A PARTICIPATORY PEDAGOGICAL MODEL FOR ONLINE DISTANCE LEARNING: IDEATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

Year 2023, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 145 - 161, 01.01.2023

Cecilia Gorıa Angelos Konstantınıdıs

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1082978

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In spite of its increasing popularity, distance education faces challenges – levels of digital literacy, access to technology, workload and time management, students’ feelings of isolation and disconnection – that can have a significant impact on the experience of the learners.
In addressing these issues, we propose a pedagogical model for distance learning which promotes the synergy of eight ingredients – Community, Openness, Multimodality, Participation, Personalisation, Learning, Experience, Technological-Enhancement, with their initial letters generating the acronym COMP-PLETE – for the shaping of a highly participatory online learning experience and the creation of an active and cohesive community characterised by a strong sense of commitment towards the learning of the individuals and that of the group.
This paper presents the theoretical rationale for and implementation of COMP-PLETE. It also provides recommendations for researchers and practitioners interested in cultivating an online learning community which responds well to the aforementioned challenges posed by distance education.

Keywords

pedagogical model, distance education, higher education, online learning, online community

References

• An, Y.-J., & Frick, T. (2006). Student Perceptions of Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in Face-to-Face Courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00023.x
• Andersen, R., & Ponti, M. (2014). Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: Challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35(2), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917703
• Armellini, A., & De Stefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework: Social presence and the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12302
• Attwell, G. (2007). Personal Learning Environments – the future of eLearning? ELearning Papers, 2(1), 1–8.
• Bichsel, J. (2013). The State of E-Learning in Higher Education: An Eye Toward Growth and Increased Access. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.1.3686.0644
• Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning Teaching and Assessment to Curriculum Objectives. Imaginative Curriculum Project, LTSN Generic Centre.
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728
• Carless, D. (2007). Learning‐oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081332
• Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5), Article 2.
• Cormier, D., & Siemens, G. (2010). Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement. EDUCAUSE Review, 45(4), 30–39.
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
• Dalsgaard, C., & Thestrup, K. (2015). Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i6.2146
• Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. In Emerging technologies for learning (Vol. 2, pp. 19–27). Becta.
• Gaebel, M., Kupriyanova, V., Morais, R., & Colucci, E. (2014). E-Learning in European Higher Education Institutions: Results of a Mapping Survey Conducted in October-December 2013. European University Association.
• Galley, R., Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2014). Community indicators: A framework for observing and supporting community activity on Cloudworks. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.680965
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
• Gee, J. P. (2012). Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203594216
• Gilakjani, A. P., Ismail, H. N., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The Effect of Multimodal Learning Models on Language Teaching and Learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1321-1327
• Girvan, C., Conneely, C., & Tangney, B. (2016). Extending experiential learning in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.009
• Goria, C. (2018, October). A COMP-PLETE experience for Distance Learning. International Conference on Distance Learning Education, Tokyo, Japan.
• Goria, C., & Hanford, S. (2019). Using Teams for a COMP-PLETE distance learning experience. ICERI 2019 Conference, Seville, Spain.
• Goria, C., & Konstantinidis, A. (2017, August). Implementing openness in a private online course: Theory, practice, and reflections. EUROCALL 2017 - CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions, Southampton, UK.
• Goria, C., Konstantinidis, A., Kilvinski, B., & Dogan, B. E. (2019). Personal learning environments and personal learning networks for language teachers’ professional development. In C. N. Giannikas, E. Kakoulli Constantinou, & S. Papadima-Sophocleous, Professional development in CALL: a selection of papers (pp. 87–99). Research-publishing.net. https://research-publishing.net/manuscript?10.14705/rpnet.2019.28.872
• Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.005
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
• Horspool, A., & Yang, S. S. (2010). A Comparison of University Student Perceptions and Success Learning Music Online and Face-to-face. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 15–29.
• Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and Digital Technologies in the Classroom. In I. de Saint-Georges & J.-J. Weber (Eds.), Multilingualism and Multimodality (pp. 141–152). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_8
• Johnson, M. W. (2016). The personal learning environment and the institution of education: Reflections on technological personalisation in iTEC schools. International Journal of Smart Technology and Learning, 1(1), 93. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMARTTL.2016.078164
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
• Konstantinidis, A. (2017). Using SmallWorlds to Enhance Social Presence, Group Cohesion, and Group Identity in an Online Postgraduate Course. In G. Panconesi & M. Guida (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Collaborative Teaching Practice in Virtual Learning Environments: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2426-7
• Konstantinidis, A., & Goria, C. (2016). Cultivating a community of learners in a distance learning postgraduate course for language professionals. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 230–236). Research-publishing.net. https://research-publishing.net/display_article.php?doi=10.14705/rpnet.2016.eurocall2016.567
• Kravcik, M., & Klamma, R. (2012). Supporting Self-Regulation by Personal Learning Environments. 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 710–711. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2012.192
• Kress, G. (2012). What is multimodality? (B. Hendriksen, Interviewer) [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt5wPIhhDDU
• Laakkonen, I. (2011). Personal learning environments in higher education language courses: An informal and learner-centred approach. In S. Thouësny & L. Bradley (Eds.), Second Language Teaching and Learning with Technology: Views of Emergent Researchers (pp. 9–28). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2011.000004
• LaPointe, L., & Reisetter, M. (2008). Belonging Online: Students’ Perceptions of the Value and Efficacy of an Online Learning Community. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(4), 641–665.
• Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. 2012. £22.99 (pbk). ISBN-10: 041580387X. London: Routledge.
• Laurillard, D. (2016). Introduction to the six learning types [Video]. https://mediacentral.ucl.ac.uk/Play/4358 McCarthy, M. (2016). Experiential Learning Theory: From Theory To Practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 14(3), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v14i3.9749
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2007, 664–675. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/46128/
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). The Three P’s of Pedagogy for the Networked Society: Personalization, Participation, and Productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27.
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments: Special Issue on Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
• Paskevicius, M., Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2018). Content is King: An Analysis of How the Twitter Discourse Surrounding Open Education Unfolded From 2009 to 2016. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3267
• Price, K. (2013, November 7). Multimodal interfaces: Blending gaze, gesture, movement and speech to overcome the limitations of keyboard, mouse & touchscreen. WordCALL, Glasgow.
• Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, Technology, and Education. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/puentedura_tte.pdf
• Sankey, M., Birch, D., & Gardiner, M. (2010). Engaging students through multimodal learning environments: The journey continues. In C. H. Steel, M. J. Keppell, P. Gerbic, & S. Housego (Eds.), Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 852–863).
• Schwartzman, R. (2007). Refining the Question: How Can Online Instruction Maximize Opportunities for All Students? Communication Education, 56(1), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009728
• Siemens, G. (2008). New structures and spaces of learning: The systemic impact of connective knowledge, connectivism, and networked learning. http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/systemic_impact.htm
• Toohey, S. (1999). Beliefs, values and ideologies in course design. In Designing courses for higher education (pp. 44–69). Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
• Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
• Weller, M. (2012). The openness-creativity cycle in education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-02