A Theoretical Framework
For Quality Indicators In Elearning

Year 2009, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 126 - 135, 01.12.2009

Ciprian Ceobanu Roxana Crıu Laura Asanduluı

Abstract

Advances in information and communication technologies, especially in Multimedia, Networking and Software Engineering allow the appearance of a new generation of computer-based training systems. Despite its obvious advantages in terms of reduced costs, simplified training programs and flexibility, e-learning was not always the miracle solution. Conceived as a powerful educational tool, e-learning was destined to change the face of learning but unfortunately, this change wasn’t exactly the intended one. The constant interest in researching and testing the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), eLearning and multimedia in the learning process led to educational imperatives about the indicators that can reveal the level of quality for teaching and management of the course. Modern eLearning solutions now recognize the importance of learning as a social process and offer possibilities for collaboration with other learners, for interaction with the learning content and for guidance from teachers, trainers and tutors. Our aim is to analyze the importance of using ICT in a “learning society”. The present paper focuses on the strong potential that ICT provides, in order to develop the learning possibilities among students. The great challenge is to draw up a quality indicators framework which can represent an instrument for teachers on how to organize their online course – including ways of developing the teaching methods.

Keywords

e-Learning Critique, e-Learning Indicators, e-Learning Quality

References

• Askar, P., et al, (2005). „Dimensions of Student Satisfaction on Online Programs‖ in Caroline Howard, Judith V. Boettcher, Lorraine Justice, Karen Schenk, Patricia L. Rogers Gary A. Berg (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Distance Learning , Idea Group Reference, Hershey, pp. 585-590.
• Barzilai, S., Zohar, A., (2007). „Is information acquisition still important in the information age?‖ in Education nd Information Technologies, vol. 13, no.1, Springer.
• Burrows, A., Harvey, L., Green, D. (1992). Is Anybody Listening? Employers' Views on Quality in Higher Education, Birmingham, QHE.
• Cartelli, A. (2005). „Between Tradition and Innovation in ICT and Teaching‖ in Caroline Howard, Judith V. Boettcher, Lorraine Justice, Karen Schenk, Patricia L. Rogers Gary A. Berg (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, pp.159-165.
• Idea Group Reference, Hershey, Ehlers, U. D., Goertz, L., Hildebrandt, B., Pawlowski, J. M. (2005). Quality in e-learning. Use and dissemination of quality approaches in European e-learning, European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, Belgium.
• Firdaus A. (2006). ―Measuring service quality in higher education: three instruments compared‖, in International Journal of Research & Method in Education, Vol. 29, No. 1.
• Fredriksson, U., Jedeskog, G., Plomp, T. (2008). Innovative use of ITC in schools based on the findings in ELFE project, in Education and Information Technologies, vol. 13, no.2, Springer.
• Harvey, L. and Mason, S. (1996). „A Quality Graduate‖ in Tait, J. and Knight, P., (Eds.) The Management of Independent Learning, London, Kogan Page/SEDA.
• Heather F. Steve K., Stephanie M. (Eds.) (2003). Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, Kogan Page.
• Kim W. (2006). ―Want to Know About Quality in Higher Education? Ask an Academic‖, in Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 12, No. 3.
• Kloos D.C., Pardo, A., (2004). EDUTECH-Computer-Aided Design Meets Computer-Aided Learning, Kluver Academic Publishers, Toulouse.
• Land, S. M., Greene, B. A. (2000). „Project-based learning with the World Wide Web: A qualitative study of resource Integration‖ in Educational Technology: Research and Development, 48 (1), 45-66.
• Naidu, S. (2005). „Researching Distance Education and E-learning‖ in P. Rogers (editor), The Encyclopedia of Distance Learning, Teaching, Technologies, and Applications.
• Romiszowski, A. (2004). „How‘s the E-learning Baby? Factors Leading to Success or Failure of an Educational Technology Innovation‖ in Educational Technology, 44(1) January-February, 5-27.
• Ruttenbur B. W., Spickler Ginger C. (2000). eLearning–The Engine of Knowledge Economy, Morgan Keegan & Co.
• Salomon, G. (2000). It's not just the tool, but the educational rationale that counts. Invited keynote at the 2000 ED-MEDIA Meeting. Accessed in august 2007 at http://www.aace.org/conf/edmedia/00/salomonkeynote.htm
• Woodill, G. (2004). Where is the Learning in E-learning?, Operitel Corporation.