Çin'in Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi: Küresel Ulaştırma Operasyonlarında Denizcilik ve Deniz Mühendisliği Perspektifinden Stratejik Karar Alma Motivasyonları

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 95 - 117, 01.06.2025

Mehmet Serdar Çelık , Bulut Ozan Ceylan , Demir Ali Akyar

https://doi.org/10.52998/trjmms.1555195

Abstract

Çin'in 2013 yılında duyurduğu Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (BRI), küresel ulaşım altyapısını geliştirmek ve ekonomik kalkınmayı teşvik etmek amacıyla tasarlanmış dev bir projedir. Bu çalışma, Çin'in BRI'sini yönlendiren ana motivasyonel kaynakları, özellikle ekonomik, politik ve stratejik unsurlar açısından tanımlamayı ve önceliklendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. PRISMA sistematik literatür taraması ve odak grup metotları kullanılarak, 26 motivasyonel faktör belirlenmiş olup, bunların 16'sı esas olarak ekonomik niteliktedir. Bu faktörler arasında 'Çinli yatırımcılar için yeni iş fırsatları' en önemli itici güç olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ekonomik motivasyonlara ek olarak, bu çalışma, BRI'nin deniz yollarının başarısında deniz mühendisliği, gemi risk yönetimi ve gemi makineleri inovasyonlarının operasyonel etkinliğini sağlamak için hayati bir unsur olarak tanımlanmıştır. Çalışma ayrıca, Çin'in daha geniş jeopolitik ve ekonomik hedeflerine ulaşmasında deniz güvenliği protokolleri, altyapı modernizasyonu ve risk azaltma stratejilerinin rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Bulgularımız, özellikle ekonomik büyüme ve deniz taşımacılığı altyapısına yönelik olan Çin'in iç motivasyonlarının dış faktörlerden daha önemli bir rol oynadığını göstermektedir. Bu durum, politika yapıcılar, deniz mühendisleri ve ulaştırma operatörlerinin, uzun vadeli stratejilerini Çin'in hedefleriyle uyumlu hale getirmeleri gerektiğini, deniz güvenliği, operasyonel verimlilik ve Çin'in deniz teknolojilerinin küresel rekabet gücüne odaklanmaları gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışmadan elde edilen bilgiler, BRI kapsamında deniz altyapısının küresel ulaştırma sistemlerinin geleceğini şekillendirmedeki stratejik önemine daha derin bir anlayış kazandırmaktadır.

Keywords

Deniz Taşımacılığı , Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi , ANP , PRISMA , Deniz Mühendisliği

China's Belt and Road Initiative: Motivations for Strategic Decision-Making in Global Transport Operations from a Maritime and Marine Engineering Perspective

Abstract

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), announced in 2013, is a mega project designed to enhance global transportation infrastructure and stimulate economic development. This study aims to identify and prioritize the key motivational sources driving China's BRI, with a particular focus on economic, political, and strategic considerations. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) systematic literature review and focus group methods, we identified 26 motivational factors, 16 of which are primarily economic in nature. Among these, 'New business opportunities for Chinese investors' emerged as the most significant driver. In addition to economic motivations, this study highlights the critical importance of marine engineering, ship risk management, and ship machinery innovations in the success of BRI's maritime routes. Safe, efficient maritime transportation is identified as a crucial element for ensuring the operational effectiveness of the Maritime Silk Road. The study further emphasizes the role of maritime safety protocols, infrastructure modernization, and risk mitigation strategies in achieving China's broader geopolitical and economic ambitions through the BRI. Our findings suggest that China’s internal motivations, particularly those related to economic growth and maritime transport infrastructure, play a more prominent role than external factors. This underscores the need for policymakers, marine engineers, and transport operators to align their long-term strategies with China’s ambitions, focusing on maritime safety, operational efficiency, and the global competitiveness of China’s maritime technologies. The insights gained from this study contribute to a deeper understanding of the strategic importance of maritime infrastructure in shaping the future of global transportation systems under the BRI.

Keywords

Marine Transportation , Belt and Road Initiative , ANP , PRISMA , Marine Engineering

Ethical Statement

Author(s) declare that this study was conducted in accordance with ethics committee procedures of human or animal experiments.

Supporting Institution

No funding was received from institutions or agencies for the execution of this research.

References

• Andrews, K. R., & Andrews, K. R. (1980). The concept of corporate strategy.
• Barbosa, M., Castañeda-Ayarza, J. A., Ferreira, D. H. L. (2020). Sustainable strategic management (GES): Sustainability in small business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258: 120880.
• Bakhsh, S., Yin, H., Shabir, M., Ali, K. (2022). China trade with belt and road countries: the role and impact of institutions. China Economic Journal, 15(1): 29-48.
• Blah, M. (2018). China’s belt and road initiative and India’s concerns. Strategic Analysis, 42(4): 313-332.
• Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Trends and uses of focus groups. Focus groups in social research, 1: 1-18.
• Boyd, B.K., Bergh, D.D., Ireland, R.D., Ketchen Jr, D.J. (2013). Constructs in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 3-14.
• Callaghan, M., Hubbard, P. (2016). The Asian infrastructure investment bank: Multilateralism on the silk road. China Economic Journal, 9(2): 116-139.
• Carspecken, P., Dennis, B. (2012). Qualitative research: A reader in philosophy, core concepts, and practice. L. Carspecken (Ed.). Lang, Peter New York.
• Chan, S. (2017). The belt and road initiative: Implications for China and East Asian economies. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 35(2): 52-78.
• Chandler Jr, A. D. (1969). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise (Vol. 120). MIT press.
• Chen, Y., Fan, Z., Zhang, J., & Mo, M. (2019). Does the connectivity of the Belt and Road Initiative contribute to the economic growth of the Belt and Road countries?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(14): 3227-3240.
• Chen, Y., Jin, Q., Fang, H., Lei, H., Hu, J., Wu, Y., ... & Wan, Y. (2019). Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235: 1276-1294.
• Cheng, L. K. (2016). Three questions on China's “belt and road initiative”. China Economic Review, 40: 309-313.
• Cheng, Z. (2020). Building the belt and road initiative?–practices en route. The Pacific Review, 33(5): 788-812.
• Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., Klemeš, J. J., Moosavi, S. M. S., Davoudi, M., & Zeinalnezhad, M. (2021). Covid-19 shock: Development of strategic management framework for global energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 139: 110643.
• Cieślik, E. (2020). Does China use its trade potential in the Belt and Road Initiative properly? The relations between Chinese value added and trade potential in the European countries: bottom-up analysis. China Economic Journal, 13(3): 339-363.
• Clarke, M. (2018). The belt and road initiative: Exploring Beijing’s motivations and challenges for its new silk road. Strategic Analysis: 42(2), 84-102.
• Dai, Z., & Zhu, H. (2022). Time-varying spillover effects and investment strategies between WTI crude oil, natural gas and Chinese stock markets related to belt and road initiative. Energy Economics, 108: 105883.
• De Fátima Teles, M., & de Sousa, J. F. (2017). A general morphological analysis to support strategic management decisions in public transport companies. Transportation Research Procedia, 22: 509-518
• De Soyres, F., Mulabdic, A., Murray, S., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2019). How much will the Belt and Road Initiative reduce trade costs?. International Economics, 159: 151-164.
• Deng, Y. (2021). How China builds the credibility of the belt and road initiative. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(131): 734-750.
• Dichabeng, P., Merat, N., & Markkula, G. (2021). Factors that influence the acceptance of future shared automated vehicles–A focus group study with United Kingdom drivers. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 82: 121-140.
• Du, H. B. (2010). Risk assessment model for air traffic control based on Fuzzy-ANP method. Zhongguo Anquan Kexue Xuebao, 20(12): 79-85.
• Drysdale, P., & Armstrong, S. (2021). RCEP: a strategic opportunity for multilateralism. China Economic Journal, 14(2): 128-143.
• Eichengreen, B., & Lombardi, D. (2017). RMBI or RMBR? Is the Renminbi Destined to become a Global or Regional Currency?. Asian Economic Papers, 16(1): 35-59.
• Elia, J. A., Li, J., & Floudas, C. A. (2015). Strategic planning optimization for natural gas to liquid transportation fuel (GTL) systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 72: 109-125.
• Elrahman, O. A., & Al, J. A. (2017). Strategic management of global alliances in transportation research & development. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(1): 1-2.
• ERU (Eurasian Research Institute). 2022. China’s the Belt and Road Risk Assessment Issue. https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/chinas-the-belt-and-road-risk-assessment-issue/ is retrieved
• Fern, E. F., & Fern, E. E. (2001). Advanced focus group research. Sage.
• Flint, C., & Zhu, C. (2019). The geopolitics of connectivity, cooperation, and hegemonic competition: The Belt and Road Initiative. Geoforum, 99: 95-101.
• Frost, A. D., Hróbjartsson, A., & Nejstgaard, C. H. (2022). Adherence to the PRISMA-P 2015 reporting guideline was inadequate in systematic review protocols. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
• GFD (Green Finance & Development Center), 2022 Green Finance & Development Center (GFD) Countries of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), (2022) https://greenfdc.org/countries-of-the-belt-and-road-initiative-bri. is retrieved
• Gibcus, P., & Kemp, R. G. M. (2003). Strategy and small firm performance (pp. 1-75). EIM Business & Policy Research.
• Hafeez, M., Chunhui, Y., Strohmaier, D., Ahmed, M., Jie, L. (2018). Does finance affect environmental degradation: evidence from One Belt and One Road Initiative region?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(10): 9579-9592.
• Haider, J., Pettit, S. J., Harris, I., Beresford, A.K.C., Shi, Y. (2021). Economic and environmental impacts of alternative routing scenarios in the context of China's belt and road initiative. Maritime Transport Research, 2: 100030.
• Han, Y., Pang, X., Zhang, X., Han, R., & Liang, Z. (2022). Resource sustainability and challenges: Status and competitiveness of international trade in licorice extracts under the Belt and Road Initiative. Global Ecology and Conservation, 34: e02014.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2002). Administração estratégica. São Paulo: Pioneira Thomson Learning.
• Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
• Hsu, C. C., & Chien, F. (2022). The study of co-movement risk in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80: 1130-1152.
• Huang, D., Loughney, S., & Wang, J. (2021). Identification of China’s strategic transport passages in the context of the belt and road initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 1-26.
• Huang, Y. (2016). Understanding China's Belt & Road initiative: motivation, framework and assessment. China Economic Review, 40: 314-321.
• Huang, Y. (2018). Proactively and steadily advancing China’s financial opening. China Economic Journal, 11(1): 1-13.
• Innocenti, T., Feller, D., Giagio, S., Salvioli, S., Minnucci, S., Brindisino, F., ... & Ostelo, R. (2022). Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study. Brazilian journal of physical therapy: 100450.
• Kalanlar, B. (2021). A PRISMA-driven systematic review for determination of earthquake and nursing studies. International Emergency Nursing, 59: 101095.
• Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2013). Focus groups. London: Routledge.
• Kang, L., Peng, F., Zhu, Y., & Pan, A. (2018). Harmony in diversity: can the one belt one road initiative promote China’s outward foreign direct investment?. Sustainability, 10(9): 3264.
• Kazemi, Y., Szmerekovsky, J. (2015). Modeling downstream petroleum supply chain: The importance of multi-mode transportation to strategic planning. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 83: 111-125.
• Kim, W., Kim, J. H., Cha, Y. K., Chong, S., & Kim, T. J. (2022). Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) of Radiological Articles Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline. Academic Radiology.
• Kong, Q., Chen, A., Shen, C., & Wong, Z. (2021). Has the Belt and Road Initiative improved the quality of economic growth in China's cities?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 76: 870-883.
• Koseoglu, M. A., Wong, A. K. F., Kim, S. S., & Song, S. Y. (2022). Tracing knowledge creation and dissemination of strategic management research in hospitality scholarship from 1960 to 2020. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 104: 103247.
• Laurenceson, J., Bretherton, H., Burke, P. F., & Wei, E. (2019). Chinese investment in Australian infrastructure assets: accounting for local public preferences. China Economic Journal, 12(1): 77-92.
• Li, W., Qiao, Y., Li, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Energy consumption, pollution haven hypothesis, and environmental Kuznets curve: examining the environment–economy link in belt and road initiative countries. Energy, 239, 122559.
• Lin, W. (2019). Transport geography and geopolitics: Visions, rules and militarism in China's Belt and Road Initiative and beyond. Journal of Transport Geography, 81: 102436.
• Mu, E., Cooper, O., & Peasley, M. (2020). Best practices in analytic network process studies. Expert Systems with Applications, 159: 113536.
• Murcia, N. N., Ferreira, F. A., & Ferreira, J. J. (2022). Enhancing strategic management using a “quantified VRIO”: Adding value with the MCDA approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174: 121251.
• Nugent, J. B., & Lu, J. (2021). China's outward foreign direct investment in the Belt and Road Initiative: What are the motives for Chinese firms to invest?. China Economic Review, 68: 101628.
• Olamade, O. O., Oyebisi, T. O., Egbetokun, A. A., & Adebowale, B. (2011). Environmental scanning strategy of manufacturing companies in southwestern Nigeria. Technology analysis & strategic management, 23(4): 367-381.
• Ortiz-Martínez, V. M., Andreo-Martinez, P., Garcia-Martinez, N., de los Ríos, A. P., Hernández-Fernández, F. J., & Quesada-Medina, J. (2019). Approach to biodiesel production from microalgae under supercritical conditions by the PRISMA method. Fuel processing technology, 191: 211-222.
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews, 10(1): 1-11.
• Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Z., & Du, D. (2022). Evolution of freight spatial pattern of China's coastal ports facing the Polar Silk Road. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100900.
• Rehman, F. U., & Noman, A. A. (2021). Trade related sectorial infrastructure and exports of belt and road countries: does belt and road initiatives make this relation structurally instable?. China Economic Journal, 14(3): 350-374.
• Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence.
• Rolland, N. (2017). China's “Belt and Road Initiative”: Underwhelming or game-changer?. The Washington Quarterly, 40(1): 127-142.
• Saaty, T. L. (2005). Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks. RWS publications.
• Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process (Vol. 282). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
• Sharma, A. (2019). An analysis of ‘belt and road’initiative and the Middle East. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 13(1): 35-49.
• Simon, H. A. (2013). Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster.
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice (Vol. 20). Sage publications.
• Sun, C. L., & Bi, R. (2008). Application of fuzzy ANP in assessing knowledge management performance. In 2008 International Seminar on Business and Information Management (Vol. 2, pp. 67-70). IEEE.
• Taylor, F. W. (2004). Scientific management. Routledge.
• Wan, X., Liu, X., Du, Z., & Du, Y. (2021). A novel model used for assessing supply chain sustainability integrating the ANP and ER approaches and its application in marine ranching. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279: 123500.
• Wang, B., & Lin, P. (2022). Whether China's overseas energy infrastructure projects dirtier or cleaner after the belt and road initiative?. Energy Policy, 166: 113007.
• Wang, Y. G., & Wang, C. M. (2013). Analysis of the influential factors on the airline safety performance based on ISM and ANP. Journal of Safety and Environment, 13(4): 221-226.
• Williams, S., Clausen, M. G., Robertson, A., Peacock, S., & McPherson, K. (2012). Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4): 368-383.
• Wu, X., & Si, Y. (2022). China's Belt and Road Initiative and Corporate Innovation. Finance Research Letters, 103052.
• Wu, Y., Shi, X., & Hu, C. (2021). Per capita CO2 emissions divergence influenced by bilateral trade with china under the belt and road initiative. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 1589-1601.
• Yu, L., Zhao, D., Niu, H., & Lu, F. (2020). Does the belt and road initiative expand China's export potential to countries along the belt and road?. China Economic Review, 60: 101419.
• Yu, S., Qian, X., & Liu, T. (2019). Belt and road initiative and Chinese firms' outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review, 41: 100629.