, A. Cornwall ve Vera S.C.C. (der.), Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, Londra: ZedBooks.
• Sadiqi, Z.,Trigunarsyah, B. ve Coffey, V. (2017). “Framework for community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction projects: A case of Afghanistan”, International Journal of Project Management 35 (2017) 900–912.
• Sanoff, H. (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
• Sotomayor, L. (2017). “Dealing with Dangerous Spaces. The Construction of Urban Policy in Medellín”, Latin American Perspectives, Issue 213, Vol. 44 No. 2, March 2017, 71–90, DOI: 10.1177/0094582X16682758
• Swapan, M.S.H. (2014). “Realities of community participation in metropolitan planning in Bangladesh: A comparative study of citizens and planning practitioners’ perceptions”, Habitat International 43 (2014) 191–197.
• Trujillo, T. A. (2012) Spatial and process strategies toward the formalization and integration of the informal settlement, Villa 31, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning University of Washington, Department of Urban Design and Planning.
• UN-Habitat (2003). The Challenge of Slums. Global Report on Human Settlements 2003. United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Sterling: EARTHSCAN.
• Williams, J.J. (2007). “Social Change and CommunityParticipation: The Case of Health Facilities Boards in the Western Cape of South Africa”, A. Cornwall ve Vera S.C.C. (der.),Spaces for Change? The Politics of Citizen Participation in New DemocraticArenas (s.95-113), Londra: ZedBooks.
• WSJ (2012). City of the Year Medellin, WSJ, online.wsj.com/ad/cityoftheyear, (son erişim tarihi 12.09.2017). Valladares, A. (2017). “Successes and failures of participation-in-design: Cases from Old Havana, Cuba”, Frontiers of Architectural Research (2017) 6, 401–411.