Guided Assessment Or Open Discourse: 
A Comparative Analysis Of Students Interaction On Facebook Groups

Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 35 - 43, 01.03.2013

Lenandlar Sıngh

Abstract

Web 2.0 and specifically Social Networking Software have become ubiquitous tools for communication over the last five years. Across many disciplines, practitioners and researchers have been exploring these technologies with the hope of tapping into their perceived potential. Not least in this endeavor is the field of Education. Educators and Researchers have been engaged in active research on the practical and pedagogical benefits and implications of Web 2.0 and Social Networks. This paper explores the use of Facebook Groups in the Undergraduate Computer Science Program at the University of Guyana. Specifically, Guided Assessment strategies using Facebook Groups are compared with unguided and non-assessed Facebook Groups. Specifically, this study provides a comparative outline of the usage patterns of two (2) Instructor-Guided and Assessed Facebook Groups with three (3) student-led, non-assessed Facebook Groups that supported a form of Open Discourse. Results suggest that planned and guided, instructor-directed activities provide more focused responses from students compared to Open Discourse. However, information sharing and communication is common among both groups and in similar patterns. Particularly, students shared links, videos, and blogs with their colleagues. Planned activities are recommended for specific course objectives, while students should be encouraged to evaluate and share information among their peers.

Keywords

Facebook Groups, Web 2.0, Social Networks, Structured Learning, Higher Education.

References

• Al-Atabi, M., & Younis, O., (2010). Use of Facebook to support module delivery for undergraduate engineering programmes. Proceedings of the 2010 AaeE Conference,
• Sydney. Last accessed 11th July 2011. Available frmthe page of http://aaee.com.au/conferences/AAEE2010/PDF/AUTHOR/AE100155.PDF.
• Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education
• Media and Technology. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Last accessed 11th July 20 Available from the web page http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf .
• Collins, C. (2009). Web 2.0 Technology and Education. Issues and Trends in Educational
• Computing. Last accessed 11th July 2011Available from the page http://www.villanova.k12.nf.ca/ccollins/537/portifolio/web2.0.pdf
• Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45 (2), pp.93–106.
• De Villiers, M.R. (2010). Academic use of a group on Facebook: Initial findings and perceptions. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE). 2010. pp.173-190,School of Computing, University of South Africa.
• Ferdig, R. (2007). Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15 (1), 5-10.
• Gaffar, K., & Singh, L. (2011). Supporting Computer Science Education Using Web 2.0 and Social Software: Students’ and Lecturers’ Usage and Perception. Presented at the “Science, Technology and Sport: Bridging the Gap between Research and Practice”, 8-10
• June 2011, Kingston, Jamaica.
• Hartshorne, R. & Ajjan, H. (2008). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), pp.183-198.
• Lee, M. J. W., & Mc.Loughlin, C. (2010). Social software as tools for pedagogical transformation: Enabling personalization, creative production, and participatory learning.
• In N. Lambropoulos, & M. Romero (Eds.), Educational Social Software for Context-Aware Learning: Collaborative Methods and Human Interaction (pp. 1-22). Pennsylvania: Information Science. Maloney, E., 2007. What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning?. Chronicle of Higher Education. 25 (18), B26.
• O’Rawe, M. (2010). Can we be “friends”? Social networking and student engagement in an academic environment. Last accessed 11th July 2011,Available: http://www.shannoncollege.com/wpcontent/uploads/2009/12/THRIC-2010-Full-Paper- M.ORawe2.pdf.
• Selwyn, N. (2007). “Screw blackboard…do it on Facebook ”: An investigation of students’ educational use of Facebook.” Presented at the “Poke 1.0 – Facebook Social Research
• Symposium” , 15 November 2007, University of London.
• Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook.
• Learning, Media and Technology. 34 (2), pp.157-174. Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2011). Using social software to support computer science education: A case of using Facebook Groups. E-journal of the Caribbean Academy of
• Sciences (CAS), 5 (1), pp.1-12. Last accessed 11th July 2011. Available from http://ojs.mona.uwi.edu/index.php/cas/article/viewFile/2188/2260
• Visagie, S., & De Villiers, C. (2010). The consideration of Facebook as an academic tool by
• ICT lecturers across five countries. SACLA’10, June 2010, South Africa.