An Analysis On Usage Preferences 
Of Learning Objects And Learning 
Object Repositories Among Pre-Service Teachers

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 161 - 174, 01.06.2014

Sabiha Yenı Nesrin Ozdener

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.46083

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to investigate how pre-service teachers benefit from learning objects repositories while preparing course content. Qualitative and quantitative data collection methods were used in a mixed methods approach. This study was carried out with 74 teachers from the Faculty of Education. In the first phase of the study, pre-service teachers’ prior knowledge about learning objects was defined. During the second phase of the study, a two-hour seminar was given to pre-service teachers to introduce the learning objects and the object repositories. Then, they were requested to prepare a course content and instructional plan using the object repositories. During the last phase of the study, their opinions about the object approach were determined. According to findings; before the seminar, it was observed that pre-services teachers didn’t know learning objects and object repositories. Also, they didn’t use learning object repositories as a reference for their courses. Pre-service teachers’ preferences about learning object repositories were change according to some different factors: especially language, interaction level and resource type. Furthermore, it was seen that most of them exhibited positive attitude toward learning objects. As a conclusion, it would be worthwhile to increase the number of object repositories allowing preparation of course contents by combining objects to form a whole, in order to promote and spread use of learning object approach among teachers and pre-service teachers through in-service training and pre-service training programs. Also, considering the factors affecting selection of learning objects, it would be an important step to provide support to creation of object repositories particularly in the native language, with high explanatory quality and exercise opportunities, for development and spread of use of learning objects and repositories.

Keywords

Web-based Learning, Learning Objects, Learning Object Repositories, Content Development.

References

• ACOL (Advisory Committee for Online Learning) (2001). Strategies for stimulating the on- line education system in Canada. Retrieved on February 12, 2009 from http://mlggam.ic.gc.ca/sites/acolccael/en/resources/R01_Anderson_Downes/rp_ 12.asp
• Cebeci, Z. (2003). Öğrenim Nesnesi Ambarlarına Giriş [Introduction to Learning Object
• Repositories]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (2), (1-6). Cakıroglu, U. & Baki, A. (2006). E-Öğrenme Ortamları için Tekrar Kullanılabilir Öğrenme
• Day, M. (2001), UK integrating Metadata Schema Registries with Digital Preservation
• Systems to Support Interoperability: a Proposal, Retrieved on January 23, 2009 from http://www.siderean.com/dc2003/101_paper38.pdf
• DLNET (2001), Brief Introduction to Learning Objects in DLNET, Retrieved on January13, 2009 from http://www.dlnet.vt.edu/working_docs/reports/ARI_LO_Def.pdf
• Duncan, C. (2003). The Value of Managing Learning Objects, An Intrallect White Paper, Intrallect Ltd.
• Ilomaki, L., Jaakkola, T., Lakka1a, M., Nirhamo, L., Nurmi, S., Paavola, S., Rahikainen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Principles, Models and Examples for Designing Learning Objects (LOs).
• Pedagogical Guidelines in CELEBRATE. A Working Paper for the European Commission, CELEBRATE Project, IST-2001-35188.
• Karaman, S. (2005). Developıng a Learnıng Object Based Content Development System and Determınıng the Object Based Content Design Profiles of Pre-Service Teachers. PhD
• Thesis, Atatürk University, Institute of Social Sciences, Erzurum, Turkey. Macromedia (2002), Creating Learning Objects for Your Organization, Learning Objects
• Development Center, Retrieved on July 05, 2012 from http://www.adobe.com/resources/elearning/whitepapers.html
• Millar, G. (2002). Learning Objects 101: A Primer for Neophytes, Learning Resources Unit,
• British Columbia Institute of Technology, Retrieved on January 8, 2009 from http://online.bcit.ca/sidebars/02november/inside-out-1.htm
• Mutlu, M. E. Dincer, G. Okur, M. R. , Sisman S. (2004). Öğrenim Sistemlerinin Tasarımında
• Kavram Haritaları, Öğrenme Nesneleri ve Eğitim Yönetim Sistemlerinin Rolü [The Role of Concept Maps, Learning Objects and Learning Management Systems in the Design of Learning Systems], Akademik Bilişim 04, Trabzon, Turkey. Porter D., Curry J., Muirhead B. & Galan N. (2002). A Report on Learning Object
• Repositories. Retrieved on February 04, 2009 from http://www.canarie.ca/funding/learning/lor.pdf
• Richards, G., McGreal, R., Hatala, M. & Friesen, N. (2003). The Evolution of Learning Object
• Repository Technologies: Portals for On-line Objects for Learning, Journal of Distance Education, Special Issue on Learning Object Repositories. Robson, R. (2000). “All About Learning Objects’. Eduworks Corporation. Retrieved on
• November 15, 2009 from http://www.eduworks.com/LOTT/tutorial/learningobjects.html
• Verduin, J. R, Clark, T. A. (1991). Distance Education: The Foundations of Effective
• Practice. California: Jossey - Bass Publisher. Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting Learning Objects to instructional Design Theory:
• Definition, a Metaphor, and a Taxonomy. In D. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved on January 12, 2009 from http://reusability.org/read
• Williams, D. D. (2000). Evaluation of Learning Objects and Instruction Using Learning
• Objects. In D. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects. Retrieved on January 12, 2009 from http://reusability.org/read