-

Abstract

One of the most discussed topics in recent years is the question of globalization or nationalization (regionalization). In other words, strong capital dominated policy and modernizing technology, religion, and national identity, tradition, protection of cultural and linguistic differences on the resistance created. One of the major areas affected by the globalization is education and training institutions. The purpose of this study is to determine the viewpoints of academic staff related to the expected and observed effects of globalization on the dimensions of administration, finance, technology, research and instruction, and whether there are significant differences between academic staff’ viewpoints of expected and observed effects of globalization. The items were grouped in relating with the dimensions of administration, finance, technology, research and instruction. The reliability and validity analysis was made and Cronbach alfa reliability coefficient was found 0.98. Means, paired t- tests, non-paired t test, One way ANOVA and LSD were used in the analysis of data. According to the results of this research, academic staffs in PESA (Physical Education and Sports Academies) evaluate the effects of globalization as expected ones. However they assert that they could not entirely observe the expected effects of the referred dimensions of globalization

Keywords

• Globalization, physical education and sports academies, administration, finance, technology, research, learning/teaching dimension

Examination of the effects of globalization over physical education and sports academies (sample of Ankara)

Abstract

One of the most discussed topics in recent years is the question of globalization or nationalization
(regionalization). In other words, strong capital dominated policy and modernizing technology, religion, and
national identity, tradition, protection of cultural and linguistic differences on the resistance created. One of the
major areas affected by the globalization is education and training institutions. The purpose of this study is to
determine the viewpoints of academic staff related to the expected and observed effects of globalization on the
dimensions of administration, finance, technology, research and instruction, and whether there are significant
differences between academic staff' viewpoints of expected and observed effects of globalization. The items were
grouped in relating with the dimensions of administration, finance, technology, research and instruction. The
reliability and validity analysis was made and Cronbach alfa reliability coefficient was found 0.98. Means, paired
t- tests, non-paired t test, One way ANOVA and LSD were used in the analysis of data. According to the results
of this research, academic staffs in PESA (Physical Education and Sports Academies) evaluate the effects of
globalization as expected ones. However they assert that they could not entirely observe the expected effects of
the referred dimensions of globalization.

Keywords

• Globalization; physical education and sports academies; administration; finance; technology; research; learning/teaching dimension

References

1. Arıboğan DÜ. Küreselleşme Senaryosunun Aktörleri. İstanbul: Derin Yayınları, 1996.
2. Arslanoğlu RA. Küreselleşme ve Üniversite. Uludağ Journal of Economy and Society, 2002; 21(1): 142.
3. Ateş D. Globalization: to What Extent is it One- Dimensional? Doğuş University Journal, 2006; 7(1): 25-38.
4. Bolay SH. Siyasi, Ekonomik ve Kültürel Boyutlarıyla Küreselleşme. Küreselleşme ve Milli Kültürler. Istanbul: Ufuk Kitapları 27, Sosyal Bil. Dizisi 3, 2002.
5. Freeman A, Kagarlitsky B. Küreselleşmenin Krizi. Çev.: İbrahim Yıldız, Bahar Kara. Yordam Kitap Bas. Yay. 2004: 23-26.
6. Giddens A. Sosyoloji. Ankara: Ayraç Yayınları, 2000.
7. Güzelcik E. Küreselleşme ve İşletmelerde Değişen Kurum İmajı. İstanbul: Sistem Yayınları, 1999.
8. Holton R. Globalization's cultural consequences, dimensions of globalization. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2000; (570): 140-152.

9. Jameson F. Küreselleşme ve Politik Strateji. Birikim, 2000; (139): 39–50.
10. Kale N. Modernizmden post-modernist söylemlere doğru. Doğu Batı Düşünce Dergisi, 2002; 5(19): 29–46.
11. Kwiek M. Yüksek Öğretimi Yeniden Düşünürken Yeni Bir Paradigma Olarak Küreselleşme: Gelecek İçin Göstergeler. Çev. Akbaş E., Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, İstanbul: EDAM Yayınları, 2002, 2(1): 133-154
12. Magdoff H. The Age of Imperialism, The Economics of U.S. Foreign Poicy. Emperyalizm Çağı, A.B.D.’nin Dış Politikasının Ekonomik Temelleri. Çev.: Doğan Şafak, Odak Yayınevi, Ankara. 1974.
13. Manisalı E. Türkiye ve Küreselleşme, İstanbul: Derin Yayınevi, 2002.
14. Narlı Ö. Küreselleşme – mesih mi şeytan mı? Bursa Tabip Odası Yayın Organı. Bursa: Hekimce Bakış, 2002 (53): 25
15. Newman C. Realizm: Küreselleşme ve Bağımsız Devlet. Çev: Muammer Türker, Türkiye Günlüğü, 2001 (64): 79–88.
16. Oran B. Küreselleşme ve Azınlıklar. Ankara: İmaj Yayınevi, 2000.
17. Robertson R. Küreselleşme. Çev. Ümit Yasal, Ankara: Bilim Yay., 1999.
18. Saage R. Postmodernlik ve Aydınlanma. Çev.: Ahmet Arslan, Yeni Forum, 1993; 14(287): 51–55.
19. SönmezV. Küreselleşmenin felsefi temelleri. Eğitim Araştırmaları, 2002; (6): 2-11.
20. Şaylan G. Küreselleşmenin Gelişimi – Küreselleşme. Ankara: İmge Kitabevi, 1997.
21. Senturk IK. The Effected of Globalization over Educational Faculties. Hacettepe Univerity Doctoral Thesis, Ankara, 2007.
22. Toprak M. Küreselleşme ve Kriz Türkiye ve Dünya Deneyimi. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 2001.
23. Tutar, H. Küreselleşme Sürecinde İşletme Yönetimi. İstanbul: Hayat Yayıncılık, 2000.
24. Yılmaz A. Modernden Postmoderne Siyasal Arayışlar. Ankara: Vadi Yayınları, 1996.