New Trends Of Measurement And Assessment In Distance Education

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 206 - 217, 01.03.2014

Zeki Kaya Seref Tan

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.30398

Cited By: 8

Abstract

Distance education is a discipline that offers solutions to some important education problems. Distance education, contribute to the solution to the problems such as; inequality of opportunities, lifelong education, the implementation of a series of individual and social goals that can contribute to and benefit from educational technology and self-learning. In distance education, methods of measurement and assessment must be consistent with the objectives and contents of teaching. A major interest of formative assessment is determining the students’ learning level of each behavior in the interested unit. In summative assessment, performances of students on some units are measured broader than formative assessment. A computerized adaptive testing, CAT, is the test managed by computer in which each item is introduced and the decision to stop are dynamically imposed based on the students answers and his/her estimated knowledge level. In CAT applications, students do not take the same test. Despite item numbers and properties of items are different for the students; the precise of measures improves in positioning students on an ability or success continuum in CAT applications. In CAT applications, questions answered by a student depend on the student's ability or learning level. In item response theory, there are some models to estimate a student’s ability level, such as three-parameter logistic model. Cheating in exams or other academic assignments can be defined as use resources not allowed to use or having someone else to take exams or assignments. Some precautions must be taken about cheating such as a live proctoring, using web cams, and using a plagiarism detection program.

Keywords

Distance Education, Computerized Adaptive Testing, Online Testing, Item Response Theory, Preventing Cheating, Measurement And Assessment.

References

• Alkan, C. (1981), “Açık Üniversite [Open University]”, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Sayı 1-2.
• Alkan, C. (1987), Açıköğretim Uzaktan Eğitim Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak
• İncelenmesi [Comperatively Analyisi of Distance Education Systems], Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları No 157. Chen, C., Lee, H., & Chen, Y. (2005). Personalized e-learning System Using Item
• Response Theory. Computers & Education, 44-3, 237-255. Cizek, G. J. (1999). Cheating On Tests: How To Do It, Detect It, And Prevent It. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphreys, L. G., Linn R. L. & Reckase M. D. (1984). Technical
• Guidelines for Assessing Computerized Adaptive Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21-4, 347-360. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. & Roger, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response
• Theory. Measurement Methods for the Social Sciences Series. Hakan, A., Sözer, E., Kaya, Z., Gültekin, M. ve Anıl, H. (1997), Açıköğretim Lisesi
• Kaya, Z. (1996). Uzaktan Eğitimde Ders Kitapları (Açıköğretim Lisesi Örneği) [Printed
• Materials in Distance Education: Case of Open Highschool], Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Baslı Atölyesi. Kaya, Z. (1998), “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin 75. Yılında Uzaktan Eğitim Uygulamalarımız
• [Distance Education Appilications in 75th Anniversarry of Turkish Republic]”, Milli Eğitim, Sayı 139. Kaya, Z. (2002), Uzaktan Eğitim, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Kaya, Z. (2005), Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Kaya, Z. ve Odabasi, F. (1996), “Türkiye’de Uzaktan Eğitimin Gelişimi [Development of
• Distance Education in Turkey]”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 1. Lord, F. M. (1980). Application of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems.
• Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum. Moore, M., Lockee, B. & Burton, J. (2002). Measuring Success: Evaluation Strategies for
• Distance Education. Educause Quarterly, 25-1, 20-26. Retrieved November 17, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/p/92835
• Neil C. Rowe. Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism. Retrieved December 13, 2013 http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer72/rowe72.html
• Olt, M. (2002). Ethics and Distance Education: Strategies for Minimizing Academic
• Dishonesty in Online Assessment. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5-3. [Online] Available from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/olt53.html Ravasco, G. G. (2012). Technology-Aided Cheating in Open and Distance e-Learning. The Asian Society of Open and Distance Education. 10-2, 71-77.
• Salcedo, P., Pinninghoff, M. A. & Contreras, R. (2005). Computerized Adaptive Tests and Item Response Theory on a Distance Education Platform, p: 613-621, Artificial
• Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering Applications: A Bioinspired Approach. Retrieved on November 17, 2013 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11499305_63#page-2
• Shachar, M. & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education
• Academic Performances: A meta-analytic approach. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4-2, Retrieved on November 17, 2013 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/234
• Tan, S. (2002) “Sınavlarda Kopya Çekmeyi Önlemeye Yönelik Önlemler [Prevents for cheating in exams].“ Eğitim ve Bilim, 26-122, 32-40.
• Weiss, D. J. (1983). New Horizons in Testing. New York: Academic Press. http://tutorials.txvsn.org/pluginfile.php/4627/mod_resource/content/1/cheatingdistance education.pdf (Retrieved on December 13, 2013).