A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education

Volume: 14 Number: 1 March 1, 2013
Nima Hemmatı , Soghra Omranı , Naser Hemmatı
EN TR

A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the satisfaction and effectiveness of Internet-based learning (IBL) and traditional classroom lecture (TCL) for continuing medical education (CME) programs by comparing final resuscitation exam results of physicians who received the newest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) curriculum guidelines training either by traditional or by an Internet-based CME. A randomized two-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used. Postgraduate general physician trainees of Iran medical schools were participated. Two methods were compared for teaching the newest curriculum guidelines of the American Heart Association: lecture method in which the teacher follows a Power point presentation with linear layout, and with interactive self-assessment and Scenario-based learning, feedback, multimedia with linear and nonlinear layout with the same power point presentation as lecture in terms of text and photography. The data on final CPR exam grades, collected both groups trained physicians, were obtained for a total of 80 physicians in 2011. An independent sample t-test analysis indicated that participants in the IBL format reported significantly higher mean ratings for this format (62.5 ±2.32) than TCL format (54.6±2.18) (p=.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in cognitive gains (p

Keywords

Internet-based learning, Traditional classroom lecture, continuing Medical Education, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

References

  1. Faghihi SH., Farokhinia F. (2003). Periodontal Infectious Diseases as a Risk Factor in
  2. Cardiovascular Diseases. Journal of Dentistry (Shiraz University of Medical Sciences); 4(2 (7)):71-79. Badger, T. & Rawstorne, D. (1998). An evaluative study of pre-registration nursing students’ skills in basic life support. Nurse Education Today; 18: 231-236.
  3. Bishop TM. The return on investment in online education. J Vet Med Educ. 2007; 34(3):257-62.United Kingdom Central Council. Fitness for practice, The UKCC
  4. Commission for Nursing and Midwifery Education (Peach Report), London: UKCC. 1999.
  5. Bradshaw, C., & Dale, C. (1999). Informed choice. Nursing Management; 6 (3): 8-12.
  6. Creutzfeldt J, Hedman L, Medin C, Wallin C. J, Felländer-Tsai L. (2008): Effects of repeated CPR training in virtual worlds on medical students' performance. Stud Health Technol Inform; 132: 89–94.
  7. Department of Health. (2000). A health service of all the talents: developing the NHS) workforce, London: Department of Health.
  8. Edwards, M., & Hannah, K. (1985). An examination of the use of interactive videodisc
  9. CPR instruction for the lay community. Computers in Nursing; 3 (6): 250-252. Engum S, Jeffries P, Fisher L.(2003). Intravenous catheter training system: Computer- based education versus traditional learning methods. American Journal of Surgery; 186: 67- 74.
  10. Friedman, R. B. (n.d.). Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education. Acad. Med. Garcia-Barbero M, Caturla-Such J. (1999). What are we doing in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in Europe? An analysis of a survey. Resuscitation; 41: 225–36.
APA
Hemmatı, N., Omranı, S., & Hemmatı, N. (2013). A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 256-265. https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM
AMA
1.Hemmatı N, Omranı S, Hemmatı N. A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education. TOJDE. 2013;14(1):256-265. https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM
Chicago
Hemmatı, Nima, Soghra Omranı, and Naser Hemmatı. 2013. “A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 14 (1): 256-65. https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM.
EndNote
Hemmatı N, Omranı S, Hemmatı N (March 1, 2013) A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 14 1 256–265.
IEEE
[1]N. Hemmatı, S. Omranı, and N. Hemmatı, “A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education”, TOJDE, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 256–265, Mar. 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM
ISNAD
Hemmatı, Nima - Omranı, Soghra - Hemmatı, Naser. “A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 14/1 (March 1, 2013): 256-265. https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM.
JAMA
1.Hemmatı N, Omranı S, Hemmatı N. A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education. TOJDE. 2013;14:256–265.
MLA
Hemmatı, Nima, et al. “A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 14, no. 1, Mar. 2013, pp. 256-65, https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM.
Vancouver
1.Nima Hemmatı, Soghra Omranı, Naser Hemmatı. A Comparison Of Internet-Based Learning And Traditional Classroom Lecture To Learn Cpr For Continuing Medical Education. TOJDE [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 1;14(1):256-65. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA48EF32LM