Research Article

Analysis of the Relationship Between Tax Burden and Labor Force Participation Rates in OECD Countries

Volume: 37 Number: 2 April 15, 2023
Batuhan Yıldırım , Yeşim Kuştepeli *
TR EN

Analysis of the Relationship Between Tax Burden and Labor Force Participation Rates in OECD Countries

Abstract

The labor force participation rate has become a vital indicator for economies, especially after the industrial revolution. Because of the mass production after the industrial revolution, the necessity of raw materials increased, which also brought a rise in labor demand. Thus, the labor force partici- pation rate and its determinants have become essential subjects for policymakers. The purpose of the study is to find out and evaluate the effect of the tax burden on labor force participation rate in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. The selected countries are determined in accordance with the availability of the data. Panel data estimations were implemented to data set, and due to cross-sectional dependency and autocorrelation prob- lems, the GLS period SURestimation method and cross-sectional covariance methods were used. The findings revealed that tax burden has a negative and significant impact on the labor force participation rate.

Keywords

Labor force participation rate , OECD , period SUR model , tax burden

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). Sage Publications.
  2. Ari, Y. O., & Yıldız, Ü. (2018). Causality relationship between transfer expenditures and labor force participation rate in Turkey. Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies, 4(2), 58–72.
  3. Aydın, F. F., & Levent, C. (2022). The effect of tax wedge and industrialization on female labor force participation. International Journal of Contemporary Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(1), 93–116.
  4. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. [CrossRef]
  5. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009). Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(2), 79–101. [CrossRef]
  6. Blundell, R. (1995). The Impact of Taxation on Labour Force Participation and Labour Supply. OECD Jobs Study Working Papers, No. 8. OECD Publishing.
  7. Duval, R., Eris, M., & Furceri, D. (2010). Labour force participation hysteresis in industrial countries: Evidence and causes. OECD Economics Department.
  8. Favreault, M., Ratcliffe, C., & Toder, E. (1999). Labor force participation of older workers: Prospective changes and potential policy responses. National Tax Journal, 52(3), 483–503. [CrossRef]
  9. Gillman, M. (2011). Advanced modern macroeconomics: Analysis and application. Financial Times Press.
  10. Giovanis, Ö. Ö. , Gündüz, S. , Akılotu, E. , Giovanis, E., & Uyar, N. (2018). Artan Katılım Birikim Getiriyor mu? Kadının İşgücüne Katılımı ve Yurtiçi tasarruf üzerine bir Panel veri analizi. Aydın İktisat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 30–49.
APA
Yıldırım, B., & Kuştepeli, Y. (2023). Analysis of the Relationship Between Tax Burden and Labor Force Participation Rates in OECD Countries. Trends in Business and Economics, 37(2), 91-97. https://doi.org/10.5152/TBE.2022.221122