Electronic Mentorship with Mentee Perception

Year 2015, Volume: 6 Issue: 3, 45 - 66, 31.07.2015

Tuncay Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.82140

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Mentorship applications are commonly implemented in many European countries and America. Parallel with the developments in technology, e-mentorship programs, along with conventional and face-to-face mentorship, have become widespread. In this study we tried to determine the provincial education supervisors’ and their assistant supervisors’ perceptions on their roles over mentorship/e-mentorship. With this respect, interview forms carrying the aims of the study were developed by revising the interview forms Cantimer (2008) and Clouse (2007) used. Participants stated that provincial education supervisors and their assistant supervisors had occupational assistance and guidance, inspection and investigation, leadership, counseling and researching roles in accordance with their mentorship/e-mentorship roles.

Keywords: Mentorship, E-Mentorship, Educational Inspection, Provincial Education Supervisor

Öz

Mentorluk uygulamaları birçok Avrupa ülkesi ve Amerika’da yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle teknolojik alanda yaşanan gelişmelere paralel olarak geleneksel ya da yüz-yüze mentorluk programlarının yanı sıra e-mentorluk programları da yaygınlaşmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mentorluk/e-mentorluk rolleri üzerine algıları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla Cantimer (2008)’in ve Clouse (2007)’nin kullandıkları görüşme formları araştırmanın amaçları doğrultusunda araştırmacılar tarafından revize edilerek geliştirilen görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mentorluk/e-mentorluk rollerine ilişkin mesleki yardım ve rehberlik, inceleme ve soruşturma, liderlik, danışmanlık ve araştırmacılık rollerinin olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: Mentorluk, E-mentorluk, Eğitim Denetimi, İl eğitim Denetmeni

Keywords

Mentorship, E-Mentorship, Educational Inspection, Provincial Education Supervisor

Electronic Mentorship with Mentee Perception

Abstract

Mentorluk uygulamaları birçok Avrupa ülkesi ve Amerika’da yaygın bir şekilde kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle teknolojik alanda yaşanan gelişmelere paralel olarak geleneksel ya da yüz-yüze mentorluk programlarının yanı sıra e-mentorluk programları da yaygınlaşmaya başlamıştır. Bu çalışmada il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mentorluk/e-mentorluk rolleri üzerine algıları belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla Cantimer (2008)’in ve Clouse (2007)’nin kullandıkları görüşme formları araştırmanın amaçları doğrultusunda araştırmacılar tarafından revize edilerek geliştirilen görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Katılımcılar il eğitim denetmen ve yardımcılarının mentorluk/e-mentorluk rollerine ilişkin mesleki yardım ve rehberlik, inceleme ve soruşturma, liderlik, danışmanlık ve araştırmacılık rollerinin olduğunu ifade etmişlerdir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: Mentorluk, E-mentorluk, Eğitim Denetimi, İl eğitim Denetmeni

Abstract

Mentorship applications are commonly implemented in many European countries and America. Parallel with the developments in technology, e-mentorship programs, along with conventional and face-to-face mentorship, have become widespread. In this study we tried to determine the provincial education supervisors’ and their assistant supervisors’ perceptions on their roles over mentorship/e-mentorship. With this respect, interview forms carrying the aims of the study were developed by revising the interview forms Cantimer (2008) and Clouse (2007) used. Participants stated that provincial education supervisors and their assistant supervisors had occupational assistance and guidance, inspection and investigation, leadership, counseling and researching roles in accordance with their mentorship/e-mentorship roles.

Keywords: Mentorship, E-Mentorship, Educational Inspection, Provincial Education Supervisor

Keywords

-

References

• Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2008). Mentor matching: A ''Goodness of Fit'' model, Administration & Society, 40(5), 465-482.
• Cantimer, G. (2008). İlköğretim okul yöneticileri ve ilköğretim müfettişlerinin mentorluk rollerine ilişkin görüşleri (Sakarya ili örneği) (Unpublished master thesis). Sakarya Social Sciences Institute, Sakarya, Turkey.
• Clouse, N., K., G. (2007). The leadership role in online support programs for beginning teachers (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Montana, Department of Educational Leadership, USA.
• Clutterbuck, D. (1991). Everyone needs a mentor – Fostering talent in your organization (4th ed.). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel & Development.
• Culnan, M. J., & Markus, M. L. (1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.). Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (ss. 420–443). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Echavarria, T., Mitchell, W.B., Newsome, k.l., Peters, T.A. & Wentz, D. (1995). Encouraging research through electronic mentoring: A case study, College & Research Libraries, 56, 352–361.
• Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 264–288.
• Harris, J., Rotenberg, L. & O’Bryan, E. (1997) Results from the Electronic Emissary Project: Telementoring lessons and examples. Denton, TX: Texas Center for Educational Technology. Retrieved from http://www.tcet.unt.edu/pubs/em/em01.pdf.
• Hezlett S. A., & Gibson S. (2005) Mentoring and human resource development: where we are and where we need to go. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 446–469.
• Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625.
• Lewis, C. W. (2002). International Telementor Program (ITP) report: Evaluation results from teacher surveys: May 2000–March 2002 (Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University). Retrieved from http://www.telementor.org.
• Lipscomb, R. (2010). Instant mentoring: Sharing wisdom and getting advice online with e-mentoring, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 113(5 Suppl), 32-37.
• Miller, A. (2002). Best practices in formal youth mentoring. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of mentoring (pp. 307–324). Oxford: Blackwell.
• Miller, K.L. & Mcdaniels, R.M. (2001). Cyberspace, the new frontier, Journal of Career Development, 27, 199–206.
• Murray, M. (1991). Beyond the myths and magic of mentoring: How to facilitate an effective mentoring program. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• O’Neill, D. K., Wagner, R. & Gomez, L. M. (1996) Online mentors: Experimenting in science class, Educational Leadership, 54(3), 39–42.
• Packard, B. W. (2003) Web-based mentoring: Challenging traditional models to increase women’s access, Mentoring and Tutoring, 11(1), 53–65.
• Parsloe, E., & Leedham, M. (2009). Coaching and mentoring: Practical conversations to improve learning (2nd ed.) Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page.
• Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177-1194.
• Rhodes, J. E., (2004). A model of youth mentoring. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 30–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Russell, A. & Perris, K. (2003) Telementoring in community nursing: a shift from dyadic to communal modes of learning and professional development, Mentoring and Tutoring, 1(3), 227–237.
• Sandars J., (2006). Collaborative knowledge sharing: An e-learning approach. E-learning for GP educators, Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
• Sanders, M. (2009). The Power of mentoring: Shaping people who will shape the world. Camp Hill, PA: Wingspread Publishers.
• Shea, G. F. (1992). Mentoring: A guide to the basics. London: Kogan Page.
• Single, P. B., Muller, C. B. & Carlsen, W. S. (2000, April). Electronic mentoring: testing the features of a structured program. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Abstract retrieved from: www.uvm.edu/∼pbsingle.
• Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace. Melbourne: Spin Fex Press.
• Sproull, L., & Keisler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 17, 1492–1512.
• Stevens, D.T. & Lundberg, D. J. (1998). The emergence of the Internet: enhancing career counseling education and services, Journal of Career Development, 24, 195–208.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative methods in social sciences, (6th ed). Ankara: Seçkin.