Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE

Year 2025, Volume: 26 Issue: 4, 222 - 239, 01.10.2025
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1609742

Abstract

Over the past decades, language teachers have utilized the advantages of technology in the language classroom, yet given the explosion of technological tools and applications in recent years, there is no consensus as to which technological advancement best serves the development of which language skills or components. The current investigation was designed to examine the potential impacts of digital multimodal composing (DMC) and massive online open courses (MOOC) on the speaking fluency and coherence of Iranian intermediate IELTS candidates. To this end, a pretest-treatment-posttest, quasi-experimental design was utilized and a sample of 93 male/female EFL learners at the intermediate level were selected based on volunteer sampling procedures. Subsequently, the participants were assigned to the three groups of DMC, MOOC, and control group (CG). The three groups were exposed to the same instructional materials, with the difference being that in DMC, the learners had to produce videos during the course and post them on the Flip platform for their peers and teacher to review and comment. They then could use the feedback to make corrections/revisions; in the MOOC condition, the learners signed up for the course on futurelearn. com and received video presentations, pdf articles, and quizzes, and they were made to leave comments or react to each other’s’ comments during the course. In the CG, the materials were presented in print and through powerpoint slides by the teacher. Comparisons of the speaking posttest scores of the learners in the three groups revealed that with regard to fluency and coherence, DMC learners significantly outperformed MOOC learners, who were in turn better than the CG learners. Based on these findings, this study presents a discussion of certain pedagogical implications.

References

  • Alanazi, H., & Walker-Gleaves, C. (2019). Investigating student attitudes towards using Hybrid MOOCs in the higher education of Saudi Arabia. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 10(1), 3140- 3146.
  • Albino, G. (2017). Improving speaking fluency in a task-based language teaching approach: The case of EFL learners at PUNIV-Cazenga. Sage Open, DOI: 10.1177/2158244017691077
  • Alharbi, H. (2015). Improving students’ English speaking proficiency in Saudi public schools. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.818a
  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), Retrieved 2 March, 2021, from, http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/890/1663
  • Chacon-Beltran, R. (2017). The role of MOOCs in the learning of languages: Lessons from a beginners’ English course. Porta Linguarum, 28, 23-35.
There are 5 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Curriculum and Instration (Other)
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fahimeh Talakoob This is me 0009-0009-0088-4014

Hossein Heidari Tabrizi 0000-0002-9360-1555

Sajad Shafiee This is me 0000-0003-3501-1757

Publication Date October 1, 2025
Submission Date December 30, 2024
Acceptance Date April 7, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 26 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Talakoob, F., Tabrizi, H. H., & Shafiee, S. (2025). DIGITAL MULTIMODAL COMPOSING VS. MOOC-BASED INSTRUCTION: EFFECTS ON IELTS CANDIDATES’ SPEAKING FLUENCY AND COHERENCE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(4), 222-239. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1609742