The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education

Sami Sahın

EN

The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education

Abstract

Distance education and web-based courses are mainstream in the United States higher education and growing (NCES, 2003) involving over 80% of four year public universities in 2002. The National Academy of Science review of “how people learn” suggests that technology-mediated learning can be used to respond to students’ preferences and related characteristics. This investigation of the relationships between learners’ characteristics and their perception of web-based learning and satisfaction with their course used Kolb’s (1984) Learning Styles Inventory and Walker’s (2003) distance education learning environment instrument plus demographic questions to survey 279 students in five web-based undergraduate courses in a Midwestern university. The study founds that the three dimensions of Moore’s Transactional Distance Theory may be linked with Kolb’s two dimensional views of individual learning styles. For example, introductory biology courses with high structure are perceived as more satisfactory by students who prefer a more “abstract conceptual” learning style for “knowledge grasping.” The author recommends that courses are designed to accommodate multiple learning styles with variety on all dimensions of transactional distance.

Keywords

Distance Learning, Learning Styles, Transactional Distance.

References

Alomyan, H., & Au, W. (2004). Exploration of instructional strategies and individual difference within the context of Web-based learning. International Education Journal, (4), 86-91.
Anderson, T. (1997). Integrating lectures and electronic course materials. Innovations in Education and Training International, 34(1), 24 - 31.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace.
Carnevale, D. (2000). ―Accrediting bodies consider new standards‖. Education at a
Distance, 14(8), Retrieved January 12, 2005 from http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/AUG00_Issue/PDF/accrediting.pdf
Chute, A. G., Thompson, M. M., & Hancock, B. W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dick, W. & Cary, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction, (3rd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Federico, P. (2000). Learning styles and student attitudes toward various aspects of network-based instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 359–379.
Freeth, B. (2004). Tool for evaluation of Web-based instruction. Retrieved March 3, from http://home.earthlink.net/~bfree8725/webevaltool.pdf
Garrison, D. R. (2000). ―Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: a shift from structural to transactional issues‖. International Review of

Research in Open and Distance Learning,1(1). Retrieved March 3, 2005 from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v1.1/randy.pdf
Hart, G. (1995). Learning styles and hypertext: exploring user attitudes. Retrieved February 10, 2005 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne95/smtu/papers/hart.pdf
Henke, H. (1997). Evaluating Web-based instruction design. Retrieved 9 January, 2005 from http://www.scis.nova.edu/~henkeh/story1.htm
Hills, H. (2003). Individual preferences in e-learning. Burlington, VT: Gower.
Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning: design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey: Information Science.
Kolb, D. A., (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.
Kolb, D. A., (1984). Experiential learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C., (2001). Experiential learning theory:
Previous research and new directions. In R. Sternberg, & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, p. 227-247. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association. Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb learning style inventory, version 3. Boston: Hay Group.
Kolb, A. Y. and D.A. Kolb (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory – Version 3.1, 2005
Technical Specifications. Retrieved February 10, 2006 from http://www.learningfromexperience.com
Koohang, A, Durante, A. (2003). Learners‘ perceptions toward the Web-based distance learning activities/assignments portion of an undergraduate hybrid instructional model. Journal of Information Technology Education, 105-113.
Laurillard, D. (2001). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.
Lee, Y., Driscoll, M., and Nelson, D. (2004). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 225-242.
Lynch, M. M. (2002). The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom.
New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Mason, R. (1994). Using communications media in open and flexible learning. London: Kogan Page.
Mason, R. and Weller, M. (2000). Factors affecting students' satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173-200.
MeBmer, R. M., & Schmitz, S. (2004). Gender demands on e-learning. In K. Morgan, C.
A. Brebbia, J. Sanchez & A. Voiskounsky (Eds.), Human perspectives in the Internet society: culture, psychology and gender, 245-254. Southampton, UK: WIT Press. Mertler, C. A., & Vannata, R. A. (2002). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods:
Practical application and interpretation advanced and multivariate statistical methods (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak publishing. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. New York: Routledge, 22-38.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Distance education: a learning system. Lifelong Learning, 8-11.
Moore, M. and Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view, (2nd Ed.).
Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth. National Education Association, (2000). Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Retrieved January 9, 2005 from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf
NCES, (2003). Distance education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000–
Retrieved February 18, 2005 from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/2003017
Oh, E., & Lim, D. (2005). Cross relationship between cognitive styles and learner variables in online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 66.
Romiszowski, A. (2004). How‘s the e-learning baby? Factors leading to success or failure of an educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 44(1), 5–27.
Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 443-454. Savicki, V., Dawn, L., & Merle, K. (1996). "Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2(3).
Retrieved February 22, 2005 from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/savicki.html
Schwitzer, A. M., Ancis, J. R., & Bown, N. (2001). Promoting student learning and student development at a distance. Lanham, MD: American College Personnel Association.
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
Smith, P.L. & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
Sussman, N. M., & Tyson, D. H. (2000). Sex and power. Gender differences in computer- mediated interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(3), 381-394.
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. NY: HarperCollins.
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), The State of the World's Children 2004 (New York: UNICEF, 2003).
Walker, S. (2003). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey (DELES). Unpublished Doctor of Science Education Thesis, Curtin
University of Technology, Perth. Retrieved February 22, 2005 from http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20040211.095711
Weiten, W. (1989). Pshychology: themes and variations. Belmont, California:
Brooks/Cole publishing. Willcoxson, L., Prosser, M. (1996) "Kolb‘s Learning Style Inventory (1985): Review and further study of validity and reliability" British Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 257

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Sami Sahın This is me

Publication Date

March 1, 2008

Submission Date

February 27, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2008 Volume: 9 Number: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY

APA

Sahın, S. (2008). The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(1), 123-138. https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY

AMA

1.Sahın S. The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education. TOJDE. 2008;9(1):123-138. https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY

Chicago

Sahın, Sami. 2008. “The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9 (1): 123-38. https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY.

EndNote

Sahın S (March 1, 2008) The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9 1 123–138.

IEEE

[1]S. Sahın, “The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education”, TOJDE, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123–138, Mar. 2008, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY

ISNAD

Sahın, Sami. “The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 9/1 (March 1, 2008): 123-138. https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY.

JAMA

1.Sahın S. The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education. TOJDE. 2008;9:123–138.

MLA

Sahın, Sami. “The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 9, no. 1, Mar. 2008, pp. 123-38, https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY.

Vancouver

1.Sami Sahın. The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education. TOJDE [Internet]. 2008 Mar. 1;9(1):123-38. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA24KT23YY

The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Including Learning Styles and Their Perceptions and Satisfaction in Web-Based Courses in Higher Education

Abstract

Keywords

Abstract

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

IZ

Cite