BEYOND TRADITIONAL LEARNING: A HEUTAGOGICAL APPROACH TO ONLINE LEARNING FOR DOCTORAL STUDENTS

Year 2026, Volume: 27 Issue: 2 , 204 - 223 , 01.04.2026

Johan Syahbrudin , Anita Anggraini , Ismu Sukamto , Sulasmi Sulasmi , Titin Hera Widi Handayani

https://izlik.org/JA49LX89PG

Abstract

Interest in online learning has grown over the past decades, with the heutagogical approach gaining traction, especially in doctoral programs requiring learner autonomy. This study aims to explore doctoral students’ lived experiences with the heutagogical approach in online learning, including their perceptions of its effectiveness and their interpretation of learning outcomes and quality assurance processes. Using a phenomenological design, data were collected from graduate students at Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, through indepth interviews and classroom observations over one semester. Observations revealed three key phases: (1) design (students co-developed learning objectives and project scopes aligned with their dissertations); (2) development (students conducted self-directed research with weekly discussions and iterative feedback); and (3) implementation (peer evaluations and final project submission for formal review). Students perceived the approach as effective, recognizing its flexibility and autonomy, while also acknowledging challenges such as demands for self-regulation, technical constraints, and limited face-to-face interaction. The approach proved effective in balancing independent learning with academic achievement, reflected in scientific publications and intellectual property rights. This study highlights the heutagogical approach as a viable pedagogical model for doctoral online learning, emphasizing the critical balance between learner autonomy, structured guidance, and institutional support to ensure sustained academic excellence.

Keywords

Heutagogy approach , online learning , doctoral education , self-directed learning , phenomenological research

References

• Abdullah, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2022). Engaging and empowering Malaysian students through open and distance learning in the post-covid era. Frontiers in Education, 7, 853796. https://doi. org/10.3389/feduc.2022.853796
• Agonacs, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Heutagogy and self-determined learning: A review of the published literature on the application and implementation of the theory. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 34(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1562329
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. www.favazza.com
• Athanases, S. Z., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2014). Scaffolding versus routine support for latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14535328
• Atkinson, J. (2002). Four steps to analyse data from a case study method. ACIS 2002 Proceedings. http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2002/38