Study on Courage Perceptions of Athletes Participating in Eastern Anatolia Turkish Senior boxing Championship Natıonal Team Selections

Year 2019, , 252 - 260, 15.09.2019

Serkan Zengin

https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.540056

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The aim
of this research is to compare sub-dimensions of courage scale in sports which
are competence-proficiency, determination, boldness, taking risk and being
self-sacrificing in sports according to various demographic values of boxers
participating in senior national team selections held in Eastern Anatolia.
Sample group of the study consists of 61 boxers participating in national team
selections. In the research, personal information form for participants and
scale of courage in sports developed by Konter and Johan (11) were used. Boxers' ages, types of
residences where they live, educational status, occupations of their parents,
income levels, sport ages and athlete status were compared with the
sub-dimensions of the scale. SPSS 22.0 Windows program was used to analyze data
obtained. As a result of normality tests, it was determined that the data were
not distributed normally. Because of this reason, while non-parametric Kruskal
Wallis H test was used in the study, Mann Whitney U test was used to compare
sub-dimension scores of scale according to mother's educational status.
Significance level was accepted as <0,05. As a result, for boxers
participating in the selection, there was no significant difference between
sub-dimensions of courage scale in sports and their ages, types of residences
where they live, educational status, occupations of their parents, income
levels, sport ages, athlete status.

Keywords

Sports, courage in sports, boxing

References

• 1. Can Y, Kaçay Z. Sporcu Kimlik Algısı İle Cesaret ve Özgüven Duyguları Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi, Journal of Human Sciences, 2016; 13(3): 6176-6184.
• 2. Cashmore E. Sport and Exercise psychology, the key concepts. London. Rutledge. 2008
• 3. Cava La C. “ Prevention in Boxing” The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fittnes.1983; Vol.:23. N.:4.
• 4. Corlett J. Virtue lost: Courage in sport. In. A. Hollowchak (Ed.), Philosophy in Sport, pp.2002; 454-465, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• 5. Gökkaya D, Biçer T. Psikolojik Beceri Kıstası Olarak Özgüvenin, Elit Sporcuların Performansına Katkısı; Boks Milli Takımı Örneği, Marmara Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2017; 3 (1), 16-28.
• 6. Güvendi B. Türksoy A. Güçlü M. Konter E. Profesyonel Güreşçilerin Cesaret Düzeyleri ve Zihinsel Dayanıklılıklarının İncelenmesi, International Journal Of Sports Exercise & Training Sciences, 2018; 4 (2), 70-78.
• 7. http://www.tdk.gov.tr
• 8. Kaya B. Bireysel ve Takım Sporcularının Sporda Cesaret Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antrenörlük Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi.2018.
• 9. Kilmann RH. O’Hara LA. Strauss JP. Developing and validating a quantitative measure of organizational courage. J Bus Psychol, 2010; 25: 15-23
• 10. Kocaman G. Atay E. Alp M. Suna G. Okçularda Spor Yaralanmaları Bölgelerinin ve Türlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turkısh Journal of Sports Medicine,2018; 53(1).
• 11. Konter E. & Johan N. G. Development of sport courage scale, Journal of Human Kinetics 2012; 33, 163-172.
• 12. Lopez SJ. Profiling courage: Introduction to the special issue on courage.J Posit Psychol, 2007; 2: 79
• 13. Mitchell H. Williams L. H. and Reter B. R.: “Clasification of Sports”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. American College of Sports Medicine and the American College of Cardiology.1994.
• 14. Park N. Peterson C. Classification and Measurement of Character Strengths: Implication for Practice. In: Positive Psychology in Practice. Eds: PA Linley, S Joseph. NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2004.
• 15. Woodard CR. Pury CLS. The construct of courage: Categorization and Measurement. Cons Psychol J: Practice and Research, 2007; 2: 135-147