ANALYZING THE RISKS OF TRANSPORTATION OF DANGEROUS GOODS BASED ON THE ADR

Year 2019, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 1 - 13, 30.06.2019

M. Tuğçe Dumlupınar Yücel Öztürkoğlu

https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.411953

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Tehlikeli madde
taşımacılığı, insan yaşamının güvenliği açısından üzerine düşülmesi gereken ve
beraberinde alanında uzmanlığı gerektiren önemli bir konudur. Tehlikeli madde
lojistiği sırasında meydana gelebilecek riskleri minimize etmek, tehlikeleri ve
zararları önlemek amacıyla, dünya genelinde standardize edilmiş ve sistematik hale
getirilmiş bir bütün olarak gerçekleştirilmesine olanak tanıyan düzenlemeler
sunulmuştur. Bu düzenlemeler içinde, karayolu taşımacılığı sürecinde gereken
kuralları ortaya koyan düzenleme ADR konvansiyonudur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, tehlikeli
madde taşımacılığı yapan lojistik firmalar için bir ölçek çalışması yapılarak
elde edilen faktörlerin ADR bakış açısı ile analiz etmektir. İlk olarak,
literatürden tehlikeli madde taşımacılığı sırasında meydana gelebilecek potansiyel
risk faktörlerinin kapsamlı bir listesini oluşturulmuştur. Tespit edilen otuz
beş risk faktörü, tehlikeli madde taşımacılığı konusunda uzmanlaşmış 188 kişi
tarafından değerlendirilmiştir.  Açıklayıcı
faktör analizi sonucu elde edilen 22 temel risk, beş ana faktör altında
sınıflandırılmıştır. Bu başlıklar; insan faktörü, şirket faktörü, malzeme ve
ambalajlama, aracın durumu, çevre ve trafik faktörü olarak adlandırılmıştır.

Keywords

ADR, Tehlikeli Madde, Tehlikeleri Madde Taşımacılığı, Riskler

TEHLİKELİ MADDE TAŞIMACILIĞINDA ADR’YE GÖRE RİSKLERİN ANALİZ EDİLMESİ

Abstract

The transport of
dangerous substances is an important issue that needs to be emphasized and
requires expertise in terms of the safety of human life. In order to minimize
the risks that may arise during the logistics of hazardous materials and to
prevent damages and hazards, regulations have been introduced that enable them
to be realized in a standardized and systematic whole world. Among these
arrangements, the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of
Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) is the convention that sets out the rules
required in the road transport process. The aim of this study is to analyze the
factors obtained by carrying out a scale study for the logistics companies
carrying out dangerous goods transportation with ADR point of view. First, a
comprehensive list of potential risk factors that may occur during transport of
dangerous goods from the literature has been established. Thirty-five risk
factors were evaluated by 188 persons specialized in hazardous goods transport.
The 22 main risks obtained by the exploratory factor analysis are classified
under five main factors. These titles; human factor, company factor, material
and packaging, vehicle status, environment and traffic factor.

Keywords

ADR, Dangerous Goods, Dangerous Goods Transportation, Risks

References

• Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri - SPSS Uygulamalı. Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
• Arslantürk, Z. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Araştırma Metot ve Teknikleri. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Vakfı Yayınları.
• Batarliene, N. (2008). Dangerous Goods Transportation: New Technologies and Reducing of the Accidents. Journal of Konbin, 8(1), 211-222.
• Caliskan, A., Kalkan, M., and Ozturkoglu, Y. (2017). City Logistics in Izmir: Problems and Recovery Proposals. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 26 (2), 145-162.
• Dalgakiran, A. B., & Öztürkoğlu, Y. (2017). Scale and Relationship Analysis for Turkish Furniture Sector. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(1), 147-161.
• Ding, L., Chen, Y. and Li, J. (2016). Monitoring Dangerous Goods in Container Yard Using the Internet of Things. Scientific Programming.
• ECE/TRANS/225 (2013). European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR).Geneva: UNECE.
• Erkut, E and Verter, V. (1998). Modeling of Transport Risk for Hazardous Materials. Operation Research, 46(5), 625-642.
• Fabiano, B., Curro, F., Palazzi, E., & Pastorino, R. (2002). A Framework for Risk Assessment and Decision-Making Strategies in Dangerous Good Transportation. Journal of hazardous materials, 93(1), 1-15.
• George, D. and Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, Boston: Pearson Education India.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. 5(3), 207-219.
• Hazardous Materials Management Handbook (2016). Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, Australia: Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism.
• Khan, F.I. and Abbasi, S.A. (1999) Major accidents in Process Industries and an Analysis of Causes and Consequences. Journal of Loss Prevention in the process Industries, 12(5), 361-378.
• Macciotta, R., Robitaille, S., Hendry, M. and Martin, C. D. (2018). Hazard Ranking for Railway Transport of Dangerous Goods in Canada. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6(1), 43-50.
• Oggero, A., Darbra, R. M., Munoz, M., Planas, E. and Casal, J. (2006). A Survey of Accidents Occurring During the Transport of Hazardous Substances by Road and Rail. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 133(1-3), 1-7.
• Ozturkoglu, Y. and Esendemir, E. (2014). ERP Software selection using IFS and GRA methods. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 5(5), 363-370.
• Ozturkoglu, Y., Ozbiltekin, M., Gozacan, N. and Surgec, (2013). City Logistics: Sample Implementation of Izmir City. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 5(3), 206-213.
• Rada, E. C., Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2017). Individual Risk Evaluation and Interventions for Mitigation in the Transportation of Hazardous Goods: A Case Study. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 121, p. 06008). EDP Sciences.
• Rooney, T., Podger, G. and Hackitt, J. (2008). The Role of the Health and Safety Commission and the Health and Safety Executive in Regulating Workplace Health and Safety: Third Report of Session 2007-08. London: The Stationery Office.
• Saat, M. R., Werth, C. J., Schaeffer, D., Yoon, H., & Barkan, C. P. (2014). Environmental Risk Analysis of Hazardous Material Rail Transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 264, 560-569.
• Sabegh, M. H. Z., Ozturkoglu, Y., & Kim, T. (2016). Green Supply Chain Management Practices' Effect on the Performance of Turkish Business Relationships. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 2(4), 982.
• Şencan, M. and Yavuz, H. (2018). Transportation of Dangerous Goods: Turkey Model. Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, 3(2), 65-74.
• Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Torretta, V., Rada, E. C., Schiavon, M., & Viotti, P. (2017). Decision Support Systems for Assessing Risks involved in Transporting Hazardous Materials: A Review. Safety Science, 92, 1-9.
• Verter, V. and Y. Kara, B. (2001). A GIS-Based Framework for Hazardous Materials Transport Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, 21, 1109–1120.
• Zisiopoulou, A., Vrysagotis, V., & Geronikolou, A. (2018). Managerial Proposals for the ADR Transport Industry in Greece during the Crisis Period of 2015. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 8(2), 13-31.