-

Abstract

With this study; it was aimed to obtain multi-dimensional evaluation of body-self perception levels of sedentary individuals aged over 30 who attended fitness center classes. The population of the study was consisted of fitness centers located in Hatay Province. The sample was composed of 80 sedentary individuals (38 men and 42 women) who attended the selected fitness centers with random sampling. All of the subjects were included in the study with voluntariness principle. Pre-test and posttest method was used in order to conduct a more illustrative study. In the study; a personal information form designed by the researcher and "The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire” which was designed by Winstead and Cash and Turkish adaptation and new form of which was made by Dogan and Dogan were administered to the subjects. Means, standard deviations of all the data were calculated. Comparisons of pre-test and post-test scores of the subjects were made with Paired Samples t – test. It was checked whether or not the results were significant at 0.05 level and 0.01 level. As a result; there was significant difference in terms of gender whereas no difference existed in terms of age, economic status and educational status. Again; when pre-test and post-test scores with regard to the subscales of “The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire” were compared no significant difference was found

Keywords

• Body perception, sedentary, self-respect

Evaluation of body-self-perception of sedentary individuals aged over 30 who attended fitness center classes

Abstract

With this study; it was aimed to obtain multi-dimensional evaluation of body-self perception levels of sedentary individuals aged over 30 who attended fitness center classes. The population of the study was consisted of fitness centers located inHatayProvince. The sample was composed of 80 sedentary individuals (38 men and 42 women) who attended the selected fitness centers with random sampling. All of the subjects were included in the study with voluntariness principle. Pre-test and post-test method was used in order to conduct a more illustrative study. In the study; a personal information form designed by the researcher and "The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire” which was designed by Winstead and Cash and Turkish adaptation and new form of which was made by Dogan and Dogan were administered to the subjects. Means, standard deviations of all the data were calculated. Comparisons of pre-test and post-test scores of the subjects were made with Paired Samples t – test. It was checked whether or not the results were significant at 0.05 level and 0.01 level. As a result; there was significant difference in terms of gender whereas no difference existed in terms of age, economic status and educational status. Again; when pre-test and post-test scores with regard to the subscales of “The Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire” were compared no significant difference was found. 

Keywords

• Body perception, sedentary, self-respect.

References

1. Aşcı HF. Sense of self and exercises. Hacettepe J of Sport Sciences, 2004; 15(4): 233-266.
2. Baştuğ G, Kuru E. Bayan sporcuların bedenlerini algılama düzeyleri ve cinsiyet rolleri üzerine bir araştırma, Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2009; 29(2): 533- 555.
3. Çelik VO, Yılmaz İ, Solmaz AR, Yalız D. Kurum içi spor etkinliklerine katılan bayan ve erkek üniversite öğrencilerinin vücut imajı algıları arasındaki farlılık üzerine bir araştırma (Anadolu Üniversitesi örneği). 9. Uluslar arası Spor Bilimleri Kongresi, 2006; 1159, Muğla.
4. Chrzanowski G. The genesis and nature of self-esteem. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 1981; 35(1): 143-151.
5. Cüceloğlu D. İnsan ve Davranışı 7 Baskı. Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1997.
6. Doğan O, Doğan S. Çok Yönlü Vücut imajı İlişkileri Ölçeği El Kitabı. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Yayınları, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Basımevi, Sivas, 1992.
7. Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire. Obes Res, 2000; 8(4): 160-170.
8. Duncan MJ, Al-Nakeeb Y. Body image and physical activity in British secondary school children. Euro Phys Educ Rev, 2004; 10: 243-60.

9. Güçlü M, Yentür J. Milli takım düzeyindeki elit bayan sporcuların kişisel ve sosyal uyum düzeyleri ile bedenlerini algılama düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2008; 4(2): 183-192.
10. Hamer M, Stamatakis E. Physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease events: Inflammatory and metabolic mechanisms. Medicine Exercise, 2009; 41(6): 1206–1211. Science in Sports and
11. İkizler C, Karagözoğlu C. Psychology of Success in Sports. Alfa Publication, Istanbul.1997.
12. Karakoç Ö. Investigation of self-esteem levels of hearing impaired national players and of hearing impaired individuals who did not play sports, Fırat University, Health Sciences Institute Health Sciences Institute, Department of Physical Education and Sports Physical Education and Sports, Master Degree Thesis, Elazığ. 2010.
13. Karasar N. Scientific Research Methods. Nobel Publications, Ankara, 2005.
14. Kulaksızoğlu A. Adolescence Psychology. 7 Edition, Remzi Publication, Istanbul, 2005.
15. Li-Jung C, Kenneth RF, Anne MH, Po-Wen K. Correlates of body dissatisfaction among Taiwanese adolescents. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2010; 19(2): 172-179.
16. Loland NW. Body image and physical activity, a survey among Norwegian men and female. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1998; 29: 339-365.
17. Martin KA, Sinden AR, Fleming JC. Inactivity may be hazardous to your image, the effects of exercise participation on impression formation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2000; 22(3): 283-291.
18. Mikkila V, Lahti-Koski M, Pietinen P. Virtanen SM, Rimpela M. Associates of obesity and weight dissatisfaction among Finnish adolescents. Public Health Nutr, 2003; 6(1): 49-56.
19. Otaibi AL H. Nassef S, Raouf T. Body shape dissatisfaction, weight status and physical activity among a sample university students in Saudi Arabia. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2013; 4: 616-625.
20. Öztürk KF. Adana ili orta öğretimde sportif katılımın, benlik saygısı üzerine etkisi. Eğitim Kurumlarında Beden Eğitimi ve Spor II. Ulusal Sempozyumunu, 16-18 Aralık 1993; Manisa.
21. Patrick H, Neighbors CT, Knee CR. Social comparison and body image: the role of contingent self-esteem and self- perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2004; 30(3): 501-514.
22. Pınar R. Depression, self-esteem and body image among the obese: a comparative study. C U Nursing School Journal, 2002; 6(1): 30-41.
23. Richman EL, Shaffer DR. If you let me play sport: how might female sports participation influence the self-esteem of adolescent females. Psychology of female Quarterly, 2000; 24:189-199.
24. Sung RYT, Yu CW, Yani RCH, Lam PKW, Hau KT. Self- perception of physical competences in preadolescent overweight chinese children. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2004; 59(2): 101–106.
25. Tiggemann M, Williamson S. The effect of exercise on body satisfaction and self-esteem as a function of gender and age. Sex Roles, 2000; 43(2): 119-27.
26. Tritshler K. Practical measurement and Assessment. Liponcott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000; 409-421
27. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 1992; 30(6): 473–483.
28. Winstead BA, Cash TE. Reliability and validity of the body self-relations questionnaire: a new measure of body im-age. Paper Association Convention, New Orleans, LA. 1984: March. Psychological
29. Yentür J. Milli takım düzeyindeki elit bayan sporcuların bedenlerini kişilik karşılaştırılması, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi algılama düzeylerinin
30. athletes. VII. International Sport Sciences Congress, Antalya, Turkey, 2002; 181.