Economic Return versus Crop Water Productivity of Watermelon under Full and Deficit Irrigation Conditions

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 7 - 14, 15.03.2017

Hayrettin Kuşçu Ahmet Turhan Hakan Büyükcangaz Bilge Keskin Ezgi Kurtulmuş Ali Osman Demir

https://doi.org/10.21657/topraksu.305697

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Field research was carried out in a sub humid climate at the Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. Using the

yield data obtained from the field research for 2011 and 2012, a partial economic analysis was conducted

for watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris, var. Crimson Sweet) at four drip irrigation treatments of full irrigation [FI,

100% evapotranspiration (ETc)] and deficit irrigation (DI) [75% FI, 50% FI and 25% FI] and then compared

to both physical and economic water use efficiency (WUE). Total costs and net incomes differed among

irrigation strategies. Marketable yield (MY) and net income to land decreased with decreases in the amount

of irrigation. The highest MY and net income to land were obtained with the full irrigation treatment. The

results showed that full irrigation is recommended under non-water-limiting environments for higher

yield and net income. The highest net income to water, physical WUE and economic WUE values were

resulted from the 75% FI. With consideration to net income and water use efficiency, deficit irrigation

management strategy of 75% FI under water-limiting conditions can be preferable, because it achieved

irrigation water savings of 25%, an increase of 9% in crop water use efficiency and an acceptable net

income with a yield loss of only approximately 8% compared with full irrigation.

Keywords

Citrullus vulgaris, limited irrigation, economic analysis, evapotranspiration

References

• Ali M.H., Hoque M.R., Hassan A.A., Khair A. 2007. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield, water productivity, and economic returns of wheat. Agricultural Water Management, 92 (3): 151–161.
• de Andrade A.S., Frizzone J.A., Bastos E.A., Cardoso M.J., Rodrigues B.H.N. 2001. Optimal irrigation strategies for watermelon crop. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 36 (2): 301–305.
• EE. 2016. Enerji Enstitüsü. Available: http://enerjienstitusu.com/elektrik-fiyatlari/
• English M. 1990. Deficit Irrigation. I: Analytical Framework. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 116 (3): 399–412.
• Erdem Y., Yuksel A.N. 2003. Yield response of watermelon to irrigation shortage. Scientia Horticulturae, 98 (4): 365–383.
• Erdem Y., Erdem T., Orta A.H., Okursoy H. 2005. Irrigation scheduling for watermelon with crop water stress index (CWSI). Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(4): 449–460.
• Feddema J.J. 2005. A revised Thornthwaite-type global climate classification. Physical Geography. 26:442–466.
• Garrity P.D., Watts D.G., Sullivan C.Y., Gilley J.R. 1982. Moisture deficits and grain sorghum performance, evapotranspiration yield relationships. Agronomy Journal, 74, 815–820.
• Karasu A., Kuşçu H., Öz M. 2015. Yield and economic return response of silage maize to different levels of irrigation water in a sub-humid zone. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 102(3): 313–318.
• Kirnak H., Dogan E. 2009. Effect of seasonal water stress imposed on drip irrigated second crop watermelon grown in semi-arid climatic conditions. Irrigation Science, 27: 155–164.
• Kuşçu H., Turhan A., Demir A.O. 2014. The response of processing tomato to deficit irrigation at various phenological stages in a sub-humid environment. Agricultural Water Management, 133: 92–103.
• Kuşçu H., Turhan A., Ozmen N., Aydınol P., Buyukcangaz H., Demir A.O. 2015. Deficit irrigation effects on watermelon (Citrullus Vulgaris) in a sub humid environment. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 25 (6):1652–1659.
• Leskovar D.I., Bang H., Kolenda K., Franco J.A., Perkins-Veazie P. 2003. Deficit irrigation influences yield and lycopene content of diploid and triploid watermelon. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 628: 147–151.
• Lu W., Duthie J.A., Roberts B.W., Taylor M.J., Edelson J.V. 2003. Partial budget analysis of effects of crop management intensity on profitability of three watermelon cultivars. Journal of Vegetable Crop Production, 9 (1): 49–71.
• Luquet D., Vidal A., Smith M., Dauzat J. 2005. ‘More crop per drop’: how to make it acceptable for farmers? Agricultural Water Management, 76 (2): 108–119.
• Moradi R., Moghaddam P.R., Mansoori H. 2015. Energy use and economical analysis of seedy watermelon production for different irrigation systems in Iran. Energy Reports, 1: 36–42.
• Namdari M. 2011. Energy use and cost analysis of watermelon production under different technologies in Iran. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1 (6): 1144–1153.
• Pejić B., Mačkić K., Pavković S., Ljevnaić-Mašić B., Aksić M., Gvozdanović-Varga J. 2016. Water-yield relations of drip irrigated watermelon in temperate climatic conditions. Contemporary Agriculture, 65 (1 – 2):53–59.
• Qadir M., Bores T.M, Schubert S., Ghafoor A., Murtaza G. 2003. Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: challenges and opportunities. Agricultural Water Management, 62:165–185.
• Rouphael Y., Carderelli M., Colla G. 2008. Yield, mineral composition, water relations, and water use efficiency of grafted mini-watermelon plants under deficit irrigation. HortScience, 43 (3): 730–736.
• Şimşek M., Kacira M., Tonkaz T. 2004. The effects of different drip irrigation regimes on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-arid climatic conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 55 (11): 1149–1157.
• Tingwu L., Juan X., Guangyong L., Jianhua M., Jianping W., Zhizhong L., Jianguo Z. 2003. Effect of drip irrigation with saline water on water use efficiency and quality of watermelons. Water Resources Management, 17 (6): 395–408.
• Wang Y., Xie Z.K., Li .F, Zhang Z. 2004. The effect of supplemental irrigation on watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) production in gravel and sand mulched fields in the Loess Plateau of northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 69 (1): 29–41.
• Yıldırım O., Halloran N., Çavuşoğlu Ş., Şengül N. 2009. Effects of different irrigation programs on the growth, yield, and fruit quality of drip-irrigated melon. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, 33 (3): 243–255.
• Yıldırım O. 2013. Sulama Sistemlerinin Tasarımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:1594, Ankara, p. 367. Zhang J., Yang J. 2004. Improving harvest index is an effective way to increase crop water use efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, on the theme Crop Science for Diversified Planet, pp. 1–7, 21–25 September, Brisbane, Australia.