Students’ Attitudes Towards Webct Applications In Selected Courses
Abstract
Keywords
Edutainment, Entertainment, Marketing Education, Experiential Learning, E-Learning And Webct
References
- Aikem, M., Vanjani, M., Ray, B. and Martin, J. (2003). College Students Internet Use.
- Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20 (5), 182-185. Carswell, A. D., and Venkatesh, V. (2002). Learner outcomes in an asynchronous distance education environment. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 56, 475–
- Chiu, C. M.,and Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task values. Information & Management, 45, 194-201.
- Clark, J. (2002). A product review of WebCT. Internet and Higher Education 5, 79-82.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), 319-340.
- Fletcher, K. M. (2005). Self-efficacy as an evaluation measure for programs in support of online learning literacies for undergraduates. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 307-322.
- Gegez, A. E. (2005). Pazarlama Arastirmalari. Istanbul: Beta.
- Hightower, B. Rawl, C. and Schutt, M. (2008). Collaborations for delivering the library to students through WebCT. Reference Services Review, 35 (4), 541-551.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The implication of electronic computers to factor analysis.
- Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20: 141-151. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrics, 39, 31-36.