Development of Marital Happiness Scale

Year 2026, Volume: 16 Issue: 80, 74 - 87, 27.03.2026

Cemile Dur Öztürk , İbrahim Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1653019

https://izlik.org/JA53LJ72HN

Abstract

This study presents the Marital Happiness Scale (MHS), a tool designed to assess the degree of happiness associated with various aspects of marriage among married individuals. The validity of the MHS was tested using three methods: exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and criterion validity testing. EFA was conducted on data from 420 married individuals, CFA on data from 221 participants, and criterion validity was examined using data from 272 individuals. EFA results indicated that the MHS comprises two factors, namely Emotional Intimacy and Marital Commitment, which together explained 70% of the total variance. CFA confirmed the construct validity of the two-factor model. The criterion validity of the MHS was assessed by examining the correlation coefficients between the MHS and the Spouse Support Scale (SSS) and the Couple Burnout Scale-Short Version (CBMS). The MHS demonstrated a significant and positive correlation with the SSS at a high level and a significant but negative correlation with the CBMS at a moderate level. The reliability of the MHS was tested using three methods: Cronbach's alpha (α), McDonald's omega (ω), and test-retest reliability coefficients. For the MHS, Cronbach's α and McDonald’s ω were both .97, and the test–retest reliability coefficient was r = .85. The results indicate that the MHS is a valid, reliable, and useful instrument for measuring happiness in married individuals.

Keywords

marital happiness , emotional intimacy , marital commitment , married individuals , scale development

References

• Adams, J. M., & Jones, W. H. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177
• Akçabozan Kayabol, N. B., Çağ, P., Akbaş, U., Hatipoğlu Sümer, Z., Özbay, Y., Aydın, G., Karacan Özdemir, N., Tatlı, C., & Eker Durmuş, E. (2023). Evlilik Doyumu Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 13(1), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1198940
• Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096345
• Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020184
• Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions and goodness of fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
• Birditt, K. S., Hope, S., Brown, E., & Orbuch, T. (2012). Developmental trajectories of marital happiness over 16 years. Research in Human Development, 9(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2012.680844
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2017). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. PegemA Akademi.
• Carasso, E., & Segel‐Karpas, D. (2024). Marital strain and emotional intimacy in midlife couples: The moderating role of empathy. Personal Relationships, 31(3), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12559
• Celenk, O., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Perceived antecedents of marital satisfaction among Turkish, Turkish-Dutch, and Dutch couples. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.741242
• Civan, A. (2011). Eşlerin duygu dışavurum tarzları ile algılanan evlilik kalitesinin ilişkisi ve duygusal farkındalığın rolü. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Mersin Üniversitesi.
• Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(4), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584
• Cordova, J. V., Gee, C. B., & Warren, L. Z. (2005). Emotional skillfulness in marriage: Intimacy as a mediator of the relationship between emotional skillfulness and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(2), 218–235. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.2.218.62270
• Corra, M., Carter, S. K., Carter, J. S., & Knox, D. (2009). Trends in marital happiness by gender and race, 1973 to 2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30(10), 1379-1404. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0192513X09336214
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
• Coyne, J. C., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Going beyond social support: The role of social relationships in adaptation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(4), 454-460. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.54.4.454
• Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support as a determinant of marital quality: The interplay of negative and supportive behaviors. In G. R. Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 173-194). Plenum Press.
• Çağ, P. (2016). Evlilik doyumu: Bir model testi. [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Çağ, P., & Yıldırım, İ. (2013). Evlilik doyumunu yordayan ilişkisel ve kişisel değişkenler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(39), 13-23.
• Çapri, B. (2013). Tükenmişlik Ölçeği-Kısa Formu ile Eş Tükenmişlik Ölçeği-Kısa Formu’nun Türkçe uyarlaması ve psikoanalitik-varoluşçu bakış açısından mesleki ve eş tükenmişlik ilişkisi. Educational Sciences Theory & Practice, 13(3), 1393-1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.3.1576
• Çelik, D. M., & İnanç, P. D. B. Y. (2009). Evlilik Doyum Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2), 247-269.
• Demiral, S. (2020). Evlilik çatışması ve çatışma çözüm stillerinin mutluluk düzeyleri açısından incelenmesi. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 6(27), 864-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.300
• Dilmaç, B., Karababa, A., Seki, T., Şimşir, Z., & Kurnaz, M. F. (2023). Examining the relationships between fear of coronavirus, state anxiety, and relationship happiness among married Turkish individuals during COVID-19. Journal of Family Issues, 44(4), 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211055513
• Erbek, E., Beştepe, E., Akar, H., Eradamlar, N., & Alpkan, E. L (2005). Evlilik uyumu. Düşünen Adam, 18(1), 39- 47.
• Eskin, M. (2012). Evlilik terapisi için başvuran çiftlerin evlilik doyumu ve evlilik terapisiyle hakkındaki görüşleriyle ilişkili etmenler. Klinik Psikiyatri,15(1), 226-237.
• Fışıloğlu, H., & Demir, A. (2000). Applicability of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for measurement of marital quality with Turkish couples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 214–218. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.16.3.214
• Fincham, F. D. (1998). Child development and marital relations. Child Development, 69(2), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132183
• Fincham, F. D. ve Rogge, R. (2010). Understanding relationship quality: Theoretical challenges and new tools for assessment. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 2(4), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00059.x
• Fletcher, G. J., Fitness, J., & Blampied, N. M. (1990). The link between attributions and happiness in close relationships: The roles of depression and explanatory style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.2.243
• Givertz, M., Segrin, C., & Woszidlo, A. (2016). Direct and indirect effects of commitment on interdependence and satisfaction in married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000174
• Givertz, M., Woszidlo, A., Segrin, C., & Knutson, K. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of attachment orientation on relationship quality and loneliness in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1096–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513482445
• Gladding, S. T. (2020). Aile terapisi tarihi, kuram ve uygulamaları. İ. Keklik, & İ. Yıldırım (Çev. Ed.). Türk PDR Derneği Yayınları.
• Glenn, N.D. (1998). The course of marital success and failure in five American 10 year marriage cohorts. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 569-576. https://doi.org/10.2307/353529
• Gottman, J., & Silver, N. (2019). Evliliği sürdürmenin yedi ilkesi. E. Deniz (Çev.). Varlık Yayınları.
• Gürbüz, S. (2024). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Gürel, B. (2016). Ekonomik faktörlerin evlilik kalitesine etkisi: Bir dyadic model testi. [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Gürel, B., & Çopur, Z. (2020). Evlilik Kalitesi Ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 30-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.33537/sobild.2020.11.2.4
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
• Hooper, D. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. In H. Chen (Ed.), Approaches to quantitative research: Theory and its practical application: A guide for dissertation students (pp. 1–33). Oak Tree Press.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Huang, C.‐Y., Shen, A. C.‐T., Li, X., & Feng, J. Y. (2024). Happy parents, happy kids: Marital happiness, parenting styles, and children's behavioral outcomes in Chinese societies. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 73(3), 1763–1780. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12997
• İmamoğlu, E. O. (1998). Individualism and collectivism in a model and scale of balanced differentiation and integration. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 132(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599268
• Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., Edwards, J. N., & Booth, A. (1986). Dimensions of marital quality: Toward methodological and conceptual refinement. Journal of Family Issues, 7(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251386007001003
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2022). Benlik, aile ve insan gelişimi: Kültürel psikolojide kuram ve uygulamalar. Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Kamp-Dush, C. M., Taylor, M. G., & Kroeger, R. A. (2008). Marital happiness and psychological well-being across the life course. Family Relations, 57, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00495.x
• Keskin, F., & Nacar, G. (2023). The predictors of sexual quality of life and relationship happiness during the COVID-19 pandemic: a sample of Turkey. Women & Health, 63(9), 684–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2023.2262606
• Kılıçarslan, S., & Şahan, B. (2021). Divorce in Turkish Society: Personal and family of origin characteristics. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal (2), 1003–1032.
• Kline, R. B. (2019). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesinin ilkeleri ve uygulaması. S. Şen (Çev. Ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Koyuncu, A. B. (2023). Evli bireylerde öznel mutluluk ve ilişkisel mutluluğun evlilik doyumuna etkisi. Aile Dergisi, 1(1), 84-100. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10561135
• Lawrence, E. M., Rogers, R. G., Zajacova, A., & Wadsworth, T. (2019). Marital happiness, marital status, health, and longevity. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 20(5), 1539–1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-0009-9
• Park, Y., & Park, S. W. (2018). Partner commitment moderates the association between commitment and interest in romantic alternatives. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1439–1447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0079-1
• Proulx, C. M., & Snyder-Rivas, L. A. (2013). The longitudinal associations between marital happiness, problems, and self-rated health. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031877
• Rauer, A., & Volling, B. (2013). More than one way to be happy: A typology of marital happiness. Family Process, 52(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12028
• Schoebi, D., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2012). Stability and change in the first 10 years of marriage: Does commitment confer benefits beyond the effects of satisfaction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026290
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
• Sinclair, V. G., & Dowdy, S. W. (2005). Development and validation of the Emotional Intimacy Scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 13(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.13.3.193
• Spanier, G. B. (1979). The measurement of marital quality. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 5(3), 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926237908403734
• Spanier, G.B., Lewis, R.A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 42, s.825-839
• Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119
• Stets, J. E., & Hammons, S. A. (2002). Gender, control, and marital commitment. Journal of Family Issues, 23(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02023001001
• Tezer, E. (1996). Evlilik ilişkisinden sağlanan doyum: Evlilik Yaşamı Ölçeği. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(7), 1–7.
• Topkaya, N., Şahin, E., Terzioğulları Yılmaz, C., & Aşantuğrul, N. (2024). Predictors of couple burnout among Turkish married individuals. Behavioral Sciences, 14(7), 561. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14070561
• Tutarel- Kışlak, Ş. (2002). İlişkilerde Mutluluk Ölçeği (İMÖ): Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kriz Dergisi, 10(1), 37-43.
• Waite, L. J., Luo, Y., & Lewin, A. C. (2009). Marital happiness and marital stability: Consequences for psychological well-being. Social Science Research 38, 201–212.
• Yıldırım, İ. (2004). Eş Destek Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(22), 19-25.
• Yıldız-Önal, Y., & Uçar, S. (2023). Relationship beliefs and communication skills in Turkish married individuals: Examining the mediating role of partner accommodation behavior and emotional dependency. Journal of Family Issues, 44(7), 1716-1732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211064868
• Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072
• Zhang, Z., & Hayward, M. (2006). Gender, the marital life course, and cardiovascular disease in late midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 639-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00280.x