UZEP: A CLOUD-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION PLATFORM FOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Abstract
Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic has affected higher education institutions all over the world, causing face-toface education to cease. Schools have tried to carry out educational activities through online teaching either by using on premise infrastructure or by leasing cloud based online platforms. Although these platforms are convenient, most of them do not meet all the requirements for higher education institutions. Not knowing where the personal data is stored in a public cloud creates another problem for some countries according to laws. In this study, a new online learning platform has been developed for higher education institutions to solve these problems using state-of-the-art cloud technologies. The new system enables implementation of individual curricula of many higher education institutions in one software system, and it can be taken into service quickly in emergencies. It expands dynamically by activating a large number of streaming servers to meet the demand. The new system provides easy to use-learn interfaces, offers an economical solution for e-learning by sharing the resources, and compliant with the law on protection of personal data. The new platform was in service at 12 universities in Turkiye during the fall 2020, and its performance was measured with surveys at various levels.
Keywords
Distance education, Internet based online learning, online assessment, educational technology, Covid-19
Supporting Institution
Tübitak
Project Number
120K200
Thanks
This research was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the Grant No:120K200 and Title: “A New Distance Education Model and Application Platform in Higher Education”.
References
- Akbulut Y., Kuzu A., Latchem C., Odabasi F. (2007). Change readiness among teaching staff at Anadolu University, Turkey. Distance Education, 28, 335-350.
- Bozkurt A., Sharma R. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to coronavirus pandemic, 15, i–vi.
- Lee K., Fanguy M., Lu X.S., Bligh B. (2021). Student learning during covid-19: It was not as bad as we feared. Distance Education, 42(1), 164-172.
- Moore M.G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.
- Bonk C.J. (2020). Pandemic ponderings, 30 years to today: synchronous signals, saviors, or survivors? Distance Education, 41(4),589-599.
- Moore M., Kearsley G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. What’s New in Education, Cengage Learning.
- Keegan D. (1996). Foundations of Distance Education. Routledge education books, Routledge.
- Escobar-Rodriguez T., Monge-Lozano P. (2012). The acceptance of moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085–1093.
- De Medio C., Limongelli C., Sciarrone F., Temperini M. (2020). Moodlerec: A recommendation system for creating courses using the moodle e-learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106168.
- S´anchez R.A., Hueros A.D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of moodle using tam. Computers in human behavior, 26(6), 1632-1640.