Determining The Relationship Between Speed and Branch Specific Test for Fencers in The U 10-12 Categories

Year 2021, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 130 - 135, 31.08.2021

Sercin Kosova , Merve Koca Kosova , Celal Gençoğlu , Hikmet Gümüş , Fırat Özdalyan , Egemen Mancı

https://izlik.org/JA23YN63PR

Abstract

Success in fencing is gained by making quick decisions and acting quickly during the bout. This study aimed to determine the body composition of fencers competing in the U 10-12 age categories and to examine the relationship between the 30-m speed test (30-m ST) and the 7-m repeat lunge ability test (7-m RLAT). Thirty-eight sabre fencers (female: 25 and male: 13) participated in the study. The anthropometric properties of the participants were determined, then the 30-m ST and the 7-m RLAT, a specific test for fencing, were performed. The differences between sexes were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test because the data were not distributed normally, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between performance tests. When the results of the study were examined, there was no significant difference between the sexes in the physical characteristics and performance tests of the athletes (p>0.05). Also, when all fencers were evaluated together, a significant relationship was found between the 30-m ST and the 7-m RLAT (rs(36)=0.526, p=0.001). When the sexes were examined separately, a significant relationship was found between the 30-m ST and the 7-m RLAT only in the male group (rs(23)=0.659, p<0.001). The 7-m RLAT can be used instead of or in addition to anaerobic power and speed tests for performance measurement in fencers.

Keywords

fencing , speed , branch specific test

References

• 1. Redondo JC, Alonso CJ, Sedano S, de Benito AM. Effects of a 12-week strength training program on experimented fencers' movement time. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2014;28(12):3375-84.
• 2. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of sports sciences. 2006;24(9):919-32.
• 3. Roi GS, Bianchedi D. The science of fencing. Sports Medicine. 2008;38(6):465-81.
• 4. Guilhem G, Giroux C, Couturier A, Chollet D, Rabita G. Mechanical and muscular coordination patterns during a high-level fencing assault. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2014;46(2):341-50.
• 5. Wylde JM, Tan FH, O’Donoghue GP. A time-motion analysis of elite women’s foil fencing. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2013;13(2):365-76.
• 6. Kosova S, Gümüş H, Koca Kosova M, Tok Mİ. The effect of acute vibration on visual reaction time in fencers. Sportis. 2020;6(3):517-32.
• 7. Turna B. The Effect of Agility Training on Reaction Time in Fencers. Journal of Education and Learning. 2020;9(1):127-35.
• 8. Diedhiou AB, Dicle A, Akalan C. Binicilik Sporunda Doğru Biniş Tekniği ve Vücut Kompozisyonunun Başarıyla İlişkisi. Spor Eğitim Dergisi. 2019;3(3):88-94.
• 9. Gökhan İs, Aktaş Y. Üniversite takiminda yer alan kadin voleybolcularda 6 haftalik antrenmansizliğin vücut kompozisyonu üzerine etkisi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;14(2):225-32.
• 10. Aktaş HN, Aslan CS. Amatör Futbolcularda Vücut Kompozisyonu İle Sürat Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;1(1):17-25.
• 11. Tsolakis C, Bogdanis G, Vagenas G. Anthropometric profile and limb asymmetries in young male and female fencers. Journal of Human Movement Studies. 2006;50(3):201-15.
• 12. Turner AN, Marshall G, Phillips J, Noto A, Buttigieg C, Chavda S, et al. Physical characteristics underpinning repetitive lunging in fencing. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2016;30(11):3134-9.
• 13. Turner AN, Bishop CJ, Cree JA, Edwards ML, Chavda S, Read PJ, et al. Do fencers require a weapon-specific approach to strength and conditioning training? The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2017;31(6):1662-8.
• 14. Pekel HA, Balci ŞS, Arslan Ö, Bağci E, Aydos L, Tamer K, et al. Atletizm Yapan Çocuklarin Performansla Ilgili Fiziksel Uygunluk Test Sonuçlarinin Ve Bazi Antrepometrik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. 2007;15(1):427-38.
• 15. Tsolakis C, Tsekouras YE, Daviotis T, Koulouvaris P, Papaggelopoulos PJ. Neuromuscular Screening to predict young fencers' performance. Biology of Exercise. 2018;14(1).
• 16. Tsolakis C, Kostaki E, Vagenas G. Anthropometric, flexibility, strength-power, and sport-specific correlates in elite fencing. Perceptual and motor skills. 2010;110(3_suppl):1015-28.
• 17. Pyne DB, Saunders PU, Montgomery PG, Hewitt AJ, Sheehan K. Relationships between repeated sprint testing, speed, and endurance. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2008;22(5):1633-7.
• 18. Lockie RG, Moreno MR, Orjalo AJ, Stage AA, Liu TM, Birmingham-Babauta SA, et al. Repeated-sprint ability in Division I collegiate male soccer players: Positional differences and relationships with performance tests. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2019;33(5):1362-70.
• 19. Peterson BJ, Fitzgerald JS, Dietz CC, Ziegler KS, Baker SE, Snyder EM. Off-ice anaerobic power does not predict on-ice repeated shift performance in hockey. Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2016;30(9):2375-81.