Research Article

A Protest Against Human Domination over Nature in Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael

Volume: 15 Number: 29 January 30, 2025
TR EN

A Protest Against Human Domination over Nature in Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael

Abstract

Daniel Quinn’s 1992 novel Ishmael has initiated a profound re-examination of our connection with the natural world and has challenged the prevalent view of human supremacy. This research examines the pivotal insights and themes expounded in Ishmael, shedding light on their implications for our understanding of our position within the ecological community. At the heart of the novel lies Ishmael, a wise gorilla who assumes the role of an unconventional teacher on deeply established convictions about human superiority and the unchecked exploitation of Earth’s resources. Ishmael’s teachings underscore the complex interdependence of all life forms and emphasize the pressing need to listen to the voices of fellow forms in the tapestry of life. This study endeavors to explore the concept of human supremacy, examining its origins and the transformative potential inherent in embracing a more inclusive perspective regarding our bond with nature. It analyses the historical, religious, and cultural factors that have preserved human dominance and the resulting detrimental actions toward the environment generated by these beliefs. Eventually, this research concludes that Ishmael’s message remains relevant and urgent, beckoning us to critically evaluate our values, behaviors, and assumptions. It implores us to actively engage in reshaping our world by challenging prevailing narratives, interrogating societal structures, and adopting sustainable practices.

Keywords

Daniel Quinn , Ishmael , nature , environment , human supremacy

References

  1. BACON, F. (1964). The masculine birth of time, or the great instauration of the dominion of man over the universe. In F. Bacon, The Philosophy of Francis Bacon: An Essay on its Development from 1603 to 1609, (pp. 59-62). Liverpool University Press.
  2. CONKLIN, A. L. (1998). Colonialism and Human Rights, A Contradiction in Terms? The Case of France and West Africa, 1895-1914. The American Historical Review, 103(2), pp. 419-442.
  3. DESCARTES, R. (2003 [1637]) Discourse on Method and Meditations. Dover Publications, Joe.
  4. DESROCHERS, P. (2022, April 4). From Prometheus to Arcadia: Human Supremacy, Carrying Capacity and Ecological Footprints. Retrieved from Econlib: https://www.econlib.org/library/columns/y2022/ desrochersprometheus.html
  5. Genesis 1:27. (2023, 07 11). Retrieved from Bibleref.com: https://www.bibleref.com/Genesis/1/Genesis-1-27.html
  6. GLOTFELTY, C. (1996). Introduction: Literary Studies in an Age of Environmental Crisis. In C. Glotfelty & H. Fromm (Eds.), The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, pp. 1-17. The University of Georgia Press.
  7. GORALNİK, L., & NESLON, M. (2012). Anthropocentrism: What is it? Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition). (R. Chadwick, Ed.) New York: Elsevier Inc.
  8. KARMAKAR, G., & CHETTY, R. (2023). Episteme and Ecology: Amitav Ghosh’s The Living Mountain and the Decolonial Turn. South Asian Review, 45(3), pp. 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2023.2206307
  9. KEONG, C. Y. (2018, April). Nurturing a Sustainable Earth System in the Age of Science and Technology: From Francis Bacon’s Conquest of Nature to Albert Schweitzer’s Ethics of Reverence for Life. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 9(4), pp. 110-114.
  10. KERRIDGE, R. (1998). Introduction. In Kerridge, R. and Sammells, N. (Eds) Writing the Environment, pp. 1-9. London: Zed Books.
APA
Bay, S., & Karagöz, C. (2025). A Protest Against Human Domination over Nature in Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael. Trakya Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(29), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.33207/trkede.1472073