Effects Of Students’ Characteristics On Online Learning Readiness: A Vocational College Example
Abstract
Educational institutions rapidly adopt concepts and practices of online learning systems for students. But many institutions’ online learning programs face enormous difficulty in achieving successful strategies. It is essential to evaluate its different aspects and understand factors which influence its effectiveness. Readiness stands out among the variables that influence online learning effectiveness. Therefore, it is important to examine online learning readiness (OLR) and students’ characteristics that affect OLR. This paper reports relationship between student characteristics and OLR at vocational college. Quantitative method was used to collect relevant data in this study. Hung et al.’s Online Learning Readiness Scale (OLRS) was administered to 725 vocational college students, in Balıkesir. OLRS has 18 items grouped into five factors; computer/Internet self-efficacy (CIS), self-directed learning (SDL), learner control (LC), motivation for learning (ML), and online communication self-efficacy (OCS). t-test and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were used to determine if there were significant differences in online learning readiness across the students’ characteristics. The study revealed that students surveyed overall ready for online learning but they need to improve themselves especially in CIS and OCS in order to be successful at online learning. Students’ characteristics (PC ownership, department, type of high school graduation) significantly affect learners’ in some dimensions of OLRS especially CIS dimension. The research findings were discussed in line with the literature and some suggestions were presented for further research and researchers.
Keywords
Online Learning Readiness, Vocational College, Readiness Factors
References
- Aydin, C. H. & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring Readiness for e-Learning: Reflections from an
- Emerging Country. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (4), 244-257. Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K. & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260.
- Borgman, C.L. Gallagher, A.L. Hirsch, S.G. & Walter, V.A. (1995). Children’s searching behaviours on browsing and keyword online catalogs: The science library catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 46 (9), 663-684.
- Bowles, M. (2004). Relearning to E-learn: strategies for electronic learning and knowledge. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
- Chao R-J. & Chen, Y-H. (2009). Evaluation of the criteria and effectiveness of distance e- learning with consistent fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 10657–10662.
- Guglielmino, P. & Guglielmino, L. (2003). Are your learners ready for e-learning? In G.
- Piskurich (Ed.), The AMA handbook of e-learning. New York: American Management Association. Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6–10.
- Hogo, M. A. (2010). Evaluation of E-Learning systems based on fuzzy clustering models and statistical tools. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 6891-6903.
- Hsu, Y. C. & Shiue, Y. M. (2005). The effect of self-directed learning readiness on achievement comparing face-to-face and two-way distance learning instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32 (2), 143-155.
- Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C. & Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: