The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal: 

Writing Guidelines

The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal is committed to publishing high-quality research that adheres to the strictest academic standards. To ensure clarity, consistency, and adherence to international academic conventions, authors are required to follow these English writing guidelines based on APA 7th Edition standards. More detailed guidelines can be found at the APA Style website: APA 7th Edition Style.

1. General Format

The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal is published in English.

The manuscript should be a minimum of 5,000 words and a maximum of 10,000 words, including references, tables, and figures. In exceptional cases where your article falls outside these limits, please write to the editor with your justification.

Abbreviations: Typically, terms should only be abbreviated if they are used frequently and the abbreviation would aid the reader. Start by using the full term, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. After the initial introduction, use the abbreviation exclusively.

Anonymity: The manuscript must be fully anonymized, with all identifying information about the authors removed, to ensure a blind peer-review process. Please ensure that names, affiliations, and any other identifying details are omitted from the main document.

Font and Size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point size.

Line Spacing: Double-space all parts of the manuscript.

Template: No specific template is provided. Authors should format their manuscripts according to APA 7 style guidelines, using a free-form style that meets these standards.

2. Anonymity

Anonymization Checklist for The Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal

The purpose of this checklist is to provide a professional guide for authors and reviewers to ensure that all submitted manuscripts are appropriately anonymized, in order to safeguard the privacy of research participants and adhere to ethical and legal standards.

2.1. Identification and Removal of Personal Data

Direct Identifiers: Remove any personal information that directly identifies individuals, such as names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses, from the manuscript.

Indirect Identifiers: Identify and either generalize or eliminate any indirect identifiers that have the potential to enable the identification of individuals, such as job titles, specific locations, or unique combinations of traits.

Institutional Information: Verify that any references to institutions, such as universities or schools, which could potentially lead to identification, are either anonymized or removed from the manuscript, unless they are essential to the study.

2.2. Manuscript Review

Textual Review: Thoroughly examine the entire manuscript to guarantee the absence of any personal data within the text, including acknowledgments, footnotes, or appendices.

Tables and Figures: Confirm that all tables, graphs, and other visual data do not contain any embedded identifiers.

Geographical Data: Verify that mentions of geographical locations are suitably generic to avoid identification.

2.3. Special Considerations for Qualitative Data

Narratives and Quotes: It is essential to anonymize any quotes or narratives that have the potential to reveal the identity of participants.

Case Studies: Care must be taken to ensure that the detailed descriptions provided in case studies do not inadvertently lead to the identification of individuals.

2.4. Digital File Anonymization

Metadata Removal: It is imperative to remove all metadata, such as author names and file creation dates, from digital files.

Embedded Data: It is crucial to ascertain that any embedded data within image files, PDFs, or other media is effectively anonymized.

Revision Histories: It is essential to thoroughly review document revision histories to guarantee the absence of any retained personal information.

2.5. Final Anonymization Verification

Thorough Evaluation: Perform a final verification of the manuscript to ensure that all anonymization procedures have been implemented accurately.

Data Integrity: Verify that the quality and interpretability of the data have not been compromised due to anonymization.

Process Documentation: Provide comprehensive documentation of the anonymization process, detailing the methods employed and the decisions taken.

3. Title Page

Title: Center the title in bold, in the upper half of the page. Capitalize major words.

Author Name(s): 

• Center the author name(s) below the title, one double-spaced line down.
• Include detailed information about all coauthors, including their full names, institutional affiliations, ORCID numbers, and email addresses. Additionally, the authorship order should be clearly indicated, reflecting the level of involvement of each contributor.
• Indicate the corresponding author and a note designating them as the primary contact.

Institutional Affiliation: Center the institutional affiliation directly below the author name(s).

ORCiDs: List ORCID numbers for all authors directly below the institutional affiliation.

Author Note: Place the author note at the bottom of the title page.

Required Sections: The title page must include the following sections:

Conflict of Interest: A statement disclosing any potential conflicts of interest.

Funding: Information about the funding sources that supported the research.

Ethical Disclosure: A statement confirming ethical approval for the study.

Data Availability: Information about the availability of data supporting the findings of the study.

Additional Sections (if applicable):

Author Contributions: Provide a description of each author’s contributions if applicable.

Acknowledgements: Include any acknowledgments for assistance or support received during the research.

Note: The title page must be uploaded as a separate file to ensure anonymity during the review process. It should include detailed information about all coauthors, including their full names, institutional affiliations, and up-to-date author email addresses. Additionally, authorship order should be clearly indicated, reflecting the level of involvement of each contributor.

4. Abstract

A concise summary of the research, typically between 150–250 words, that provides an overview of the study's purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. It should be written as a single paragraph without indentation and followed by 5-7 keywords.

Placement: The abstract should begin on a new page after the title page.

Length: Limit the abstract to 150–250 words.

Format: Provide a single paragraph without indentation.

Keywords: Include 5-7 keywords below the abstract, italicized and separated by commas.

4. Main Body Structure

The main body of the manuscript should include the following sections:

Introduction: This section introduces the research topic, outlines the research problem, and sets the context for the study. It should clearly state the research questions or hypotheses and explain the significance of the research.

Method: The Method section details how the study was conducted, including descriptions of participants, materials, procedures, and data analysis techniques. This section must also include a statement confirming that ethical approval was obtained for the study.

Findings: The findings of the research should be given in a logical order, typically following the sequence of the research questions or hypotheses. Please use descriptive language to clearly explain what the data shows. Avoid interpreting the results in this section; save interpretation for the Discussion section. Use tables, graphs, and figures to present quantitative data effectively. Ensure that all visuals are labeled appropriately and referenced in the text. For qualitative data, use direct quotes, themes, or other relevant methods to highlight key findings. For quantitative studies, report statistical significance, effect sizes, confidence intervals, and other relevant statistical details. In qualitative research, present the main themes or patterns identified, supported by relevant quotes or examples. Ensure that the findings are directly related to the research questions. If necessary, divide the Findings section into subsections, each focusing on a particular aspect of the data. Report all relevant findings, including unexpected or negative results, without bias.

Discussion: The Discussion section interprets the findings, explaining their implications and how they contribute to the existing body of knowledge. It must include subsections on the study's limitations, practical or theoretical implications, and suggestions for future research.

Conclusion: The Conclusion summarizes the main findings of the study and their relevance. It should be concise and reflect on the research’s overall contributions and potential impact.

5. In-Text Citations and References

In-Text Citations: Follow the author–date citation style (e.g., Smith, 2020).

Reference List: The reference section should start on a new page with the heading "References," centered at the top. Use APA 7 style for formatting references. More detailed guidelines can be found at the APA Style website: APA 7th Edition Style.

Please sort the references in alphabetical order without numbering them, and ensure that DOI numbers are included for those references where they are available.

Hanging Indent: Use a hanging indent for each reference entry.

6. Tables and Figures

Placement: Tables and figures should be embedded within the text at appropriate points where they are first mentioned, rather than placed at the end of the manuscript.

Numbering: Number tables and figures in the order in which they are mentioned in the text.

Titles and Captions: Provide a brief title for each table and figure, italicized and placed above the table or figure. Captions should be placed below figures, offering additional context or explanation.

Figures need to be uploaded in the best possible resolution.

7. Appendices (if applicable)

Format: Start each appendix on a new page with the heading "Appendix" (or "Appendix A," "Appendix B," etc.) centered at the top.

Order: Appendices should appear in the order they are mentioned in the text.

ETHICS POLICY

Publication Ethics
The publication process at Turkish PCG Journal is the basis of the improvement and dissemination of information objectively and respectfully. Therefore, the procedures in this process improves the quality of the studies. Peer-reviewed studies are the ones that support and materialize the scientific method. At this point, it is of utmost importance that all parties included in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, reviewers and editors) comply with the standards of ethical considerations. Turkish PCG Journal expects all parties to hold the following ethical responsibilities.
The following ethical duties and responsibilities are written in the light of the guide and policies made by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
The authors who submit their manuscripts to Turkish PCG Journal are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities:
Author(s) must submit original studies to the journal. If they utilize or use other studies, they must make the in-text and end-text references accurately and completely.
People who have not contributed to the study at the intellectual level should not be indicated as author.
If the manuscripts submitted to be published are subject of conflicting interests or relations, these must be explained.
During the review process of their manuscripts, author(s) may be asked to supply raw data. In such a case, author(s) should be ready to submit such data and information to the editorial and scientific boards.
Author(s) should document that they have the participants' consent and the necessary permissions related with the sharing and research/analysis of the data that are used.
Author(s) bears the responsibility to inform the editor of the journal or publisher if they happen to notice a mistake in their study which is in early release or publication process and to cooperate with the editors during the correction or withdrawal process.
Authors cannot submit their studies to multiple journals simultaneously. Each submission can be made only after the previous one is completed. A study published in another journal cannot be submitted to Turkish PCG Journal.
Author responsibilities of a study whose review process has begun cannot be requested to change (e.g.: adding an author, reordering of author names).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
The editor and field editors of Turkish PCG Journal should hold the following ethical responsibilities that are based on the guides "COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" and "COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors" published as open Access by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
General duties and responsibilities
Editors are responsible for each study published in Turkish PCG Journal. In this respect, the editors have the following roles and responsibilities:
 - Making efforts to meet the demand for knowledge from readers and authors,
 - Ensuring the continuous development of the journal,
 - Managing the procedures aimed to improve the quality of the studies published in the journal,
 - Supporting freedom of expression,
 - Ensuring academic integrity,
 - Following the procedures without making concessions on intellectual property rights and ethical standards,
 - Being transparent and clear in issues that require correction or explanation.

Relationships with Readers
Editors must make decisions taking into consideration the knowledge, skills and expectations of all readers, researchers and practitioners need. They must also ensure that the published studies contribute to literature and be original. Moreover, they must take notice of the feedback received from researchers and practitioners and provide explanatory and informative feedback.

Relationships with Authors
Editors have the following duties and responsibilities in their relations with authors:
 - Editors must make positive or negative decisions about the studies' importance, originality, validity, clarity in wording and suitability with the journal's aims and objectives.
 - Editors must accept the studies that are within the scope of publication into pre review process unless there are serious problems with the study.
 - Editors must not ignore positive suggestions made by reviewers unless there are serious problems with the study.
 - New editors, unless there are serious issues, must not change the previous editor's decisions about the studies.
 - "Blind Review and Review Process" must be published and editors must prevent possible diversions in the defined processes.
 - Editors must publish an "Author's Guide" that is comprehensive enough in answering queries by authors. This guide must be updated regularly.
 - Authors should be provided with explanatory and informative feedback.

Relationships with Reviewers
Editors have the following duties and responsibilities in their relations with reviewers:
Editors must
 - choose reviewers according to the subject of the study.
 - provide the information and guidance reviewers may need during the review process.
 - observe whether there are conflicting interests between reviewers and authors.
 - keep the identities of reviewers confidential in blind review.
 - encourage the reviewers to review the manuscript in an unbiased, scientific and objective tone.
 - evaluate reviewers regularly based on criteria like performance and timing.
 - develop practices and policies that increase the performance of reviewers.
 - take necessary steps to update the reviewer pool dynamically.
 - prevent unkind and unscientific reviews.
 - make effort to ensure the reviewer pool has a wide range.

Relationships with the Editorial Board
Editors must make sure that the members of the editorial board follow the procedures in accordance with the publication policies and guidelines, and must inform the members about the publication policies and developments. The editors must also train new members of the editorial board and provide the information they need.
Moreover, editors must
 - ensure that the members of the editorial board review the manuscripts in an unbiased and independent manner.
 - select the new members of the editorial board from those who can contribute to the journal and are qualified enough.
 - send manuscripts for review based on the subject of expertise of the editorial board members.
 - regularly communicate with the editorial board.
 - arrange regular meetings with the editorial board for the development of publication policies and the journal.

Relationships with the Journal's Owner and Publisher
The relationship between the editors and publisher is based on the principle of the independency of editors. All the decisions made by the editors are independent of the publisher and the owner of the journal as required by the agreement made between editors and publisher.

Editorial and Blind Review Processes
Editors are obliged to comply with the policies of "Blind Review and Review Process" stated in the journal's publication policies. Therefore, the editors ensure that each manuscript is reviewed in an unbiased, fair and timely manner.
Quality Assurance
Editors must make sure that articles in the journal are published in accordance with the publication policies of the journal and international standards.
Protection of Personal Information
Editors are supposed to protect the personal information related with the subjects or visuals in the studies being reviewed, and to reject the study if there is no documentation of the subjects' consent. Furthermore, editors are supposed to protect the personal information of the authors, reviewers and readers.
Encouraging Ethical Rules
Editors are supposed to protect human and animal rights in the studies being reviewed and must reject the experimental studies which do not have ethical and related committee’s approval for the population given in such studies.
Turkish PCG Journal considers it vital that in manuscripts ethical codes be defined for each and every işlem and field because the journal, by its very nature, values and complies with these codes sensitively. It reserves the right to ask for additional documents, evidence and explanation where necessary. Editors are in charge of taking necessary action when the required documents are not provided within a reasonable amount of time.
Precautions against possible Abuse and Malpractice
Editors are supposed to take precautions against possible abuse and malpractice. They must conduct investigations meticulously and objectively in determining and evaluating complaints about such situations. They must also share the results of the investigation.
Ensuring Academic Integrity
Editors must make sure that the mistakes, inconsistencies or misdirections in studies are corrected quickly.
Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
Editors are responsible for protecting the intellectual property rights of all the articles published in the journal and the rights of the journal and author(s) in cases where these rights are violated. Also, editors must take the necessary precautions in order to prevent the content of all published articles from violating the intellectual property rights of other publications. See Plagiarism Check
Constructiveness and Openness to Discussion
Editors must
 - pay attention to the convincing criticism about studies published in the journal and must have a constructive attitude towards such criticism.
 - grant the right of reply to the author(s) of the criticized study.
 - not ignore or exclude the study that include negative results.
Complaints
Editors must examine the complaints from authors, reviewers or readers and respond to them in an explanatory and enlightening manner.
Political and Economic Apprehensions
Neither the owner of the journal, publisher or any other political or economic factor can influence the independent decision taking of the editors.
Conflicting Interests
Editors, acknowledging that there may be conflicting interests between author(s), reviewers and other editors, guarantee that the publication process of the manuscripts will be completed in an independent and unbiased manner

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
The fact that all manuscripts are reviewed through "Blind Review" has a direct influence on the publication quality. This process ensures confidentiality by objective and independent review. The review process at Turkish PCG Journal is carried out on the principle of double blind review. Reviewers do not contact the authors directly, and the reviews and comments are conveyed through the journal management system. In this process, the reviewer views on the evaluation forms and full texts are assigned to the author(s) by the editor. Therefore, the reviewers doing review work for Turkish PCG Journal are supposed to bear the following ethical responsibilities:
Reviewers must
 - agree to review only in their subject of expertise.
 - review in an unbiased and confidential manner.
 - inform the editor of the journal if they think that they encounter conflict of interests and decline to review the manuscript during the review process.
 - dispose the manuscripts they have reviewed in accordance with the principle of confidentiality after the review process. Reviewers can use the final versions of the manuscripts they have reviewed only after publication.
 - review the manuscript objectively and only in terms of its content and ensure that nationality, gender, religious and political beliefs, and economic apprehension do not influence the review.
 - review the manuscript in a constructive and kind tone, avoid making personal comments including hostility, slander and insult.
 - review the manuscript they have agreed to review on time and in accordance with the ethical rules stated above.

Ethical Responsibilities of Publisher
Turkish Psychological Counselling and Guidance Association, publisher of Turkish PCG Journal, is a non-profit civil society organization working for the good of the public. As required by its founding policy, Turkish Psychological Counselling and Guidance Association publishes the journal to make its knowledge public at international standards. Therefore, the Board of Turkish Psychological Counselling and Guidance Association is conscious of the fact that they must observe the ethical responsibilities below and act accordingly:
 - Editors are responsible for all the processes that the manuscripts submitted to Turkish PCG Journal will go through. Within this framework, ignoring the economic or political interests, the decision-makers are the editors.
 - The publisher undertakes to have an independent editorial decision made.
 - The publisher protects the intellectual property rights of all the articles published in Turkish PCG Journal and holds the responsibility to keep a record of each unpublished article.
 - The publisher bears all the responsibility to take the precautions against scientific abuse, fraud and plagiarism related with editors.
Unethical Behaviour
Should you encounter any unethical act or content in Turkish PCG Journal apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail at info@pdrdergisi.org.

AFTER ACCEPTANCE
At Turkish PCG Journal, the accepted manuscripts undergo the processes of plagiarism detection, preparation of bibliography, cross-reference and reference check, layout and galley, assigning a DOI number and being put into early release. The manuscripts in early release are published in the volume and issue determined by the editorial board.
Since Turkish PCG Journal claims no fees for article review or printing and no subscription fees for access to articles, it has no source of income. However, the following pecuniary obligations of the accepted manuscripts lie with the author(s).
Plagiarism Detection
In accordance with its publishing policies, Turkish PCG Journal oblige each study that has undergone the "Blind Review Process" to be detected for plagiarism to protect the integrity of the study. Therefore, both Turkish and English copies of the study are detected for plagiarism by a company chosen by the editorial board. Incurring fees are paid by the author(s).
The plagiarism detection is done by Turnitin and iThenticate softwares. The matches found in each study after plagiarism detection are analyzed in detail and those matches with correct reference and cross-reference are sorted. In the next step, the mistakes in the remaining matches are determined and reported to the editorial board. The board, then, makes a final decision in the light of the plagiarism detection report. The author(s) may be asked to correct the mistakes listed in the report or the study may be returned to the author(s).
References and Citation Control
Scientific research builds upon previous studies. In new studies, references and attributions to the previous studies are provided within the framework of certain rules. Intentional or unintentional mistakes in scientific studies harm the reliability of the study and publication.
Turkish PCG Journal, in accordance with its publication ethics, considers it to be an obligation for the accepted studies to have correct and complete references and attributions. Therefore, each study, after acceptance, is checked in terms of bibliography, referencing and attribution by a company chosen by the editorial board. Incurring costs lie with the author(s).
The full Turkish and English texts of the accepted studies are processed for bibliography, referencing and attribution check in the following steps:
Bibliography is prepared according to the APA Referencing Style Guide 6th Edition.
It is checked whether the in-text references of the references given in the bibliography are in accordance with rules and regulations; and mistakes are corrected.
Attributions of the in-text references are checked. The author(s) is asked to provide the missing ones, and the incorrect ones are corrected.
For the Turkish full text Turkish rules and regulations of referencing are used, and for the English full texts English rules and regulations of referencing are used.
Layout and Galley
Turkish PCG Journal requires that the articles be printed in a common type of and complete page layout for formal integrity, readability and standards. Therefore, the studies whose plagiarism detection and bibliography preparation is finished, are sent to a company chosen by the editorial board for layout and galley. Incurring costs for page layout and preparation of the copy for print lie with the author(s).
Assigning a DOI Number
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is a unique access number that enables the identification and accessibility of each article published electronically. It is mandatory that each article published in Turkish PCG Journal or in early release is assigned a DOI number.
After acceptance, the manuscripts which are checked for plagiarism and bibliography and ready for publication are given a DOI number by the Editorial Board.
Language Editing
The language (English) of the manuscripts submitted to Turkish PCG Journal must be accurate in terms of rules of grammar and scientific literature and must have a plain and clear language quality. Manuscripts should be written in fluent language and free of foreign words. If the manuscripts are edited before they are submitted for review, the process of publication gets healthy.
The editorial board demand that the manuscripts be edited for language mistakes during the review process or after acceptance. The author(s) who has been requested to get his/her manuscript edited must do so referring to one of the companies below and present a related document to the editorial board afterwards.