Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanarak Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 11 Issue: 61, 161 - 175, 30.06.2021

İbrahim Dalmış Seher Akdeniz Erdal Hamarta

Abstract

Bu araştırmada Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin Türk kültürüne uyarlanarak psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma grubu, yaşları 18-66 arasında değişen 311 kadın ve 291 erkek olmak üzere toplam 602 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını incelemek için yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda uyum indekslerinin kabul edilebilir sınırlar içinde yer aldığı tespit edilmiştir. Güvenirlik analizi sonuçları yeterli güven aralığına işaret etmiştir. Yapılan araştırma sonucunda Kolektif Dayanıklılık Ölçeği’nin akademik ve saha çalışmalarında kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme ve veri toplama aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bulgular alan yazın çerçevesinde tartışılmış ve çeşitli öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Kolektif Dayanıklılık, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik

Adaptation of Collective Resilience Scale to Turkish Culture and Examination of its Psychometric Properties

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Collective Resilience Scale by adapting it to Turkish culture. The sample of the study consisted of 602 participants between 18 and 66 years of age, 311 of them being females and 291 males. In consequence of the confirmatory factor analysis conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale, it was determined that the fit indices were within acceptable values. Reliability analysis results indicated an adequate confidence interval. In consequence of the research, it was determined that the Collective Resilience Scale is a valid and reliable measurement and data collection tool that can be used in academic and field studies. The findings were discussed within the framework of the literature and various suggestions were made.

Keywords

Collective Resilience Scale, Reliability, Validity

References

• Büyükozturk, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation]. Pegem.
• Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3 (1), 14-25. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/bs.3830030103
• Chandra, A., Acosta, J., Meredith, L.S., Snaches, K., Stern, S., Uscher-Pines, L. Williams, M., & Yeung, D. (2010). Understanding community resilience in the context of national health security. Rand Corporation.
• Drury, J. (2012). Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: A social identity model. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health and well-being (pp. 195–215). Psychology Press.
• Drury, J., Cocking, C., & Reicher, S. (2009). The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 27(1), 66-95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228642933_The_Nature_of_Collective_Resilience_Survivor_Reactions_to_the_2005_London_Bombings
• Drury J. & Reicher, S. (1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2(4), 381-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299024005
• Dynes, R.R. (2003). Finding order in disorder: Continuities in the 9-11 response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21(3), 9-23. http://ijmed.org/articles/229/download/
• Elcheroth, G. & Drury, J. (2020). Collective resilience in times of crisis: Lessons from the literature for socially effective responses to the pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(3), 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12403
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGrawHill.
• Freud, S. (1921). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In A. Dickson (Ed.), Civilization, society and religion (pp. 91-178). Penguin.
• Johnson, N.R. (1988). Fire in a crowded theatre: A descriptive investigation of the emergence of panic. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 6 (1), 7-26. http://ijmed.org/articles/134/download/
• Kendra, J., & Wachtendorf, T. (2001). Elements of community resilience in the World Trade Center attack. https://udspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/727/PP318.pdf?sequence=1&origin=publication_detail
• Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
• Le Bon, G. (1895). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. Norman S.Berg.
• Mawson, A.R. (2005). Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry, 68(2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2005.68.2.95
• Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F., & Pfefferbaum, R.L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
• Pfefferbaum, R.L., Pfefferbaum, B., Van Horn, R.L., Klomp, R.W., Norris, F.H., & Reissman, D.B. (2013). The Communities Advancing Resilience Toolkit (CART): An intervention to build community resilience to disasters. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 19 (3), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318268aed8
• Pfefferbaum, R.L., Pfefferbaum, B., Zhao, Y.D., Van Horn R.L., McCarter, G.S., & Leonard, M.B. (2016). Assessing community resilience: A CART survey application in an impoverished urban community. Disaster Health, 3 (2), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665044.2016.1189068
• Pfefferbaum, R.L., Pfefferbaum, B., Nitiema, P., Houston, J.B., & Van Horn, R.L. (2015). Assessing community resilience: An application of the expanded CART survey instrument with affiliated colunteer responders. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(2), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550295
• Pfefferbaum, B., Reissman, D.B., Pfefferbaum, R.L., Klomp, R.W., & Gurwitch, R.H. (2007) Building resilience to mass trauma events. In L.S. Doll, S.E. Bonzo, J.A. Mercy, D.A. Sleet, & E.N. Haas (Eds.), Handbook of Injury and Violence Prevention (pp.347-358). Springer.
• Pfefferbaum, R.L., Reissman, D.B., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F., Norris, F.H., & Klomp, R.W. (2008). Factors in the development of community resilience to disasters. In M. Blumenfield & R.J. Ursano (Eds.), Intervention and resilience after mass trauma (pp.49-68). Cambridge University Press.
• Reicher S. (1996). ‘The Battle of Westminster’: Developing the social identity model of crowd behavior in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26 (1), 115-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199601)26:1<115::AID-EJSP740>3.0.CO;2 Z
• Ripley, A. (2005). How to get out alive. Time, 165, 48-52.
• Schultz, D.P. (1964). Panic behavior: Discussions and readings. Random House.
• Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610904
• Secer, I. (2015). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi [Practical data analysis with SPSS and LISREL]. Ani.
• Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Harper.
• Sime, J.D. (1983). Affiliative behavior during escape to building exits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80019-X
• Sime, J.D. (1990). The Concept of ‘Panic’. In D. Canter (Ed.), Fires and human behavior (pp.63-81). David Fulton.
• Smelser, N.J. (1962). Theory of collective behavior. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Strauss, A.L. (1944). The literature on panic. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 39(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062594
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
• Tierney, K.J. (2002). Strength of a city: A disaster research perspective on the World Trade Center attack. https://items.ssrc.org/after-september-11.
• Tierney K, Bevc C., & Kuligowski E. (2006). Metaphors matter: Disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 604(1), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0002716205285589
• Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisationtheory. Oxford.
• Turner, R.H. & Killian, L.M. (1957). Collective behavior. Prentice-Hall.
• Van Bavel, J. J., Boggio, P., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M., . . . & Drury, J. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behavior, 4, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
• Wessely, S. (2005). Don’t panic! Short and long term psychological reactions to the new terrorism: The role of information and the authorities. Journal of Mental Health 14(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230500048099