Promoting Socialization In Distance Education

Year 2012, Volume: 13 Issue: 1, 174 - 182, 01.03.2012

Shelia Y. Tucker

Abstract

Learners enjoy the convenience of being able to take online courses, yet many reports missing the face-to-face contact with their peers. This researcher has sought to tap into the vision of Ferratt & Hall (2009) whereby educators and technology designers are encouraged to extend the vision of online learning to “virtually being there and beyond.” Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine innovative synchronous technology and pedagogy as a means of promoting social presence in online learning. The inquiry was quantitative in nature. Through adapting Garrison and colleagues’ community of inquiry framework (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer 2000) it was noted that students perceived the use of synchronous Centra technology to be beneficial in promoting a sense of social presence in online learning. Through one-on-one conversations within Centra, it was discovered that the use of this technology also had a positive effect on student retention. There was a correlation between learners’ perception that the instructor promoted an atmosphere of online community and there being a sense of social presence. There was evidence of satisfaction with instructor as evidenced by high student evaluation ratings. Instructor ratings were above the department mean and the university mean.

Keywords

Social presence, Centra, online learning, emerging technology, The Concept of Social Presence in Distance Education

References

• Diaz, S., Swan, K., Ice, P., & Kupczynski, L., (2010). Student ratings of the importance of survey items, multiplicative factor analysis, and the validity of the community of inquiry survey. Internet and Higher Education (13), 22-30.
• Ferratt, T. W., and Hall, S. R., (2009). Extending the vision of distance education to learning via virtually being there and beyond. Communications of the Association for
• Information Systems 25(35) pp. 425-436. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-based
• Environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education (2-3), 87-105. Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T., (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Internet and Higher Education, 13, pp. 31-36.
• Irwin, C., & Berge, Z. (2006). Socialization in the online classroom. E-Journal of
• Instructional Science and Technology, 9(1), pp. 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ejist/docs/vol9_no1/papers/full_papers/irwin_berge.p df December 2, 2010.
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., Jochems, W., & Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers and Education, 49, pp. 176-192.
• Stodel, E., Thompson, T., Macdonald, C.. (2006). Learners' Perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol. 7
• (3). Retrieved online January 23, 2011, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325/744
• Swan, K., & Ice, P., (2010). The community of inquiry framework ten years later:
• Introduction to the special issue. Internet and Higher Education, 13, pp. 1-4. Watson, J. & Gemin, B. (2008). Promising practices in online learning: Socialization in
• Oline programs. North American Council for Online Learning. http://www.inacol.org/research/promisingpractices/NACOL_PP_Socialization.pdf Retrieved online December 8, 2010.