BibTex RIS Cite

Webfolio Application In Primary Education: 
Qualities And Usability Of Webfolio System

Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 104 - 119, 01.09.2013

Abstract

In today’s world, educational establishments should follow and utilize technological developments in order to improve the quality of educational activities. One of the fields that technology can be integrated into educational establishments is evaluation. There is a tendency of process evaluation in today’s evaluation field, and portfolios are among these process evaluation tools. In order to provide a faster and easier process, portfolios have been prepared in electronic settings and transformed into e-portfolios. Moreover, in time, e-portfolios had to be moved into web to improve their efficiency, and web-based-portfolio (Webfolio) emerged. The aim of this study is to identify the qualities of products, which came up as a part of webfolio application applied in primary education, and to determine the use of webfolios both by students and teachers. In this study, which aims to determine how effective webfolios are, one of the qualitative research designs, Natural Inquiry Approach was preferred. In this study, one of the purposeful sampling methods, criterion sampling was used was held in a private school connected to National Education Directorate of Eskisehir in 2008-2009 academic year spring term. Webfolios prepared by students, assignments given by the teacher, and other digital data available in webfolio system were used as data collection tools. When student webfolios were examined concerning their quality, most webfolios prepared by the students were found to be qualified enough in terms of readability, authenticity, timeliness, and the use of media sources. However, most of the student webfolios do not have a systematic design. The assignments given by the teacher was determined to be readable, clear, and has no misspelling. It was also observed that the teacher urged students to deliver their webfolios in time, suggested the use of class book and the Internet. Students, in their webfolios, preferred using text, picture and tables, but did not prefer to use video sources.

References

  • Aschermann, J. R. (1999). Electronic portfolios: Why? what? How?. J. Price et al. (Eds.)
  • In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 1790-1795).
  • Avraamidou, L. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2006). Exploring the influence of web-based portfolio development on learning to teach elementary science [Electronic version]. AACE Journal, 14(2), 178-205.
  • Campbell, M. I. & Moore, C. (2003). Web-based engineering portfolio system. In
  • American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings (p. 1520-1530).
  • Chang, C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceive deffects using Web-based portfolio assessment [Electronic version]. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1753-1771.
  • Driessen, E. W., Muijtjens, A. M. M., Van Tartwijk, J. & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Web or paper-based portfolios: Is there a difference? [Electronic version].
  • Medical Education, 41(11), 1067-1073.
  • Erlandson, A. E., Edwards, H. L., Skipper, B. L. & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing Naturalistic
  • Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Sage Publications. Gathercoal, P., Love, D. O., Bryde, B. R. & McKean, G. W. (2002). On implementing web-based electronic portfolios [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 25(2), 29-37.
  • Gathercoal, P., Bryde, B. R., Mahler, J., Love, D. O. & McKean, G. (2002). Preservice teacher standards and the magnetic connections electronic portfolio. The Annual
  • Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalist inquiry, ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252.
  • Hastie, P. A. & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2007). The use of web-based portfolios in college physical education activity courses [Electronic version]. Physical Educator, 64(1), 21-28.
  • Herner, L. M., Karayan, S., McKean, G. &Love, D. O. (2002). Special education teacher preparation and the electronic portfolio [Electronic version]. Journal of Special
  • Education Technology, 18(1), 44-49. Karayan, S. & Gathercoal, P. (2006). The webfolio: an innovative assessment technology for quality service-learning projects. American Association of Colleges for
  • Teacher Education, 58th Annual Meeting & Exhibits, San Diego, California. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/ p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/3/6/3/5/pages36355/p36355-1.php on 10/10/2009
  • Kendus, S. M. (2002). Developing a Web-based portfolyo [Electronic version]. Intercom, November, 4-7.
  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 104 - 119, 01.09.2013

Abstract

References

  • Aschermann, J. R. (1999). Electronic portfolios: Why? what? How?. J. Price et al. (Eds.)
  • In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 1790-1795).
  • Avraamidou, L. & Zembal-Saul, C. (2006). Exploring the influence of web-based portfolio development on learning to teach elementary science [Electronic version]. AACE Journal, 14(2), 178-205.
  • Campbell, M. I. & Moore, C. (2003). Web-based engineering portfolio system. In
  • American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings (p. 1520-1530).
  • Chang, C. (2008). Enhancing self-perceive deffects using Web-based portfolio assessment [Electronic version]. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1753-1771.
  • Driessen, E. W., Muijtjens, A. M. M., Van Tartwijk, J. & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Web or paper-based portfolios: Is there a difference? [Electronic version].
  • Medical Education, 41(11), 1067-1073.
  • Erlandson, A. E., Edwards, H. L., Skipper, B. L. & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing Naturalistic
  • Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Sage Publications. Gathercoal, P., Love, D. O., Bryde, B. R. & McKean, G. W. (2002). On implementing web-based electronic portfolios [Electronic version]. Educause Quarterly, 25(2), 29-37.
  • Gathercoal, P., Bryde, B. R., Mahler, J., Love, D. O. & McKean, G. (2002). Preservice teacher standards and the magnetic connections electronic portfolio. The Annual
  • Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalist inquiry, ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252.
  • Hastie, P. A. & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2007). The use of web-based portfolios in college physical education activity courses [Electronic version]. Physical Educator, 64(1), 21-28.
  • Herner, L. M., Karayan, S., McKean, G. &Love, D. O. (2002). Special education teacher preparation and the electronic portfolio [Electronic version]. Journal of Special
  • Education Technology, 18(1), 44-49. Karayan, S. & Gathercoal, P. (2006). The webfolio: an innovative assessment technology for quality service-learning projects. American Association of Colleges for
  • Teacher Education, 58th Annual Meeting & Exhibits, San Diego, California. Retrieved from http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/ p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/3/6/3/5/pages36355/p36355-1.php on 10/10/2009
  • Kendus, S. M. (2002). Developing a Web-based portfolyo [Electronic version]. Intercom, November, 4-7.
  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Sayım Aktay This is me

Mehmet Gultekın This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2013
Submission Date February 27, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2013 Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Aktay, S., & Gultekın, M. (2013). Webfolio Application In Primary Education: 
Qualities And Usability Of Webfolio System. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 104-119.