Meaningful Engagement In Facebook Learning Environments: Merging Social And Academic Lives
Abstract
This study compared the effectiveness of different learning environments between interactive Facebook instructional method and non-Facebook instructional method for undergraduate students. Two outcome dimensions were measured: student grades and learning engagement. A preprest-posttest control group experimental design was used. The experimental group (n= 134) received the interactive Facebook instructional method, and the control group students (n= 57) received the non-Facebook instructional method. Data pertaining to student Facebook use and activities were also collected. Independent samples t-tests were used to measure significant differences in grades and engagement between the Facebook and non-Facebook classroom contexts. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to measure the relationships between interactive Facebook instructional method and grades. A linear regression was also performed to analyze the predictors of student grades. Content analyses of samples of Facebook communication exchanges were also conducted. The results revealed that experimental group had a significant positive effect on grades and engagement. This study concludes that Facebook use in instructional method assists students in achieving better grades, higher engagement, and greater satisfaction with the university learning experience. Thus, the authors provides experimental evidence that Facebook can be used as an educational communication and interaction tool to enable faculty to assume a more active and participatory role.
Keywords
Engagement Learning, Facebook, Learning Outcomes, Social Network, Web 2.0
References
- Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71-80.
- Alexander, B. (2006, March/April). A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. Educause, 33-34.
- Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education.
- Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308. Banquil, K. et al. (2009). Social networking sites affect one’s academic performances adversely. Retrieved June 2, 2012, from http://www.scribd.com/doc/28919575/SOCIAL-NETWORKING-SITES-AFFECT
- ONE%E2%80%99S-ACADEMIC-PERFORMANCE-ADVERSELY Blattner, G. & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ITDL), 6(1), 17-28.
- Boulos, M. N. & Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24, 2-23.
- Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
- Chen, P. D., Guidry, K. R., & Lambert, A. D. (2009). Engaging online learners: A quantitative study of postsecondary student engagement in the online learning environment. Paper presented at the 2009 American Educational Research Association
- Annual Conference. San Diego, CA. Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010).Engaging online learners: The impacts of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54, 1222-1232.
- Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1337-1343.