Emerging Adulthood in Türkiye: Psychometric Evaluation of the IDEA-TR and Demographic Differences among Turkish Emerging Adults

Abstract

This study aims to update the psychometric properties of the IDEA-TR Scale, which is used to assess dimensions of emerging adulthood, and to investigate differences in IDEA dimensions based on demographic variables. Study 1 (n = 735) examined the psychometric properties of the IDEA-TR to test its validity and reliability within the Turkish context. In Study 2 (n = 321), demographic differences in IDEA-TR scores were tested using statistical analyses. Data were collected in 2023 from a total sample of 1056 emerging adults (694 females, 362 males) aged 18-30. Correlation of IDEA-TR subdimensions and total scores with perceived stress, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety scores were calculated. The results of the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a six-factor solution (explaining 59.21% of the variance), which was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results, and the total scale demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .84). The six-factor structure identified in the present study aligns more closely with the original IDEA model than with the previous Turkish adaptation, reflecting updated psychometric evidence. Convergent validity analyses showed significant relationships between the IDEA-TR scores and perceived stress, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety. MANOVA results indicated significant effects of gender, relationship status, parental status, residency, subjective adulthood, and education on IDEA factors. Follow-up analyses indicated that individuals in committed relationships and parents exhibited lower self-focus, whereas subjective adulthood was a strong predictor of emerging adulthood experiences. Women scored higher on feeling in-between, identity exploration, and negativity/instability. Findings suggest the IDEA-TR is a valid and reliable tool and highlight differences in experiences of emerging adulthood across demographic characteristics in Türkiye.

Keywords

• Turkish emerging adults
• the IDEA
• validity
• reliability
• emerging adulthood.

References

1. Akaliyski, P., Vignoles, V. L., Welzel, C., & Minkov, M. (2025). Individualism–collectivism: Reconstructing Hofstede’s dimension of cultural differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000580
2. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
3. Arnett, J. J. (2024). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695937.001.0001
4. Arnett, J. J., & Mitra, D. (2020). Are the features of emerging adulthood developmentally distinctive? A comparison of ages 18–60 in the United States. Emerging Adulthood, 8(5), 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818810073
5. Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). The new life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18–29 years: Implications for mental health. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00080-7
6. Atak, H. (2005). Examination of a new life period in Turkey [Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara University].
7. Atak, H., & Çok, F. (2008). The Turkish version of Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (The IDEA). International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 2(4), 392–396. https://l24.im/A4yP
8. Atak, H., & Çok, F. (2010). İnsan yaşamında yeni bir dönem: Beliren yetişkinlik [A new period in human life: Emerging adulthood]. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Saǧlıǧı Dergisi, 17(1), 39–50. https://cms.galenos.com.tr/Uploads/Article_27682/cogepderg-17-39.pdf

9. Bağcı, İ. (2020). Modernleşme sürecindeki Türkiye’de gençliğin siyasal ve sosyal analizi [Political and social analysis of youth in turkey in modernization process]. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(22), 1511-1539. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.649777
10. Cam, H. H., Ustuner Top, F., & Kuzlu Ayyildiz, T. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and health-related quality of life among university students in Turkey. Current Psychology, 41(2), 1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01674-y
11. Can Gür, G. (2024). Shattered ground, resilient souls: examining coping strategies, social support, and earthquake exposure’s effects on post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms among adolescent and young adults survivors of the 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. Current Psychology, 43(25), 21745–21755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05995-6
12. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., and Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
13. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Crocetti, E., Tagliabue, S., Sugimura, K., Nelson, L. J., Takahashi, A., Niwa, T., Yuko, S. & Jinno, M. (2015). Perceptions of emerging adulthood: A study with Italian and Japanese university students and young workers. Emerging Adulthood, 3(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815569848
15. Cusack, C., & Merchant, C. (2013). The effects of emerging adulthood on stress and depression. Modern Psychological Studies, 18(2), 47–64. https://scholar.utc.edu/mps/vol18/iss2/6
16. Derogatis, L. R. (1975) How to use the syptom distress checklist (SCL-90) in clinical evaluations, psychiatric rating scale. In Derogatis, R. L. (Ed.), Self-Report Rating Scale (pp. 22–36), Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
17. Devellis, R. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th edition). Sage Publications.
18. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
19. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th edition). McGraw-Hill.
20. Gonul, B., & Wängqvist, M. (2021). ‘I Felt Like Being Upgraded’: Emerging adults’ experiences of socioeconomic resources in relation to their vocational identity development in Turkey. Emerging Adulthood, 10(1), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968211054600
21. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289447
22. Kağıtçıbaşı, C. (2005). Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275959
23. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
24. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
25. Köker, S. (1991). Comparison of life satisfaction levels of normal and troubled adolescents [Unpublished master’s thesis, Ankara University].
26. Kuang, J., Zhong, J., Yang, P., Bai, X., Liang, Y., Cheval, B., Herold, F., Wei, G., Taylor, A., Zhang, J., Chen, C., Sun, J., Zou, L., & Arnett, J. J. (2023). Psychometric evaluation of the Inventory of Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA) in China. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(1), 100331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100331
27. Lanctot, J., & Poulin, F. (2018). Emerging adulthood features and adjustment: A person-centered approach. Emerging Adulthood, 6(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817706024
28. Leontopoulou, S., Mavridis, D., & Giotsa, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Greek Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA): University student perceptions of developmental features. Journal of Adult Development, 23, 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9239-4
29. Li, Y. J., & Gong, H. (2018). Being a parent together: Parental role salience promotes an interdependent self-construal. Frontiers in Psychology. 9:1462 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01462
30. Lisha, N. E., Grana, R., Sun, P., Rohrbach, L., Spruijt-Metz, D., Reifman, A., & Sussman, S. (2014). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Revised Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA-R) in a sample of continuation high school students. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 37(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712452664
31. Negru, O. (2012). The time of your life: Emerging adulthood characteristics in a sample of Romanian high-school and university students. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 357–367.
32. OECD. (2025). Education at a Glance 2025: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c0d9c79-en
33. Osborne, J. W. & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/ktzq-jq66
34. Örücü, M. Ç., & Demir, A. G., (2009). Psychometric evaluation of perceived stress scale for Turkish university students. Stress And Health, 25(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1218
35. Reifman, A., Arnett, J. J., & Colwell, M. J. (2007). Emerging adulthood: Theory, assessment, and application. Journal of Youth Development, 2(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2007.359
36. Sánchez-Queija, I., Parra, Á., Camacho, C., & Arnett, J. (2018). Spanish version of the Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA-S). Emerging Adulthood, 8(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696818804938
37. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
38. Şahin, N. H. ve &Durak, A. (1994). Kısa Semptom Envanteri: Türk gençleri için uyarlanması [A study of the Brief Symptom Inventory in Turkish Youth]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44–56.
39. Tinsley, H. E. A., & Tinsley, D. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414
40. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism‐collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169
41. TURKSTAT (2023a, February 24). Evlenme ve boşanma istatistikleri, 2022 [Marriage and divorce statistics, 2022]. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Marriage-and-Divorce-Statistics-2022-49437
42. TURKSTAT (2023b, October 4). Muhtemel eğitim süresi, 2018-2022 [Possible education period, 2018-2022]. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Muhtemel-Egitim-Suresi-2018-2022-49761
43. TURKSTAT (2023c, June 21). Yükseköğretim istihdam göstergeleri, 2022 [Higher education employment indicators, 2022]. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Yuksekogretim-Istihdam-Gostergeleri-2022-49600
44. Yeler, Z., Atak, H., Berber, K., Özdoğan, H. K., & Çok, F. (2024, July 17.). The Inventory of Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood: Findings from different countries. 25th International Psychological Counseling and Guidance Congress, Ankara, Turkey.
45. Yerofeyeva, V. G., Wang, P., Yang, Y., Serobyan, A. K., Grigoryan, A. K., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2024). Shimmering emerging adulthood: in search of the invariant IDEA model for collectivistic countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1349375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349375
46. Zagórska, W., Skoczeń, I., Lipska, A., & Arnett, J. (2023). Polish adaptation of the Inventory of the Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood (IDEA-PL). Current Issues in Personality Psychology. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp/159277