Investigation of the Effects of Recreational Football on Some Functional Movement Skills in Older Men

Year 2023, , 446 - 454, 31.12.2023

Cemal Polat , Alparslan Ünveren

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.1325294

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of recreational football on functional movement skill (FMST) levels of elderly men. 57 (65.05 ± 2.5) elderly men who participated in the study were randomly divided into the football group (FG, n= 28) and the control group (CG, n= 29). Data were collected with the FHTT scale and investigeted via mixed design ANOVA. The data were analyzed considering the significance level of p<.05. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the deep squatting movement (p>.096), and there was a statistical difference between the times (p<.002). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups, between times and group*time interaction at high stepping, respectively (p<.008, p<.001, p<.035). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups in a single-line move and in group*time interaction, respectively (p<.008, p<.006). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in shoulder mobility (p<.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the times and in the group*time interaction, respectively (p>.98, p>.44). Statistically significant differences were observed between groups, between times and in group*time interaction in active straight leg raising, respectively (p<.004, p<.001, p<.035). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in trunk stability movement (p>.089). There was a statistically significant difference between the times and in the group*time interaction (p<.024). Statistically significant difference was observed between groups and between times in rotational stability movement, respectively (p<.001, p<.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the groups*time interaction (p>.065). Statistically significant differences were observed in FHTT total scores between groups, between times and in the interaction of groups*time, respectively (p<.001, p<.001, p<.001, p<.001). The results show that recreational football is effective on FHTT and is a powerful exercise option in improving mobility, which is important for elderly individuals to maintain their quality of life.

Keywords

elderly, recreational football, functional Movement

References

• 1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc, 1988: 274–27
• 2. Cook G, Burton L, Kiesel K, Rose G, Brynt MF. Movement: Functional movement systems. Aptos, CA: On Target Publication, 2010.
• 3. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ & Voight M. Functional Movement Screening: The Use of Fundamental Movements as an Assessment of Function (Part 1). The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 2014; 9(3): 400-401.
• 4. Çambel O. A. Sedanter kadınlarda uygulanan 8 haftalık farklı fitness egzersizlerinin FMS skoru ve seçilmiş motorik özellikler üzerine etkisi (Master's thesis, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü), 2012.
• 5. Farrell S W, Pavlovic A, Barlow C. E, Leonard D, DeFina J. R, Willis B. L, ... & Haskell W. L. (2021). Functional movement screening performance and association with key health markers in older adults. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 35(11): 3021-3027.
• 6. Fawcett M. A. Reliability of the functional movement screen scores for older adults. (A Thesis, Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University), 2014.
• 7. Followay B. N, Reierson H. A, & Rigden E. M. Sex Differences and Physical Activity Status on the Hamstring: Quadriceps Ratio, Activities of Daily Living, and Functional Movement in Older Adults. International Journal of Exercise Science, 2023;16(4): 1228-1243.
• 8. Groessl EJ, Kaplan RM, Rejeski WJ, Katula JA. Health-related quality of life in older adults at risk for disability. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007; 33 (3): 214-218.
• 9. Hermosa D M, Montalvo S, Gonzalez M. P, & Dorgo, S. Physical fitness in older adults: Is there a relationship with the modified Functional Movement Screen™. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2021; (25): 28-34.
• 10. Matteson M A, Linton AD, & Barnes SJ. Cognitive developmental approach to dementia. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1996; 28(3): 233-240.
• 11. Mitchell UH, Johnson AW, Vehrs PR, Feland JB & Hilton SC. Performance on the Functional Movement Screen in older active adults. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2016; 5(1): 119-125.
• 12. Ministry of Health. Turkey physical activity guide. Ministry of Health Publication No: 940. 2014; (2): 4. Edition: Kuban Matbaacılık Publishing. Ankara.
• 13. Moschny A, Platen P, Klaaßen-Mielke R, Trampisch U, & Hinrichs, T. (2011). Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, (8): 1-10.
• 14. Onate J A, Dewey T, Kollock RO, Thomas KS, Van Lunen BL, DeMaio M., & Ringleb, SI. Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2012; 26(2): 408-415.
• 15. Perry FT & Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle- aged adults. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2013; 27(2): 458-462.
• 16. Rasinaho M, Hirvensalo M, Leinonen R, Lintunen T, & Rantanen T. (2007). Motives for and barriers to physical activity among older adults with mobility limitations. Journal of aging and physical activity, 15(1): 90-102.
• 17. Schober P, Boer C & Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2018; 126(5): 1763-1768.
• 18. World Health Organization. What are the key concepts? Global Strategy and Action Plan on Ageing and Health (2016-2020). World Health Organization. 2016; 4.
• 19. World Health Organization. Key fact. Physical Activity. 2020. Available at: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity.