Development of Accountability Scale for School Counselor: Investigation of Psychometric Properties

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 59, 631 - 648, 28.12.2020

Zeynep Karataş Yasemin Yavuzer Özlem Tagay

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable accountability scale that can be used to determine the level of accountability of school counselors. The study group consists of 494 school counselors, 298 women and 196 men. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for the construct validity of the scale. Cronbach’s Alpha internal consistency analysis and Spearman Brown two half reliability analyses were used as reliability analysis, when the results of exploratory factor analysis were examined in the study, it was seen that the scale had a structure with four factors (remedial services, developmental services, support services, preventive services) and this structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability analysis of the obtained scale also showed that the scale is reliable. The findings were discussed in light of the literature and various suggestions were made.

Keywords

Accountability, Scale, Evidence-Based Practices, School Counseling and Guidance, Services, School Counselor

References

• Accountability System (2017). https://www.spps.org/Page/25482. Saint Paul Public Schools.
• Akbulut, Y. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPSS Uygulamaları. İstanbul: İdeal Kültür Yayıncılık.
• American School Counselor Association. (2012). The ASCA national model: A framework for school counseling programs (3. bs.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
• Beesley, D. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of school counselor effectiveness: Collaborating for student success. Education, 125, 259- 270.
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2002). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Routledge.
• Burck, H. D., Cottingham, H. F., & Reardon R. C. (1973). Counseling and Accountability: Methods and Critique. ABD: Pergamon Press Inc.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (19. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (21. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2015). Psikolojik Test ve Değerleme: Testlere ve Ölçmeye Giriş. (Çev. Ezel Tavşancıl) Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
• Cook, S.C., Schwartz, A.C., & Kaslow, N.J. (2017). Evidence-based psychotherapy: Advantages and challenges. Neurotherapeutics, 14(3), 537-545.
• Dutar, Ş. & Karataş, Z. (2018). Hesap verebilirlik kavramı: Psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik alanına yansımaları. Ege Bilimsel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1(1), 1-27.
• Fayers, P.M., & Hand, D.J. (1997). Factor analysis, causal indicators, and quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 6, 139–150.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
• Gedikoğlu, T. (2012). Yükseköğretimde hesap verebilirlik. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 2(3), 142-150. DOI: 10.2399/yod.12.019
• Güven, M., & Kılıç, S. (2016). Okul psikolojik danışmanlarının kanıta dayalı psikolojik danışma ve rehberlik uygulamaları hakkındaki görüşleri. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5, 42-50.
• Güvenç, M. (2001). Okullardaki rehberlik faaliyetlerinin yürütülmesinde karşılaşılan güçlükler. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Niğde Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Niğde.
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Hiebert, B. (1997). Integrating evaluation into counseling practice: Accountability and evaluation intertwined. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 31(2), 1-2.
• Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 55-65.
• Işık, Ş., Çarkıt, E., & Aslan, A. M. (2019). Accountability practices of school counselors. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2019056111
• Kline, P. (2014). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. New York: Routledge.
• Krumboltz, J.D. (1974). An accountability model for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 52(10), 639-646. Doi: 10.1002/j.2164-4918.1974.tb03952.x
• Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
• Lewis, C.A., Francis, L.J., Shevlin, M., & Forrest, S. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the french translation of the abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 179-185.
• Marcoulides, G., & Schumacher, R. (2001). New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates, Publishers.
• McIntire, S.A., & Miller, L.A. (2000). Foundations of Psychological Testing. Boston: McGraw Hill.
• Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Australia: Australian Copyright.
• Robinson, J.P., Shaver, P.R., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1991). Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation in Measure of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego: California Academic Press.
• Scarborough, J. L. (2005). The school counselor activity rating scale: An instrument for gathering process data. Professional School Counseling, 8, 274–283.
• Schumacher, R., & Lomax, R. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Seçer, İ. (2013). SPSS ve LISREL İle Pratik Veri Analizi: Analiz ve Raporlaştırma. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranış Bilimlerinde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
• Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S., & Ullman, J.B. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Tanhan, A. (2020). COVID-19 Sürecinde Online Seslifoto (OSF) yöntemiyle biyopsikososyal manevi ve ekonomik meseleleri ve genel iyi oluş düzeyini ele almak: OSF’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 1029-1086.
• Tanhan, A., Karaman, M.A., & Nalbant, A. (2020). The effect of counseling on anxiety level from the perspective of ecological systems theory: A quasi-experimental pre-test - post-test control group study, International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(3), 58-69.
• Yates, C. (2013). Evidence-based practice: The components, history, and process. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 4(1)-41-54.
• Yıldıran, G. (2014). Psychological counseling, advocacy, accountability, and technology. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 31(1), 1-6.
• Yiyit, F. (2001). Okul psikolojik danışmanlarının yetkinlik beklentilerini ölçmeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Adana.
• Zyromski, B., Dimmitt, C., Mariani, M., & Griffith, C. (2018). Evidence-based school counseling: Models for integrated practice and school counselor education. Professional School Counseling, 21(1), 1-12.