Medya ve Şiddet: Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz

Öz

Medya araştırmalarının şiddet temalı içeriklere ilgisi 1900’lerin ortasında belirmiştir. Şiddet olgusu geleneksel medya bağlamında olduğu kadar yeni medya çerçevesinde de bilimsel araştırmaların gündemine yerleşmeyi başarmıştır. Buna karşılık söz konusu alan hakkında genel durum raporu sunup kazanım ya da eksik tespitinde bulunarak sonraki araştırmalara yön tayin etme potansiyeli bulunan çalışmalara bugün hala ihtiyaç olduğu açıktır. Alanyazında gözlenen boşluğu doldurmaya aday bu çalışma, medya araştırmalarının ortaya çıktığı erken dönem yaklaşımlarından bugüne bilimsel metinlerin odağına yerleşen medya ve şiddet ilişkisinin son dönem görme biçimlerine hangi sınırlar çerçevesinde yansıdığını görme/gösterme çabasıdır. Bahse konu soruna dikkat çeken araştırmalar arasında olma fırsatı yakalayan bu çalışma hem literatürü bütüncül olarak betimleme hem yoğun dikkati hak eden alanları işaretleme gücü dolayısıyla alanyazına küçük olduğu kadar kayda değer bir katkı olmayı amaçlamaktadır. Nicel karaktere sahip çalışmada bibliyometrik analizden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları 2000’li yılların başından itibaren konuya eğilimin düzenli biçimde arttığını; bilimsel yayınların mevcut ilgisinin şiddet yoğun mekanlar olarak öne çıkan yeni medyaya kaydığını; 2020 itibarıyla Covid-19, pandemi, halk sağlığı, sosyal medya ve aile içi şiddet anahtar kelimelerinin yoğunlaştığını; Türkiye’de farklı görme biçimlerine yaslı etki düzeyi yüksek yayınlara ihtiyaç olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak medya ve şiddet temalı yerli literatürün gelişimine katkı sunacak nitelikli yayın üretimi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Medya
• Şiddet
• Medyada Şiddetin Temsili
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• İletişim Çalışmaları

Media and Violence: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

Media research’s interest in violent content emerged in the mid-1900s. The phenomenon of violence has managed to be on the agenda of scientific research both within the scope of traditional media and new media. On the other hand, it is clear that there is still a need today for studies that have the potential to provide a general status report on the field in question and determine the achievements or deficiencies and give direction of future research. This study, which focuses on filling the gap observed in the literature, is an effort to see/show how the relationship between media and violence, which has become the focus of scientific texts since the early approaches of media research, is reflected in recent ways of seeing. The study, which has the opportunity to be among the studies that draw attention to the problem in question, aims to be a small yet significant contribution to the literature due to its power to describe the literature holistically and to mark areas that deserve intense attention. Bibliometric analysis was used in this quantitative study. Although research findings have shown that the trend towards the issue has increased steadily since the early 2000s, the current interest of scientific publications has shifted to new media that stand out as places with intense violence, and when it comes to 2020, the keywords Covid-19, pandemic, public health, social media and domestic violence have increased so that there is a need for high-impact publications based on different ways of seeing in Türkiye. As a result, qualified publication production that will contribute to the development of domestic literature on the theme of media and violence is recommended.

Keywords

• Media
• Violence
• Violence in Media Representation
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Communication Studies

References

1. Altheide, D. L. (1997). The news media, the problem frame, and the production of fear. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(4), 647-668.
2. Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., Malamuth, N. M., & Wartella, E. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(3), 81-110.
3. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353-359.
4. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
5. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2018). Media violence and the General Aggression Model. Journal of Social Issues, 74(2), 386-413.
6. Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihori, N., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin, 136(2), 151-173.
7. Artino, A. R. (2007). Bandura, Ross, and Ross: Observational learning and the Bobo Doll. Online submission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed499095
8. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs.

9. Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3-11.
10. Bartholow, B. D., Bushman, B. J., & Sestir, M. A. (2006). Chronic violent video game exposure and desensitization to violence: Behavioral and event-related brain potential data. Journal of experimental social psychology, 42(4), 532-539.
11. Bordons, M., Morillo, F., & Gómez, I. (2005). Analysis of cross-disciplinary research through bibliometric tools. Içinde H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (ss. 437-456). Springer.
12. Boyatzis, C. J., Matillo, G. M., & Nesbitt, K. M. (1995). Effects of the "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" on children’s aggression with peers. Child Study Journal, 25(1), 45-55.
13. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the General Aggression Model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679-1686.
14. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2015). Understanding causality in the effects of media violence. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(14), 1807-1821.
15. Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 160(4), 348-352.
16. Cai, H., Sha, S., Zhang, Q., Si, T. L., Liu, Y., Zheng, W., Su, Z., Cheung, T., Ungvari, G. S., Teo, A. R., Kato, T. A., Ng, C. H., & Xiang, Y. (2023). Hikikomori: A perspective from bibliometric analysis. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 77(10), 541-549.
17. Cantor, J. (2000). Media violence. Journal of adolescent health, 27(2), 30-34.
18. Cline, V. B., Croft, R. G., & Courrier, S. (1973). Desensitization of children to television violence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 27(3), 360-365.
19. Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., & Nelson, D. A. (2012). Two sides to the same coin: Relational and physical aggression in the media. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 4(4), 186-201.
20. Eysenck, H. J., & Nias, D. K. (1978). Sex, violence, and the media. Temple Smith.
21. Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Does media violence predict societal violence? It depends on what you look at and when. Journal of Communication, 65(1), E1-E22.
22. Gerbner, G. (2018). The hidden side of television violence. İçinde Invisible Crises (ss. 27-34). Routledge.
23. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile number 11. Journal of communication, 30(3), 10-29.
24. Griffiths, M. D., & Shuckford, G. L. (1989). Desensitization to television violence: A new model. New ideas in psychology, 7(1), 85-89.
25. Harju, A. A., & Kotilainen, N. (2023). Encounters between violence and media| Encounters between violence and media—Introduction. International Journal of Communication, 17(10), 1269-1278.
26. Huesmann, L. R., & Taylor, L. D. (2006). The role of media violence in violent behavior. Annual Review of Public Health, 27(1), 393-415.
27. Jamieson, P. E., & Romer, D. (2014). Violence in popular US prime time TV dramas and the cultivation of fear: A time series analysis. Media and Communication, 2(2), 31-41.
28. Lazarides, M. K., Lazaridou, I.-Z., & Papanas, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis: Bridging informatics with science. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231153538
29. Leeuwen, T. van. (2005). Descriptive versus evaluative bibliometrics. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (ss. 373-388). Springer.
30. Miller, T. (2009). Television studies: The basics. Routledge.
31. Murray, J. P. (2008). Media violence: The effects are both real and strong. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(8), 1212-1230.
32. Özer, Ö. (2017). Medyada şiddet kullanımı: Şiddet ekonomisi, medyanın ideolojik şiddeti ve yetiştirme kuramı açısından bir değerlendirme. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 27, 1-19.
33. Tannenbaum, P. H., & Zillmann, D. (1975). Emotional arousal in the facilitation of aggression through communication. İçinde Advances in experimental social psychology (C. 8, ss. 149-192). Elsevier.
34. Wilson, B. J., Smith, S. L., Potter, W. J., Kunkel, D., Linz, D., Colvin, C. M., & Donnerstein, E. (2002). Violence in children’s television programming: Assessing the risks. Journal of Communication, 52(1), 5-35.