BibTex RIS Cite

Students’ Perceptions Of Change Readiness Of A Turkish Education Faculty Regarding Information And Communication Technologies

Year 2009, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 141 - 158, 01.03.2009

Abstract

A recent study investigated the degree of involvement in new teaching and learning methods by the academic staff of a large privileged Turkish state university, and revealed that faculties of education and open education were better in terms of change readiness than other faculties. The current study builds on that study, and investigates the involvement of the institution and teaching staff in technology integration from observers’ perspectives through administering a personal information form and a 31-item Likert questionnaire to 475 senior students of the Faculty of Education. Findings revealed that what were reported by instructors in the previous study seem somewhat different from what is being reported by their students in the current study. More specifically, students found their instructors and the infrastructure of the faculty quite inadequate in terms of the integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) within classroom settings. Implications and suggestions regarding the integration process are provided.

References

  • Akbulut, Y., Kesim, M., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007a). Construct validation of ICT indicators measurement scale (ICTIMS). The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(3), 60-77.
  • Akbulut, Y., Kuzu, A., Latchem, C., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007b). Change readiness among teaching staff at Anadolu University, Turkey. Distance Education, 28(3), 335-350.
  • Baek, Y., Jung, J, & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom?
  • Exploring the factors a.ecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50, 224–234. Barton, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Trainee teachers‘ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of
  • Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 257–272. Brill, J. M., & Galloway, C. (2007). Perils and promises: University instructors‘ integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 95
  • Bruce, B., & Levin, J. (2001). Roles for new technologies in language arts: inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. In J. Jenson, J. Flood, D. Lapp, & J. Squire
  • (Eds.), The handbook for research on teaching the language arts. NY: Macmillan. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal component analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series (vol. 69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.
  • Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49, 385–395.
  • Kadijevich, D., & Haapasalo, L. (2008). Factors that influence student teacher‘s interest to achieve educational technology standards. Computers & Education, 50, 262–270.
  • Latchem, C. (2008). Staff training and development matters. In 8th International Education
  • Technology Conference Proceedings (pp. 16-24). Ankara: Nobel Publications. Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers' barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 97-125.
  • Mehlinger, H. D., & Powers, S. M. (2002). Technology & teacher education: A guide for educators and policymakers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Müller, J., Gil, J. M. S., Hernandez, F., Giro, X., & Bosco, A. (2007). The socio-economic dimensions of ICT-driven educational change. Computers & Education, 49, 1175–1188.
  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
  • Sahin, I, & Thompson, A. (2007). Analysis of predictive factors that influence faculty members' technology adoption level. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15, 167
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83–94.
  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.
  • UNESCO (2002). Information and communication technologies in teacher education: A planning guide. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001295/129533e.pdf
Year 2009, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 141 - 158, 01.03.2009

Abstract

References

  • Akbulut, Y., Kesim, M., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007a). Construct validation of ICT indicators measurement scale (ICTIMS). The International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 3(3), 60-77.
  • Akbulut, Y., Kuzu, A., Latchem, C., & Odabasi, H. F. (2007b). Change readiness among teaching staff at Anadolu University, Turkey. Distance Education, 28(3), 335-350.
  • Baek, Y., Jung, J, & Kim, B. (2008). What makes teachers use technology in the classroom?
  • Exploring the factors a.ecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50, 224–234. Barton, R., & Haydn, T. (2006). Trainee teachers‘ views on what helps them to use information and communication technology effectively in their subject teaching. Journal of
  • Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 257–272. Brill, J. M., & Galloway, C. (2007). Perils and promises: University instructors‘ integration of technology in classroom-based practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 95
  • Bruce, B., & Levin, J. (2001). Roles for new technologies in language arts: inquiry, communication, construction, and expression. In J. Jenson, J. Flood, D. Lapp, & J. Squire
  • (Eds.), The handbook for research on teaching the language arts. NY: Macmillan. Dunteman, G. H. (1989). Principal component analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences series (vol. 69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd edition). London: Sage Publications.
  • Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49, 385–395.
  • Kadijevich, D., & Haapasalo, L. (2008). Factors that influence student teacher‘s interest to achieve educational technology standards. Computers & Education, 50, 262–270.
  • Latchem, C. (2008). Staff training and development matters. In 8th International Education
  • Technology Conference Proceedings (pp. 16-24). Ankara: Nobel Publications. Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers' barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 97-125.
  • Mehlinger, H. D., & Powers, S. M. (2002). Technology & teacher education: A guide for educators and policymakers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Müller, J., Gil, J. M. S., Hernandez, F., Giro, X., & Bosco, A. (2007). The socio-economic dimensions of ICT-driven educational change. Computers & Education, 49, 1175–1188.
  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
  • Sahin, I, & Thompson, A. (2007). Analysis of predictive factors that influence faculty members' technology adoption level. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15, 167
  • Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 83–94.
  • Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.
  • UNESCO (2002). Information and communication technologies in teacher education: A planning guide. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001295/129533e.pdf
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Yavuz Akbulut This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2009
Submission Date February 27, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Akbulut, Y. (2009). Students’ Perceptions Of Change Readiness Of A Turkish Education Faculty Regarding Information And Communication Technologies. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 141-158.