Analysis of sports management students’ opinions on project-based learning

Year 2018, , 245 - 249, 30.12.2018

Ahmet Şahin

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.461973

Abstract

The purpose of this study is
to analyze Sports Management Students’ Opinions on Project-Based Learning. A
great majority of the sports management students who participated in the study
do sports regularly and only a little portion of 3.3 % stated that they do not
do sports at all. In order to
determine the attitudes of students towards the method of Project-Based
Learning, an attitude scale -originally called Project-Based Learning Attitude
Scale (PBLAS), which consisted of a total of 26 items (13 positive and 13
negative) was prepared after receiving the expert opinion of Sezgin in 2008. The ratio of female sports management
students who read books is higher that the ratio of male students. On the other
hand, the frequency of visiting entertainment venues is higher for male
students compared to female students. When the average scores of the answers
given to the Project-Based Learning scale are observed, it can be concluded
that the students who participated in the study were eager to make use of the
benefits of project-based learning, however because they were also affected
from negative cases, they were often undecided. When the opinions of the
project-based learning study participants are analyzed according to gender, it
can be claimed that for the 4 items that were available in the scale, male
students had more positive opinions compared to female students. It can be also
seen that more female students expressed positive opinions for item first.

Keywords

Sports Management, Students, Project-Based Learning

References

• 1. Acar EN. The Effect of Project-Based Learning on the Scientific Process Skills of Science Teachers and their Attitude towards Biology, (Unpublished master thesis). Canakkale, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, 2011.
• 2. Acar G The effect of project-based learning on students’ motivation. International Journal of Academic Research, 2013; 5(2):82-86.
• 3. Aladag S. The Effect of Project-Based Learning Approach on the Academic Success Level of Students in Primary Education Mathematics Teaching, (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara, Gazi University, 2005.
• 4. Balki AG. Evaluation of the Application of the Project-Based Learning Method by Konya Esentepe Elementary Private School, (Unpublished master thesis). Konya, Selcuk University, 2003.
• 5. Blumenfeld, P, Soloway E, Marx RA. Motivating project based learning: sustaining the doing supporting the learner. Educational Psychologist, 1991; 26(3-4):369-398.
• 6. Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Wolf S. Meta cognition in time stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Human Factors, 1996; 38(2):206-219.
• 7. Coskun M. The Approach of Project-Based Learning in Geography Education, (Unpublished PhD. Thesis). Ankara, Gazi University, 2004.
• 8. Demirhan C, Demirel O. The approach of project-based learning in program Development, Journal of Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Education, 2003; 3(5):48-61.
• 9. Erdem M, Akkoyunlu B. A Study on the Project-Based Learning Approach Carried Out with Fifth Grade Students within the Scope of Primary Education Social Studies, İlkogretim-Online, 2002; 1(1): 2-11.
• 10. Haliloglu Z, Asan A. The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning Method in the Computer Course given in Primary Education Secondary Stage Schools, 12. Educational Sciences Conference Proceedings Book, pp.2, Ankara, 2004.
• 11. Howell RT. The importence of the project method ın technology education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 2003; 40(3).
• 12. Kalaycı N. A Project-based learning application -example in higher education. Education and Science, 2008; 33(147):85-105.
• 13. Knoll M. The project method. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1997; (3):59-80.
• 14. Korkmaz H. Alternative Evaluation Approaches in Science And Technology Education, Ankara; Yeryuzu Press, 2004.
• 15. Lee CI, Tsai FY. Internet project-based learning environment: the effects of thinking styles on learning transfer, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2004; 20(1):31-39.
• 16. Moti F, Abigail B. Integrating alternative asseement in a project based learning course for pre- service science and technology teachers. Assesment and Evaluatinon in Higher Education, 2004; 29(1):41-61.
• 17. Polat H. The Effect of Management and Monitoring Systems in Project-Based Learning on Student Success Levels and Student Attitudes, (Unpublished master thesis). Elazig, Firat University, 2011.
• 18. Saban A. The Process of Teaching Learning, Improved 2nd Edition, Ankara: Nobel Press, 2002.
• 19. Saracaloglu AS, Akamca GO, Yesildere S. The place of project-based learning in primary education, Gazi University Turkish Education Science Journal, 2006; 4(3).
• 20. Sezgin F. The Effect of Project Based Learning and Portfolio Evaluation on the Students Achievement and Attitude Levels, (Unpublished master thesis). Zonguldak Karaelmas University, 2008.
• 21. Taskin O, Apaydin Z, Aydin H, Cakici Y, Gemici O, Irez S, Kose S, Matyar F, Ozsevgec T, Peker D, Saka AZ, Tas E, Turgut H. Novel Approaches in Science and Technology Education, Ankara: Pegema Press, 2008.
• 22. Thomas JW. A Review of Research on Project Based Learning. http://www.bie.org/tmp/research/researchreviewPBL.pdf. Access: 15.5.2018
• 23. Yurtluk M. The Effect of the Project-Based Learning Approach on Student Attitudes and the Learning Process n Mathematics, (Unpublished master thesis). Ankara Hacettepe University, 2003.