Does Female Political Empowerment Reduce Energy Vulnerability? Evidence from the European Union
Abstract
Geopolitical risks, uneven resource distribution, and increasing energy demand have made long-term energy supply security a top global priority. In this context, energy vulnerabilitydefined as the lack of equal access to reliable and sustainable energy-has drawn particular attention due to its disproportionate impact on socioeconomically disadvantaged women. This study brings a gender-sensitive perspective to the energy vulnerability literature by empirically examining the impact of women's political empowerment on energy vulnerability within the context of European Union countries. Additionally, it analyzes the effects of research and development (R&D) expenditures and economic size (GDP) on energy vulnerability. Using panel data from 23 EU member states covering the period 2010–2019, the study employs a bootstrapped panel quantile regression approach. The findings indicate that women’s political empowerment significantly reduces energy vulnerability in countries with lower vulnerability levels; however, this effect weakens in countries with higher vulnerability. R&D expenditures consistently reduce energy vulnerability across all quantiles, strengthening the resilience of energy systems. On the other hand, economic size shows a positive association with vulnerability, suggesting that larger economies face greater energy risks due to their complex infrastructures and high consumption levels. These results highlight the critical importance of policy frameworks that holistically integrate gender equality, technological innovation, and sustainable economic governance in reducing energy vulnerability.
Keywords
Energy Vulnerability , Female Political Empowerment , Bootstrapped Panel Quantile Regression
References
- Abdelkawy, N. A. (2024). Diversification and the Resource Curse: An Econometric Analysis of GCC Countries. Economies, 12(11), 287. [CrossRef]
- Acheampong, A. O., Opoku, E. E. O., Amankwaa, A., & Dzator, J. (2024). Energy poverty and gender equality in education: Unpacking the transmission channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 202, 123274. [CrossRef]
- Allen, E., Lyons, H., & Stephens, J. C. (2019). Women’s leadership in renewable transformation, energy justice and energy democracy: Redistributing power. Energy Research & Social Science, 57, 101233.[CrossRef]
- Ang, T. Z., Salem, M., Kamarol, M., Das, H. S., Nazari, M. A., & Prabaharan, N. (2022). A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources: Classifications, challenges and suggestions. Energy strategy reviews, 43, 100939. [CrossRef]
- Bakhsh, S., Zhang, W., Ali, K., & Oláh, J. (2024). Strategy towards sustainable energy transition: The effect of environmental governance, economic complexity and geopolitics. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101330. [CrossRef]
- Baruah, B. (2017, February). Renewable inequity? Women's employment in clean energy in industrialized, emerging and developing economies. In Natural resources forum, 41(1), 18-29. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Belaïd, F. (2022). Implications of poorly designed climate policy on energy poverty: Global reflections on the current surge in energy prices. Energy Research & Social Science, 92, 102790. [CrossRef]
- Bryan, E., Alvi, M., Huyer, S., & Ringler, C. (2024). Addressing gender inequalities and strengthening women's agency to create more climate-resilient and sustainable food systems. Global Food Security, 40, 100731. [CrossRef]
- Caiafa, C., Hattori, T., Nam, H., & de Coninck, H. (2023). International technology innovation to accelerate energy transitions: The case of the international energy agency technology collaboration programmes. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 48, 100766.[CrossRef]
- Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421. [CrossRef]