Perspectives on Group Work In Distance Learning

Year 2007, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 105 - 113, 01.03.2007

Rune Sarromaa Hausstätter Yngve Troye Nordkvelle

Abstract

Current distance education benefits greatly from educational software that makes group work possible for students who are separated in time and space. However, some students prefer distance education because they can work on their own. This paper explores how students react to expectations on behalf of the course provider to do their assignments in collaborative groups. They are seemingly both positively surprised by the challenges that group work offer, and they are less positive to the downsides of group work. The paper discusses both sides of the experiences and suggests why this might be a paradox to live with.

Keywords

Group Work, Open and Distance Learning

References

• Dysthe, O. (2002): The Learning Potentials of a Web-mediated Discussion in a University Course. Studies in Higher Education. Vol. 28. no. 3 p. 339-352.
• Dysthe, O. (2001): Dialog, samspel og læring. (Dialogue, Interaction and Learning) Oslo: Abstrakt
• Johnson, W. D., Johnson, R. T., Haugalİkken, O., Aakervik, Aa. (1996) Samarbeid i skolen : pedagogisk utvikling - samspill mellom mennesker (Co-operation in schools: educational development- collaborative interplay between people.) Namsos : Pedagogisk psykologisk forlag
• Fritze, Y. & Bredvold, R. (1998) Fleksibilitet og læring. Rapport om videreutvikling av studiet ”omstilling og forhandlinger” (Flexibility and Learning. Report on the further Development of the course ”Re-organisation and Negoatiaition”. Lillehammer University College. Working Report nr. 78.
• Fritze, Y. & Nordkvelle, Y. (2000). Fra pedagogikk til elektronikk. (From Pedagogy to Electronic) In: J. Lesjİ (red.) Fra internat til internett. (From College with Student Accommodation to Inter-net) p. 90-104. Lillehammer University College 30 year Celebration.
• Hodgson, B. (1993). Key Terms and Issues in Open and Distance Learning. London, Kogan Page.
• Gunawardena, C. (2003). Researching Online Learning and Group Dynamics–Models and Methods. In Y. Fritze, G. Haugsbakk & Y. Nordkvelle (Eds.) Dialog og nærhet. Undervisning og IKT. (Dialogue and Closeness. Teaching and ICT) p. 94-108. Kristiansand: Hİgskoleforlaget
• Kaufman, D. (1989). Third generation course design in distance education. In R. Sweet (red.). Post-secondary Distance Education in Canada: Policies, Practices and Priorities. s. 61-78. Athabasca University. Canadian Society for Studies in Education.
• Klemm, W. R. (1998). Eight ways to get students more engaged in on-line conferences. http://resources.blackboard.com/scholar/general/pages/ictraining/Eight_Ways_Engage_Con
• ferences.pdf (12.07.06) Rattleff, P. (2001). Studiegruppers faglige diskussioner I computerkonferencer i et fjernstudium. (Student Groups Discussions in Computer Conferences in a distance Learning Program) Doctoral dissertation. Kİbenhavn: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitet.
• Schmuck. P. A. & Schmuck, R. A. (1983). Livet i klasserommet. (Life in the Classroom) Oslo: Cappelen.
• Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Tolmie, A. & Boyle, J. (2000). Factors influencing the success of computer mediated communication (CMC) environment in University teaching: a review and case study. Computers and Education, 34, 119-140.