The Students' Experiences 
Of Ethics In Online Systems: A Phenomenological Study

Year 2014, Volume: 15 Issue: 4, 205 - 216, 01.12.2014

Leili Mosalanejad Ali Dehghanı Khadije Abdolahıfard

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.02251

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Cyber ethics is the philosophical study of ethics pertaining to computer networks encompassing users' behavior, what networked computers are programmed to do, and how this affects the individuals and the society. This study aimed to investigate the students' experiences of ethics in cyber systems.In the present study, the researchers conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews in a sample of students in JahromUniversity of Medical Sciences between November 2012 and February 2013. The interviews focused on the students' experiences of online ethics. Content analysis techniques were used to code and analyze the study data.The data were gathered from 25 interviews and 5 focused groups. The extracted codes were classified into two categories of positive and negativeimplications. The main themes of the study included ethicalimplications, cyber curiosity, limitation, virtual liberty, and development of ethics in the cyber system. Considering the importance ofethicsin thevirtual systems, it is necessary to train the studentsregardingthe optimalutilizationof thecyber space. Also, the students should be trained regarding the useof technology invarious scientific fields.

Keywords

Cyber Ethics, Students, Phenomenological Study.

Assistant professor Leili MOSALANEJAD

Abstract

References

• Amirkhani, A., Vahdat, D., & Khezrian, S. (2010). The connection between Internet ethic and character patern five of students. Ethics in Science and Technology, 5(3, 4), 57-66.
• Baum, J. (2005). The New Frontier. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 49(6), 54-56.
• Dealmeghani, M., & Hejazi, A. (2007). World Wide constructive influence on user behavior. Age of Information Technology.
• Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24, 105-112.
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
• Qualitative Health .Research 15, 1277-1288.
• JAMES H. M. (1985). "What Is Computer Ethics" in Metaphilosophy Computer and Ethics, 16(4), 266-275.
• Johnson, L. (2007). Face – interface or the prospect of a virtual ethics. The International
• Journal of Communication Ethics, 4(1,2), 49-55. Misfaden, L., & Partazian, K. (2007). Cyber culture, Dos and Don'ts in world network culture
• Mitcham, C. (2005). Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. Macmillan Reference
• USA, the University of Michigan. Morris, J. (2004). Programming doesn’t begin to define computer science. Tales of Technology.
• Poornaghdi, B. (2009). Ethics in Information Technology and the Ethics of
• Communication Pathology. Ethics in Science and Technology, 4(1,2), 21-28. Schmidt, C., & Boncella, R. (2006). A From work for an ethics course for the information technology student. Issues in Information Systems 7(1), 13-17.
• Shahriari, H. (2007). Tsunami OF Information. Rahavard noor journals 18.
• Shahriari, H. (2009). Computer Ethics, History and Overview. A Research Journal 1(4), 55
• Sohrabi, B., & Khanlari, A. (2009). Ethics, Information Technology and Organizational
• Citizenship Behavior. Ethics in Science & Technology 4(1, 2), 1-10. Szabo, A., & Underwood, J. (2004). Is information and communication technology fuelling academic dishonesty? Active Learning in Higher Education 5(2), 180-199.
• Thorseth, M. (2003). Applied ethics in internet research NTNU University Press, Trondheim. APPENDIX